Design energy input spectra for moderate-to-high seismicity regions based on Colombian earthquakes

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1129-1148

  Benavent Climent, A ^a   Lopez Almansa F ^b   Bravo Gonzalez D A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Colombian earthquakes; Design spectra; Energy input spectra; Energy based seismic design; Seismic hazard

Indexed keywords

COLOMBIAN EARTHQUAKES; COLOMBIANS; DESIGN SPECTRUM; ENERGY INPUTS; ENERGY-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC HAZARDS;

DESIGN; EARTHQUAKES; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMICITY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

COLOMBIA; GREECE; IRAN; JAPAN; SPAIN;

EID: 77955549365     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.022     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Priestley M.J.N., Calvi G.M., Kowalsky M.J. Displacement-based seismic design of structures 2007, IUSS Press.
2. Fajfar P., Vidic T. Consistent inelastic design spectra: hysteretic and input energy. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994, 23:523-537.
3. Teran-Gilmore A., Jirsa J.O. Energy demands for seismic design against low-cycle fatigue. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007, 36:383-404.
4. Teran-Gilmore A., Jirsa J.O. A simple damage model for practical seismic design that accounts for low cycle fatigue. Earthquake Spectra 2005, 21(3):803-832.
5. Fajfar P. Equivalent ductility factors taking into account low-cycle fatigue. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1992, 21:837-848.
6. Krawinkler.H. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Engineering Structures 1988, 20:452-464.
7. Benavent-Climent.A. An energy-based damage model for seismic response of steel structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007, 36:1049-1064.
8. Chai.Y.H. Energy-based linear damage model for high-intensity seismic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 1995, 121(5):857-863.
9. Chai Y.H. Incorporating low-cycle fatigue model into duration-dependent inelastic design spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004, 34:83-96.
10. Erberik A., Sucuoglu H. Seismic energy dissipation in deteriorating systems through low cycle fatigue. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004, 33:49-67.
11. Sucuoglu H., Erberik A. Energy-based hysteresis and damage for deteriorating systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004, 33:69-88.
12. Housner G.W., Limit design of structures to resist earthquakes, In: Proceedings of the first world conference on earthquake engineering; 1956, vol. 5. p. 1-12.
13. Berg G.V., Thomaides S.S., Energy consumption by structures in strong-motion earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the second world conference on earthquake engineering; 1960, vol. 2. p. 681-97.
14. Kato B., Akiyama H. Energy input and damages in structures subjected to severe earthquakes. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Transactions of AIJ 1975, 235:9-18. in Japanese.
15. Housner G.W., Jennings P.C. The capacity of extreme earthquake motions to damage structures. Structural and Geotechnical Mechanics, A Volume Honoring Nathan M. Newmark 1977, 102-116.
16. Zahrah T.F., Hall W.J. Earthquake energy absorption in SDOF systems. Journal of Structural Engineering 1984, 110:1757-1772.
17. Akiyama H. Earthquake-resistant limit-state design for buildings 1985, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.
18. Kuwamura H., Galambos T.V. Earthquake load for structural reliability. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 1989, 115(6):1446-1462.
19. Uang C.M., Bertero V.V. Evaluation of seismic energy in structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1990, 77-90.
20. P. Fajfar, T. Vidic, M. Fischinger, On energy demand and supply in SDOF systems. In: proceedings of the nonlinear seismic analysis and design of reinforced concrete buildings. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 41-61, 1992.
21. McCabe S.L., Hall W.J. Assessment of seismic structural damage. Journal of Structural Engineering 1989, 115:2166-2183. 9.
22. Zhu T.J., Tso W.K. Design of torsionally unbalanced structural systems based on code provisions II: strength distribution. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1992, 21:629-644.
23. Building Standard Law of Japan, Notification no.631 of the ministry of land, infrastructure, transport and tourism. Earthquake-resistant structural calculation based on energy balance, Tokyo 2005.
24. Chou C.C., Uang C.M. Establishing absorbed energy spectra-an attenuation approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000, 29:1441-1455.
