Relative effects of juvenile and adult environmental factors on mate attraction and recognition in the cricket, Allonemobius socius

Journal of Insect Science

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Olvido, Alexander E ^a,c   Fernandes, Pearl R ^b   Mousseau, Timothy A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA   (United States)

^b University of South Carolina Sumter   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

heritability; maternal effect; mating call; Orthoptera; phonotaxis; reaction norm

Indexed keywords

ALLONEMOBIUS SOCIUS; GRYLLIDAE; ORTHOPTERA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 77955615623     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15362442     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1673/031.010.9001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andersson MB. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press.
2. Boldman KG, Kriese LA, Van Vleck LD, Van Tassell CP, Kachman SD. 1995. A Manual for use of MTDFREML. A Set of Programs to Obtain Estimates of Variances and Covariances [Draft]. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.
3. Bonduriansky R. 2001. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: A synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biological Reviews 76: 305-339.
4. Britch SC, Cain ML, Howard DJ. 2001. Spatiooral dynamics of the Allonemobius fasciatus-A. socius mosaic hybrid zone: A 14-year perspective. Molecular Ecology 10: 627-638.
5. Brooks MW. 1882. Influence of temperature on the chirp of the cricket. Popular Science Monthly 20: 268.
6. Conover WJ. 1999. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons.
7. Dingle H. 1996. Migration: The biology of life on the move. Oxford University Press.
8. Dobzhansky Th. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press.
9. Dolbear AE. 1897. The cricket as a thermometer. The American Naturalist 31: 970-971.
10. Etges WJ, de Oliveira CC, Gragg E, Ortíz-Barrientos D, Noor MAF, Ritchie MG. 2007. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions. Evolution 61: 1106-1119.
11. Ferreira GB, MacNeil MD, Van Vleck LD. 1999. Variance components and breeding values for growth traits from different statistical models. Journal of Animal Science 77: 2641-2650.
12. Grace JL, Shaw KL. 2004. Effects of developmental environment on signalpreference coupling in a Hawaiian cricket. Evolution 58: 1627-1633.
13. Groot AT, Horovitz JL, Hamilton J, Santangelo RG, Schal C, Gould F. 2005. Experimental evidence for interspecific directional selection on moth pheromone communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 103: 5858-5863.
14. Hebets EA. 2003. Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: Exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 100: 13390-13395
15. Hedrick AV. 1988. Female choice and the heritability of attractive male traits: An empirical study. The American Naturalist 132: 267-276.
16. Howard DJ, Furth DG. 1986. Review of the Allonemobius fasciatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae) complex with the description of two new species separated by electrophoresis, songs, and morphometrics. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 79: 472-481.
17. Howard DJ, Waring GL. 1991. Topographic diversity, zone width, and the strength of reproductive isolation in a zone of overlap and hybridization. Evolution 45: 1120-1135.
18. Kirkpatrick M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36: 1-12.
19. Lloyd JE. 1984. On deception, a way of all flesh, and firefly signaling and sytematics. In: Dawkins R, Ridley M, editors. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology Vol.1. pp. 48-54. Oxford University Press.
20. Marler CA, Ryan MJ. 1997. Origin and maintenance of a female mating preference. Evolution 51: 1244-1248.
21. Marshall JL. 2004. The Allonemobius- Wolbachia host-endosymbiont system: Evidence for rapid speciation and against reproductive isolation driven by cytoplasmic incompatibility. Evolution 58: 2409-2425.
22. Mousseau TA. 1991. Geographic variation in maternal-age effects on diapause in a cricket. Evolution 45: 1053-1059.
23. Mousseau TA, Howard DL. 1998. Genetic variation in cricket calling song across a hybrid zone between two sibling species. Evolution 52: 1104-1110.
24. Mousseau TA, Roff DA. 1995. Genetic and environmental contributions to geographic variation in the ovipositor length of a cricket. Ecology 76: 1473-1482.
25. Mousseau TA, Roff DA. 1989. Adaptation to seasonality in a cricket: Patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation in body size and diapause expression along a cline in season length. Evolution 43: 1483-1496.
26. Mullen SP, Mendelson TC, Schal C, Shaw KL. 2007. Rapid evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in a species radiation of acoustically diverse Hawaiian crickets (Gryllidae: Trigonidiinae: Laupala). Evolution 61: 223-231.
27. Olvido AE, Mousseau TA. 1995. Effect of rearing environment on calling-song plasticity in the striped ground cricket. Evolution 49: 1271-1277.
28. Olvido AE, Wagner Jr WE. 2004. Signal components, acoustic preference functions and sexual selection in a cricket. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 83: 461-472.
29. Paterson HEH. 1985. The recognition concept of species. In: Vrba ES, editor. Species and Speciation. pp. 21-29. Transvaal Museum.
30. Saino N, Ferrari RP, Romano M, Martinelli R, Lacroix A, Gil D, Møller AP. 2006. Maternal allocation of androgens and antagonistic effects of yolk androgens on sons and daughters. Behavioral Ecology 17: 172-181.
31. Tregenza T, Wedell N. 1997. Definitive evidence for cuticular pheromones in a cricket. Animal Behaviour 54: 979-984.
32. Veech JA, Benedix Jr JH, Howard DJ. 1996. Lack of mating call displacement between two closely related ground crickets. Evolution 50: 1982-1989
33. Wagner Jr WE, Basolo AL. 2007. The relative importance of different direct benefits in the mate choices of a field cricket. Evolution 61: 617-622.
34. Walker Jr TJ. 2000. Pulse rates in the songs of trilling field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Gryllus). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93: 565-572.
35. Walker Jr TJ. 1957. Specificity in the response of female tree crickets (Orthoptera, Gryllidae, Oecanthinae) to mating calls of the males. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 50: 626-636.
36. Walker TJ, Masaki S. 1989. Life cycle. In: Huber F, Moore TE , Loher W, editors. Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology. pp. 1- 42. Cornell University Press.
37. Webb KL, Roff DA. 1992. The quantitative genetics of sound production in Gryllus firmus. Animal Behaviour 44: 823-832.
38. Whitesell JJ, Walker Jr TJ. 1978. Photoperiodically determined dimorphic mating calls in a katydid. Nature 274: 887-888.
39. Yamashita O. 1996. Diapause hormone in the silkworm, Bombyx mori: Structure, gene expression, and function. Journal of Insect Physiology 42: 669-679.