Letter search and relatedness proportion: Further electrophysiological evidence for the automaticity of semantic activation

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 482, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 26-30

  Küper, Kristina ^a,b   Heil, Martin ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automatic semantic activation; Letter search; N400; Prime task effect; Semantic priming; Spreading activation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTIC MEMORY;

EID: 77955549730     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.084     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bentin S., McCarthy G., Wood C.C. Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985, 60:343-355.
2. Brown C., Hagoort P. The processing nature of the N400: evidence from masked priming. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 1993, 5:34-44.
3. Chwilla D.J., Brown C.M., Hagoort P. The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology 1995, 32:274-285.
4. Cinel C., Avons S.E., Russo R. Semantic activation and letter search; blocking or suppression?. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2009, 10.1080/17470210903038966.
5. Collins A.M., Loftus E.F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol. Rev. 1975, 82:407-428.
6. Deacon D., Hewitt S., Yang C., Nagata M. Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. Cognit. Brain Res. 2000, 9:137-146.
7. De Groot A.M.B., Thomassen A., Hudson P. Primed lexical decision: the effect of varying the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target. Acta Psychol. 1986, 6:17-36.
8. Dombrowski J.-H., Heil M. Semantic activation, letter search and N400: a reply to Mari-Beffa, Valdes Cullen, Catena and Houghton (2005). Brain Res. 2006, 1073-1074:440-443.
9. Ferguson R., Besner D. Basic processes in reading: can phonological recoding be blocked?. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 2006, 60:148-158.
10. Fischler I. Associative facilitation without expectancy in a lexical decision task. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1977, 3:18-26.
11. Friedrich F.J., Henik A., Tzelgov J. Automatic processes in lexical access and spreading activation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1991, 17:792-806.
12. Franklin M.S., Dien J., Neely J.H., Huber E., Waterson L.D. Semantic priming modulates the N400 N300 and N400RP. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:1053-1068.
13. Heil M., Rolke B., Pecchinenda A. Automatic semantic activation is no myth: semantic context effects on the N400 in the letter-search task in the absence of response time effects. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15:825-827.
14. Henik A., Friedrich F.J., Tzelgov J., Tramer S. Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming. Mem. Cognit. 1994, 22:157-168.
15. Holcomb P.J. Automatic and attentional processing: an event-related potential analysis of semantic priming. Brain Lang. 1988, 35:66-85.
16. Hutchison K.A., Bosco F.A. Congruency effects in the letter search task: semantic activation in the absence of priming. Mem. Cognit. 2007, 35:514-525.
17. Küper K., Heil M. Letter search does not affect semantic priming in a probe naming task. Acta Psychol. 2008, 129:325-331.
18. Küper K., Heil M. Electrophysiology reveals semantic priming at a short SOA irrespective of depth of prime processing. Neurosci. Lett. 2009, 453:107-111.
19. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980, 207(1980):203-205.
20. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. An electrophysiological probe of incidental semantic association. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 1989, 1:38-49.
21. Mari-Beffa P., Catena A., Valdes B., Cullen D.J., Houghton G. N400, the reference electrode and the semantic activation in prime-task experiments: a reply to Dombrowski and Heil (2006). Brain Res. 2007, 1147-1074:209-212.
22. Maxfield L. Attention and semantic priming: a review of prime task effects. Conscious Cognit. 1997, 6:204-218.
23. McNamara T.P. Semantic Priming: Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition 2005, Psychology Press, New York.
24. Neely J.H. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1977, 106:226-254.
25. Neely J.H., Kahan T.A. Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation. The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of R.G. Crowder 2001, 69-93. APA, Washington, DC. third ed. H.L. Roediger (Ed.).
26. Neely J.H., Keefe D.E. Semantic context effects on visual word processing: a hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory 1989, vol. 24:207-248. Academic Press, New York.
27. Neely J.H., O'Connor P.A., Calabrese G. Fast trial pacing in a lexical decision task reveals a decay of automatic semantic activation. Acta Psychol. 2010, 133:127-136.
28. Projekt Deutscher Wortschatz. Retrieved February 2005. http://wortschatz.uni-leipzig.de/.
29. Raaijmakers J.G.W., Schrijnemakers J.M.C., Gremmen F How to deal with " The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": common misconceptions and alternative solutions. J. Mem. Lang. 1999, 41:416-426.
30. Smith M.C., Bentin S., Spalek T.M. Attention constraints of semantic activation during visual word recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 2001, 27:1289-1298.
31. Stolz J.A., Besner D. Levels of representation in visual word recognition: a dissociation between morphological and semantic processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1998, 24:1643-1655.
32. Tse C.S., Neely J.H. Semantic priming from letter-searched primes occurs for low- but not high-frequency targets: automatic semantic access may not be a myth. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 2007, 33:1143-1161.