The evaluation of Russian cancer research

Research Evaluation

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 129-144

  Lewison, Grant ^a   Markusova, Valentina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955573557     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/095820210X510098     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baker, R and D Jackson 2006. Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies. Biometrics, 62(3), 785-792.
2. Braun, T and I Diospatonyi 2005. The counting of core journal gatekeepers as science indicators really counts. The scientific scope of action and strength of nations. Scientometrics, 62(3), 297-319.
3. Braun, T and I Diospatonyi 2006. Gatekeeping in the international journal literature of chemistry. Information Processing and Management, 42(6), 1652-1656.
4. Cambrosio, A, P Keating, S Mercier, G Lewison and A Mogoutov 2006. Mapping the emergence and development of translational cancer research. European Journal of Cancer, 42(18), 3140-3148.
5. Coleman, S R 2001. Sources of increasing agedness of references in psychology-of-learning textbooks, 1952-1995. Psychological Reports, 88(3), 690-692.
6. Davis, G and P Royle 1996. A comparison of Australian university output using journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 35, 45-58.
7. Davydov, M I and E M Axel 2007. Malignant neoplasms and mortality from them in New Independent States in 2005. Herald of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 11, 45-49.
8. Dawson, G, B Lucocq, R Cottrell and G Lewison 1998. Mapping the Landscape: National Biomedical Research Outputs 1988- 95. London: The Wellcome Trust, Policy Report no 9. ISBN 1869835 95 6.
9. De Filippo, D, J Aparicio and I Gomez 2009. Measuring the benefits of international collaboration. A case study of the relationship between Latin-American and European countries. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2, 920-921.
10. Eckhouse, S, G Lewison and R Sullivan 2007. Investment and Outputs of Cancer Research: from the Public Sector to Industry. The second cancer research funding survey. London: European Cancer Research Managers Forum.
11. Epstein, R J 2004. Journal impact factors do not equitably reflect academic staff performance in different medical subspecialties. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 52(8), 531-536.
12. Ferraz, M B 2003. Cochrane Collaboration: an international initiative to prepare, maintain and disseminate systematic reviews (meta-analysis) of health care research. International Orthopaedics, 27(2), B2.
13. Frame, JD and F Narin 1977. International distribution of biomedical publications. Federation Proceedings, 36(6), 1790-1795.
14. Garfield, E 1979. Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities. New York: Wiley.
15. Glänzel, W 2001. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.
16. Graham, L R 1998. What Have We Learned about Science and Technology from the Russian Experience? Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. Grant, J, R Cottrell, F Chuzeau and G Fawcett 2000. Evaluating 'payback' on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: applied bibliometric study. British Medical Journal, 320, 1107-1111.
18. Griggs, R A and D L Proctor 2002. A citation analysis of who's who in introductory textbooks. Teaching of Psychology, 29(3), 203-206.
19. Hansson, S 1995. Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals. Lancet, 346, 906.
20. Inzelt, A, A Schubert and M Schubert 2009. Incremental citation impact due to international co-authorship in Hungarian higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 78(1), 37-43.
21. Kobberling, J 2000. Quality of German medical journals Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 125(38), 1106-1108.
22. Kurstein, P, L L Gluud, M Willemann, K R Olsen, J Kjellberg, J Sogaard and C Gluud 2005. Agreement between reported use of interventions for liver diseases and research evidence in Cochrane systematic reviews. Journal of Hepatology, 43(6), 984-989.
23. Leta, J and H Chaimovich 2002. Recognition and international collaboration: the Brazilian case. Scientometrics, 53(3), 325-335
24. Lewison, G 1996. The definition of biomedical research subfields with title keywords and application to the analysis of research outputs. Research Evaluation, 6(1), 25-36.
25. Lewison, G 2002. Researchers' and users' perceptions of the relative standing of biomedical papers in different journals. Scientometrics, 53(2), 229-240.
26. Lewison, G 2009. The percentage of reviews in research output: a simple measure of research esteem. Research Evaluation, 18(1), March, 25-37.
27. Lewison, G and G Paraje 2004. The classification of biomedical journals by research level. Scientometrics, 60(2), 145-157.
28. Lewison, G and R Sullivan 2008. The impact of cancer research: how publications influence UK cancer clinical guidelines. British Journal of Cancer, 98(12), 1944-1950.
29. Lewison, G and K Wilcox-Jay 2003. Getting biomedical research into practice: the citations from UK clinical guidelines. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Beijing, China, 152-160.
30. Lewison, G, A Fawcett-Jones and C Kessler 1993. Latin American scientific output 1986-91 and international co-authorship patterns. Scientometrics, 27(3), 317-336.
31. Lewison, G, S Tootell, P Roe and R Sullivan 2008. How do the media report cancer research? A study of the UK's BBC website. British Journal of Cancer, 99(4), 569-576.
32. Lichterman, B 2002. Conflict or harmony? Clinical research and medical press in Russia. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 383-386.
33. Luukkonen, T, O Persson and G Sivertsen 1992. Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science Technology and Human Values, 17(1), 101-126.
34. Markusova, V A, V A Minin, L M Mirabyan and M B Arapov 1999. Policy for distribution of grants in New Russia in 1993-1994 by two funding agencies: International Science Foundation and Russian Foundation for Basic Research. Research Evaluation, 8(1), April, 53-59.
35. Markusova, V A, C Wilson and M Davis 2002. From bioweapon to biodefence: the collaborative literature of biodefence in the 1990s. Scientometrics, 53(1), 21-38.
36. Martin, B 1996. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, 36, 343-362.
37. Moed, H F and T N van Leeuwen 1996. Impact factors can mislead. Nature, 381, 186.
38. Murray, C J L and A D Lopez 1996. The Global Burden of Disease. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-35448-6.
39. Narin, F, K Stevens and E S Whitlow 1991. Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21(3), 313-323.
40. Olmeda-Gomez, C, M A Ovalie-Perandones, A Perianes- Rodriguez and F de Moya-Anegon 2008. International research impact and scientific collaboration of universities from Catalonia, 2000-2004. Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica, 31(4), 591-611.
41. Ooi, E S and S Chapman 2003. An analysis of newspaper reports of cancer breakthroughs: hope or hype? Medical Journal of Australia, 179, 639-643.
42. Rodger, S, K McKenna and T Brown 2007. Quality and impact of occupational therapy journals: authors' perspectives. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54(3), 174-184.
43. Van Raan, A F J 1998. The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results - some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423-428.
44. WHO, World Health Organisation 2009. Health statistics and health information systems: burden of disease. Available at: , last accessed 1 May 2010.
45. Wilson, C and V A Markusova 2004. Changes in the scientific output of Russia from 1980-2000, as reflected in the Science Citation Index, in relation to national politico-economic factors. Scientometrics, 59(3), 345-389.