25. Ambraseys N.N., Douglas J. Near-field horizontal and vertical earthquake ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2003, 23:1-18.
26. Decanini L.D., Mollaioli F. Formulation of elastic earthquake input energy spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998, 27:1503-1522.
27. Benavent-Climent A., Pujades L.G., López-Almansa F. Design energy input spectra for moderate-seismicity regions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002, 31:1151-1172.
28. Amiri G.G., Darzi G.A., Amiri J.V. Design elastic input energy spectra based on Iranian earthquakes. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 2008, 35:635-646.
29. Tselentis GA, Danciu L, Sokos E, Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Greece. part ii: acceleration response spectra and elastic input energy spectra. Natural Hazards & Earth Science Systems, in press.
30. Decanini L.D., Mollaioli F. An energy-based methodology for the seismic assessment of seismic demand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2001, 21:113-137.
31. Kuwamura H., Kirino Y., Akiyama H. Prediction of earthquake energy input from smoothed Fourier amplitude spectrum. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994, 23:1125-1137.
32. R.S. Lawson, H. Krawinkler, Cumulative damage potential of seismic ground motion, In: Proceedings of the tenth european conference on earthquake engineering. 1995. p. 1079-86.
33. Manfredi G. Stime energetiche e potenziale di danno sismico, VII Convegno Nazionale: L'Ingenieria sismica in Italia. Siena 1995, 1(43-52). in italian.
34. Teran-Gilmore A., Performance-based earthquake-resistant design of framed buildings using energy concepts, Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, 1996.
35. Ingeominas: Instituto Colombiano de Geología y Minería, 2005. (In Spanish). http://www.ingeominas.gov.co/.
36. Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica, NSR-98. Normas Colombianas de Diseño y Construcción Sismo Resistente, 1998(In Spanish).
37. Rathje E.M., Faraj F., Russell S., Bray J.D. Empirical relationships for frequency content parameters of earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 2004, 20(1):119-144.
38. Bray J.D. Rodriguez-Marek A. Geotechnical site categories. In: Proceedings of the first PEER-PG&E workshop on seismic reliability of utility lifelines, San Francisco, CA; August 1997.
39. Rodriguez-Marek A., Bray J.D., Abrahamson N.A. An empirical geotechnical seismic site response procedure. Earthquake Spectra 2001, 17(1):65-87.
40. Rathje E.M., Abrahamson N.A., Bray J.D. Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions. Journal Of Geotechnical Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 1998, 124(2):150-159.
41. Utsu T. Relationships between magnitude scales. International handbook of earthquake & engineering seismology 2002, Elsevier, pp. 733-746.
42. Scherbaum F., Schmedes J., Cotton F. On the conversion of source-to-site distance measures for extended earthquake source models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2004, 94(3):1053-1069.
43. E. Cosenza, G. Manfredi, Some remarks on the evaluation and strengthening of underdesigned RC frame buildings. Technical report, NCEER-97-0003. State University of New York, Buffalo, 1997.
44. Manfredi G. Evaluation of seismic energy demand. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001, 30:485-499.
45. Vega J., del Rey I., Alarcón E. Pounding force assessment in performance-based design of bridges. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 2009, 38:1525-1544.
46. Clough R.W., Penzien J. Dynamics of structures 1993, McGraw Hill, New York.
47. Akiyama H. Earthquake-resistant design method for buildings based on energy balance 1999, Gihodo Shuppan, Tokyo, 25-26.
48. BSL. The building standard law of Japan. The Building Center of Japan, Tokyo. 2009 (English version on CD available in ). http://118.82.115.195/en/services/publication.html.
49. Cornell C.A. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1968, 58:1583-1606.
50. Esteva L. Seismic risk and seismic design decision. Seismic design for nuclear power plants 1970, Massachussetts Institute of Technology Press, p. 142-182.
51. Organization for Earthquake Resistant Planning and Protection, Ministry of environment planning and public works. Greek code for seismic resistant structures, EAK 2000.
52. R. MacGuire, Seismic structural response risk analysis incorporating peak response regressions on earthquake magnitude and distance. Research report R.. MIT Department of Civil Engineering; 1974.p. 74-51.
53. Seed H.B., Ugas C., Lysmer J. Site-dependent spectra for earthquake-resistant design. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1976, 66(1):221-243.
54. Dynamics of structures 1993, McGraw Hill, New York, 1-18. 2nd ed. R.W. Clough, J. Penzien (Eds.).