Risk-sensitive events during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The influence of the integrated operating room and a preoperative checklist tool

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1990-1995

  Buzink, Sonja N ^a,b   Van Lier, Lotte ^a,b   De Hingh, Ignace H J T ^b   Jakimowicz, Jack J ^a,b  

^a FACULTY OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING   (Netherlands)

^b CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adverse events; Checklist; Human factors; Integrated OR; Patient safety; Time out

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; OPERATING ROOM; PATIENT SAFETY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; QUALITY CONTROL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL ERROR; SURGICAL RISK; CHECKLIST; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RISK FACTOR; SAFETY; STANDARDS;

CHECKLIST; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; OPERATING ROOMS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RISK FACTORS; SAFETY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 77955514181     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0892-6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M Moore C Bennett 1995 The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 170 55 59 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80252-9 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzhtlyjsQ%3D%3D 7793496
2. A Gallagher C Smith 2003 From the operating room of the present to the operating room of the future. Human-factors lessons learned from the minimally invasive surgery revolution Semin Laparosc Surg 10 127 139 14551655
3. S Dincler P Buchmann 2004 Evaluation of operational skills by learning curve Chir Gastroenterol 20 16 19 10.1159/000083348 (Pubitemid 41505012)
4. K Catchpole A Mishra A Handa P McCulloch 2008 Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles Ann Surg 247 699 706 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181642ec8 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3gsVaguw%3D%3D 18362635 (Pubitemid 351440623)
5. C Vincent K Moorthy SK Sarker A Chang AW Darzi 2004 Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement Ann Surg 239 475 482 10.1097/01.sla.0000118753.22830.41 15024308 (Pubitemid 38372763)
6. Leape L (1994) The preventability of medical injury. In: Bogner M (ed) Human error in medicine. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 13-25
7. van der Wal G (2007) Risico's minimaal invasieve chirurgie onderschat. (Risks minimally invasive surgery underestimated). Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg (Dutch Healthcare Inspectorate), Den Haag, The Netherlands. http://www.igz.nl/publicaties/rapporten/2007/mic
8. J Reason 2000 Human error: models and management Br Med J 320 768 770 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7osFChtQ%3D%3D
9. TAG Kenyon DR Urbach JB Speer B Waterman-Hukari GF Foraker PD Hansen LL Swanström 2001 Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency Surg Endosc 15 1140 1143 10.1007/s004640080092 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnotV2itQ%3D%3D 11727087 (Pubitemid 32929165)
10. A Alarcon R Berguer 1996 A comparison of operating room crowding between open and laparoscopic operations Surg Endosc 10 916 919 10.1007/BF00188483 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7ksl2jug%3D%3D 8703151
11. DM Herron M Gagner TL Kenyon LL Swanström 2001 The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century Surg Endosc 15 415 10.1007/s004640080134 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fht1yhuw%3D%3D 11409412 (Pubitemid 32385199)
12. NM Saufl 2004 Universal protocol for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong person surgery J Perianesth Nurs 19 348 351 10.1016/S1089-9472(04)00287-4 15472884
13. AB Haynes TG Weiser WR Berry SR Lipsitz AH Breizat EP Dellinger T Herbosa S Joseph PL Kibatala MC Lapitan AF Merry K Moorthy RK Reznick B Taylor AA Gawande 2009 A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population N Engl J Med 360 491 499 10.1056/NEJMsa0810119 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXht1Wku7w%3D 19144931
14. L Lingard G Regehr B Orser R Reznick GR Baker D Doran S Espin J Bohnen S Whyte 2008 Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication Arch Surg 143 12 17 10.1001/archsurg.2007.21 18209148 (Pubitemid 351159287)
15. S Nundy A Mukherjee JB Sexton PJ Pronovost A Knight LC Rowen M Duncan D Syin MA Makary 2008 Impact of preoperative briefings on operating room delays: a preliminary report Arch Surg 143 1068 1072 10.1001/archsurg.143.11.1068 19015465
16. EG Verdaasdonk LP Stassen WF Hoffmann M van der Elst J Dankelman 2008 Can a structured checklist prevent problems with laparoscopic equipment? Surg Endosc 22 2238 2243 10.1007/s00464-008-0029-3 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cnhsl2jsw%3D%3D 18597142
17. van Lier L (2008) Design of a digital checklist interface for preparing laparoscopic procedures. MSc Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft
18. M Hertzum NE Jacobsen 2003 The evaluator effect: a chilling fact about usability evaluation methods Int J Hum-Comput Int 15 183 204 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1501-14
19. EG Verdaasdonk LP Stassen M van der Elst TM Karsten J Dankelman 2007 Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery. An observational study Surg Endosc 21 275 279 10.1007/s00464-006-0019-2 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2s%2Fit1OksA%3D%3D 17122973 (Pubitemid 46122417)
20. S Courdier O Garbin M Hummel V Thoma E Ball R Favre A Wattiez 2009 Equipment failure: causes and consequences in endoscopic gynecologic surgery J Minim Invas Gyn 16 28 33 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.08.019
21. Geertsma RE (2008) Nieuwe technologieën. Rapportage ten behoeve van SGZ-2008. Bilthoven: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM). Report no.: 360004002/2008. http://www.igz.nl/publicaties/ staatvandegezondheidszorg/sgz-2008
22. E Norton 2007 Implementing the universal protocol hospital-wide AORN J 85 1187 1197 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.03.002 17560857