Minimally invasive circumcision with a novel plastic clamp technique: A review of 7,500 cases

Pediatric Surgery International

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 739-745

  Senel, Ferda M ^a   Demirelli, Mustafa ^b   Oztek, Sehmuz ^c  

^a DR SAMI ULUS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b Elif Medical Center   (Turkey)

^c GAP Circumcision Clinic   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Ali's clamp technique; Circumcision; Complications; Minimally invasive

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CHILD; CIRCUMCISION; CLAMP; HUMAN; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CIRCUMCISION, MALE; CONSTRICTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MALE; PENILE DISEASES; PENIS; PLASTICS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TURKEY;

EID: 77955550196     PISSN: 01790358     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-010-2632-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. TR O'Brien EE Calle WK Poole 1995 Incidence of neonatal circumcision in Atlanta, 1985-1986 South Med J 88 411 415 7716592
2. EO Laumann CM Masi EW Zuckerman 1997 Circumcision in the United States. Prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice JAMA 277 1052 1057 10.1001/jama.277.13.1052 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3jvVKmsg%3D%3D 9091693
3. EJ Schoen 1990 The status of circumcision of newborns N Engl J Med 322 1308 1312 1:STN:280:DyaK3c3itVOqsw%3D%3D 2183057
4. D Singh-Grewal J Macdessi J Craig 2005 Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies Arch Dis Child 90 853 858 10.1136/adc.2004.049353 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzotFersg%3D%3D 15890696
5. RM Seyam NK Bissada AA Mokhtar WA Mourad M Aslam N Elkum SA Kattan KA Hanash 2006 Outcome of penile cancer in circumcised men J Urol 175 6 557 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00234-X
6. R Gray G Kigozi D Serwadda F Makumbi S Watya F Nalugoda N Kiwanuka L Moulton M Chaudhary M Chen 2007 Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial Lancet 369 657 666 10.1016/S0140-6736(07) 60313-4 17321311
7. N Williams L Kapila 1993 Complications of circumcision Br J Surg 80 1231 1236 10.1002/bjs.1800801005 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FmtFCguw%3D%3D 8242285
8. A Ahmed NH Mbibi D Dawam GD Kalayi 1999 Complications of traditional male circumcision Ann Trop Paediatr 19 113 117 10.1080/02724939992743 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FntlCltg%3D%3D 10605531
9. J Ben Chaim PM Livne J Binyamini B Hardak D Ben-Meir Y Mor 2005 Complications of circumcision in Israel: a one year multicenter survey Isr Med Assoc J 7 368 370 15984378
10. HS Yellin 1935 Bloodless circumcision of the newborn Am J Obstet Gynecol 30 146
11. RE Johnsonbaugh BP Meyer JD Catalano 1969 Complication of a circumcision performed with a plastic bell clamp Am J Dis Child 118 781 1:STN:280: DyaE3c%2Fis1yrsQ%3D%3D 5348379
12. YF Peng Y Cheng GY Wang SQ Wang C Jia BH Yang R Zhu SC Jian QW Li DW Geng 2008 Clinical application of a new device for minimally invasive circumcision Asian J Androl 10 447 454 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2008.00411.x 18385906
13. JS Elder 2007 Circumcision BJU Int 99 1553 1564 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007. 06959.x 17537229
14. D Doyle 2005 Ritual male circumcision: a brief history J R Coll Physicians Edinb 35 279 285 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FhslWjuw%3D%3D 16402509
15. TE Wiswell HL Tencer CA Welch JL Chamberlain 1993 Circumcision in children beyond the neonatal period Pediatrics 92 791 793 1:STN:280: DyaK2c%2FltFCqtg%3D%3D 8233738
16. GJ Hardner T Bhanalaph GP Murphy DJ Albert RH Moore 1972 Carcinoma of the penis: analysis of therapy in 100 consecutive cases J Urol 108 428 430 1:STN:280:DyaE383lvVSksQ%3D%3D 5052252
17. DN Shaffer CT Bautista WB Sateren FK Sawe SC Kiplangat AO Miruka PO Renzullo PT Scott ML Robb NL Michael DL Birx 2007 The protective effect of circumcision on HIV incidence in rural low-risk men circumcised predominantly by traditional circumcisers in Kenya: two-year follow-up of the Kericho HIV Cohort Study J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 45 371 379 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318095a3da 17558336
18. WF Gee JS Ansell 1976 Neonatal circumcision: a ten-year overview: with comparison of the Gomco clamp and the Plastibell device Pediatrics 58 824 827 1:STN:280:DyaE2s%2FlslWisg%3D%3D 995507
19. AY al-Samarrai AB Mofti SJ Crankson A Jawad K Haque A al-Meshari 1988 A review of a Plastibell device in neonatal circumcision in 2,000 instances Surg Gynecol Obstet 167 341 343 1:STN:280:DyaL1czjslSntw%3D%3D 3047894
20. A Ahmed 2007 Childhood circumcision: a planned approach Trop Doct 37 239 241 10.1258/004947507782332865 17988494
21. IA Fraser MJ Allen PF Bagshaw M Johnstone 1981 A randomized trial to assess childhood circumcision with the Plastibell device compared to a conventional dissection technique Br J Surg 68 593 595 10.1002/bjs.1800680822 1:STN:280:DyaL38%2FgtFeisw%3D%3D 7023597
22. GW Kaplan 1983 Complications of circumcision Urol Clin North Am 10 543 549 1:STN:280:DyaL2c%2FhvV2gsQ%3D%3D 6623741
23. MK Atiker I Geçit V Yüzgeç O YalçIn 2005 Complicationsa of circumcision performed within and outside the hospital Int Urol Nephrol 37 97 99 10.1007/s11255-004-6077-2
24. SE Lerman JC Liao 2001 Neonatal circumcision Pediatr Clin North Am 48 1539 1557 10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70390-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnos1KlsA%3D%3D 11732129