A non-conforming monolithic finite element method for problems of coupled mechanics

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 229, Issue 20, 2010, Pages 7571-7593

  Nordsletten, D ^a   Kay, D ^a   Smith, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian; Finite elasticity mechanics; Finite element method; Mortar domain decomposition; Navier Stokes; Non matching grids

Indexed keywords

ELASTICITY; INTERPOLATION; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NEWTONIAN LIQUIDS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ARBITRARY LAGRANGIAN EULERIAN; DOMAIN DECOMPOSITIONS; ELASTICITY MECHANICS; FINITE ELASTICITY; FINITE ELASTICITY MECHANIC; MONOLITHICS; MORTAR/DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION; MULTIPLIER TECHNIQUES; NAVIER STOKES; NON-MATCHING GRID;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 77955516434     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.05.043     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Amestoy P., Duff I., L'Excellent J. Multifrontal parallel distributed symmetric and unsymmetric solvers. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2000, 184:501-520.
2. Antoci C., Gallati M., Sibilla S. Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction by sph. Comput. Struct. 2007, 85:879-890.
3. Arbogast T., Cowsar L., Wheeler M., Yotov I. Mixed finite element methods on nonmatching multiblock grids. SIAM.J. Numer. Anal. 2000, 37:1295-1315.
4. Arbogast T., Yotov I. A non-mortar mixed finite element method for elliptic problems on non-matching multiblock grids. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1997, 149:255-265.
5. Baaijens F. A fictitious domain/mortar element method for fluid-structure interaction. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2001, 35:743-761.
6. Babuska I. The finite element method with Lagrange multipliers. Numer. Math. 1973, 20:179-192.
7. Babuska I., Podnos E., Rodin G. New fictitious domain methods: Formulation and analysis. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 2005, 15:1575-1594.
8. Bathe K., Ledezma G. Benchmark problems for incompressible fluid flows with structural interactions. Comput. Struct. 2007, 85:628-644.
9. Bathe K., Zhang H. Finite element developments for general fluid flows with structural interactions. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2004, 60:213-232.
10. Belgacem F., Bernardi C., Chorfi N., Maday Y. Inf-sup conditions for the mortar spectral element discretization of the Stokes problem. Numer. Math. 2000, 85:257-281.
11. Belgacem F., Hild P., Laborde P. The mortar finite element method for contact problems. Math. Comput. Model. 1998, 28:263-271.
12. Bertrand F., Tanguy P., Thibault F. A three-dimensional fictitious domain method for incompressible fluid flow problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 1997, 25:719-736.
13. Bonet J., Wood R. Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis 1997, Cambridge University Press.
14. Brezzi F., existence On the uniqueness and approximation of saddle-point problems arising from Lagrange multipliers. R.A.I.R.O. 1974, 2:129-151.
15. Brezzi F., Fortin M. Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods 1991, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
16. Cervera M., Codina R., Galindo M. On the computational efficiency and implementation of block-iterative algorithms for nonlinear coupled problems. Eng. Comput. 1994, 13:4-30.
17. Cheng Y., Oertel H., Schenkel T. Fluid-structure coupled cfd simulation of the left ventricular flow during filling phase. Biomed. Eng. A 2005, 8:567-576.
18. Cho Y., Jun S., Im S., Hyun-Gyu K. An improved interface element with variable nodes for non-matching finite element meshes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2005, 194:3022-3046.
19. Dennis J., Schnabel R. Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations 1996, SIAM, Prentice-Hall Inc., NJ.
20. Deparis S., Fernandez M., Formaggia L. Acceleration of a fixed point algorithm for fluid-structure interaction using transpiration conditions. ESAIM:M2AN 2003, 37:601-616.
21. Dettmer W., Peri D. A computational framework for fluid-structure interaction: finite element formulation and applications. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2006, 195:5754-5779.
22. Eisenstat S., Walker H. Globally convergent inexact newton methods. SIAM J Opt. 1994, 4:393-422.
23. Elman H., Kay D., Silvester D.J., Wathen A. Efficient preconditioning of the linearized Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2001, 128:261-279.
24. Fadlun E., Verzicco R., Orlandi P., Mohd-Yusof J. Combined immersed-boundary finite-difference methods for three-dimensional complex flow simulations. J Comput. Phys. 2000, 161:35-60.
25. Farhat C., Lesoinne M., LeTallec P. Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1998, 157:95-114.
26. Farhat C., Lesoinne M., Maman N. Explicit/implicit time integration of coupled aeroelastic problems: three-field formulation, geometric conservation and distributed solution. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 1994, 21:807-835.
27. Girault V., Blowinski R., Lopez H., Vila J. A boundary multiplier/fictitious domain method for the steady incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Numer. Math. 2001, 88:75-103.
28. Girault V., Raviart P.A. Finite Element Methods for the Navier-Stokes Equations 1986, Springer-Verlag.
29. Glowinski R., Pan T., Periaux J. Numerical simulation of a multi-store separation phenomenon: a ficticious domain approach. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2006, 195:5566-5581.
30. Greenshields C., Weller H. A unified formulation for continuum mechanics applied to fluid-structure interaction in flexible tubes. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2005, 64:1575-1593.
31. Gresho P. Incompressible fluid dynamics: some fundamental formulation issues. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1991, 23:413-453.
32. Gresho P., Sani R. Incompressible flow and the finite element method I advection-diffusion 1998, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
