Can silver nanoparticles affect the mineral content, structure and mechanical properties of chicken embryo bones?

Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 286-291

  Sikorska, J ^a   Szmidt, M ^a   Sawosz, E ^a   Niemiec, T ^a   Grodzik, M ^a   Chwalibog, A ^b  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bones; Chicken embryo; Mechanical properties; Mineral content; Nanoparticles; Silver

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955586361     PISSN: 12301388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22358/jafs/66290/2010     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bhattacharya R., Mukherjee P., 2008. Biological properties of "naked" metal nanoparticles. Advan. Drug Delivery Rev. 60, 1289-1306
2. Currey D.J., 2004a. Tensile yield in compact bone is determined by strain, post-yield behaviour by mineral content. J. Biomech. 37, 549-556
3. Currey D.J., 2004b. Incompatible mechanical properties in compact bone. Theor. Biol. 231, 569-580
4. Dziedzic-Gocławska A., 1995. Bone tissue (in Polish). In: Histology. PZWL, pp. 244-305
5. Foye O.T., Uni Z., Ferket P.R., 2006. Effect of in ovo feeding egg white protein, beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, and carbohydrates on glycogen status and neonatal growth of turkeys. Poultry Sci. 85, 1185-1192
6. Gralak M.A., Piastowska A.W., Leontowicz H., Leontowicz M., Antczak A., Kulasek G., Szara T., Narojek T., 2004. Effect of dietary protein level and sources on bone mineralization and structure in rats. Biofactors 22, 25-28
7. Johnston P., Comar C., 1955. Distribution of calcium from the albumen, yolk and shell to the developing chick embryo. Amer. J. Physiol. 183, 365-370
8. Kim Y.S., Kim J.S., Cho H.S., Rha D.S., Kim J.M., Park J.D., Choi B.S., Lim R., Chang H.K., Chung Y.H., Kwon I.H., Jeong J., Han B.S., Yu I.J., 2008. Twenty-eight-day oral toxicity, genotoxicity, and gender-related tissue distribution of silver nanoparticles in Sprague-Dawley rats. Inhal. Toxicol. 20, 575-583
9. Leeson T., Leeson C., 1963. The chorioallantoic of the chick. Light and electron microscopic observations at various times of incubation. J. Anat. 97, 585-1559
10. Libby P., Aikawa M., 2002. Vitamin C, collagen, and cracks in the plaque. Circulation 105, 1396-1398
11. Nagy A.J., Mestl G., Herein D., Weinberg G., Kitzelmann E., Schlogl R., 1999. The correlation of subsurface oxygen diffusion with variations of silver morphology in the silver-oxygen system. J. Catal. 182, 417-429
12. Puls R., 1995. Mineral Levels in Animal Health. Diagnostic Data. Serpa International, Clearbrook
13. Rai M., Yadav A., Gade A., 2009. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotech. Adv. 27, 76-83
14. Salata O.V., 2004. Application of nanoparticles in bio0logy and medicine. J. Nanobiotech. 2, 1-6
15. Sawosz E., Grodzik M., Zielińska M., Niemiec T., Olszańska B., Chwalibog A., 2009. Nanoparticles of silver do not affect growth, development and DNA oxidative damage in chicken embryos. Arch. Geflügelk. 73, 208-213
16. Szulc P., Beck T.J., Marchand F., Delmas P.D., 2005. Low skeletal muscle mass is associated with poor structural parameters of bone and impaired balance in elderly men - The MINOS study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 20, 721-729
17. Williams D., 2002. Medical technology: How small we can go? Med. Device Tech. 4, 7-9