33. Gresho P., Sani R. Incompressible flow and the finite element method II, isothermal laminar flow 1998, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
34. De Hart J., Peters G., Schreuers P., Baaijens F. A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve. J. Biomech. 2003, 36:103-112.
35. Heil M. An efficient solver for the fully coupled solution of large-displacement fluid-structure interaction problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2008, 43:91-101.
36. Heil M., Hazel A., Boyle J. Solvers for large-displacement fluid-structure interaction problems: segregated versus monolithic approaches. Comput. Mech. 2008, 43:91-101.
37. Heinstein M., Laursen T. A three-dimensional surface-to-surface projection algorithm for non-coincident domains. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2003, 69:277-324.
38. Coook J., Hirt C., Amsden A. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds. J. Comput. Phys. 1974, 14:227-253.
39. Hron J., Madlik M. Fluid-structure interaction with applications in biomechanics. Nonlinear Anal. Real. World Appl. 2007, 8:1431-1458.
40. Huerta A., Wing L.K. Viscous flow with large free surface motion. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1988, 69:277-324.
41. Kay D., Loghin D., Wathen A.J. A preconditioner for the steady-state Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2002, 24:237-256.
42. Ladyzhenskaya O. The Mathematical Theory of Viscous Incompressible Flow 1969, Gordon and Breach.
43. Lemmon J., Yoganathan A. Computational modeling of left heart diastolic function: examination of ventricular dysfunction. J. Elasticity 2000, 122:297-303.
44. Liu H., Krishnan S., Marella S., Udaykumar H. Sharp interface cartesian grid method. II: A technique for simulating droplet interactions with surfaces of arbitrary shape. J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 210:32-54.
45. Malvern LE. Introduction to the Mechanics of Continuous Medium 1969, Prentice-Hall.
46. Marella S., Krishnan S., Liu H., Udaykumar H. Sharp interface cartesian grid method I: An easily implemented technique for 3d moving boundary computations. J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 210:1-31.
47. McQueen D., Peskin C. A 3d computational method for blood flow in the heart. II. Contractile fibers. J. Comput. Phys. 1989, 82:289.
48. McQueen D., Peskin C. A three-dimensional computer model of the human heart for studying cardiac fluid dynamics. Comput. Graph. 2000, 34:56-60.
49. McVittie G. A systematic treatment of moving axes in hydrodynamics. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 1949, 196:285-300.
50. M. Nash, Mechanics and Material Properties of the Heart using an Anatomically Accurate Mathematical Model, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland, 1998.
51. Nash M., Hunter P. Computational mechanics of the heart. J. Elasticity 2000, 61:113-141.
52. Nicolaides R. Existence, uniqueness and approximation for generalized saddle point problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1982, 19:349-357.
53. F. Nobile, Numerical approximation of fluid-structure interaction problems with application to haemodynamics, Ph.D. Thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 2001.
54. D. Nordsletten, Fluid-Solid Coupling for the Simulation of Left Ventricular Mechanics, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Oxford, 2009.
55. Nordsletten D., Hunter P., Smith N. Conservative and non-conservative arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian forms for ventricular flows. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2008, 56:1457-1463.
56. Nordsletten D., Smith N. Triangulation of p-order parametric surfaces. J. Sci. Comput. 2007, 34:308-335.
57. D. Nordsletten, N. Smith, D. Kay, A non-conforming monolithic finite element method for problems of coupled mechanics: Linear analysis, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., in review.
58. Nordsletten D., Smith N., Kay D. A preconditioner for the finite element approximation to the ALE Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2010, 32:521-543.
59. Perktold K., Rappitsch G. Computer simulation of local blood flow and vessel mechanics in a compliant carotid artery bifurcation model. J. Biomech. 1995, 28:845-856.
60. Quarteroni A., Valli A. Numerical Approximation of Partial Differential Equations 1994, Springer-Verlag.
61. Ramiere I., Angot P., Belliard M. A fictitious domain approach with spread interface for elliptic problems with general boundary conditions. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2007, 29:766-781.
62. Shankar V., Ide H. Aeroelastic computations of flexible configurations. Comput. Struct. 1988, 30:15-28.
63. Slone A., Pericleous K., Bailey C., Cross M., Bennett C. Aeroelastic computations of flexible configurations. Appl. Math. Model. 2004, 28:211-239.
64. Temam R. Navier-Stokes Equations and Non-linear Functional Analysis 1983, SIAM.
65. Temam R. Navier-Stokes Equations. Theory and Numerical Analysis 1984, North-Holland.
66. Unger R., Haupt M., Horst P. Application of Lagrange multipliers for coupled problems in fluid and structural interactions. Comput. Struct. 2007, 85:796-809.
67. Wang X., Liu W. Extended immersed-boundary method using fem and rkpm. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2004, 193:1305-1321.
68. Warsi Z. Conservation form of the Navier-Stokes equations in general nonsteady coordinates. AIAA J. 1980, 19:240-242.
69. Watanabe H., et al. Multiphysics simulation of left ventricular filling dynamics using fluid-structure interaction finite element method. Biophys. J. 2004, 87:2074-2085.
70. A.J. Wathen, D. Loghin, D. Kay, H.C. Elman, D.J. Silvester. A new preconditioner for the Oseen equations. in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications, 2001.
71. Yang Y., Udaykumar H. Sharp interface cartesian grid method. III: Solidification of pure materials and binary solutions. J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 210:55-74.
72. Zhang H., Camarero R., Kahawita R. Conservation form of the equations of fluid dynamics in general nonsteady coordinates. AIAA J. 1985, 22:1819-1822.