Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus open surgical repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms based on worldwide experience

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 174-182

  Hayes, Paul D ^a   Sadat, Umar ^a   Walsh, Stewart R ^a   Noorani, Ayesha ^a   Tang, Tjun Y ^a   Bowden, David J ^a   Gillard, Jonathan H ^a   Boyle, Jonathan R ^a  

^a CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Cost effectiveness analysis; Cost effectiveness ratio; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Open repair; Quality adjusted life year; Rupture

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AORTA RECONSTRUCTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMERGENCY CARE; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURGICAL PATIENT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; AORTA RUPTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECONOMICS; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; MALE; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MALE; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, ECONOMIC; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS;

EID: 77955492540     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: 15451550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/09-2941.1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, et al. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:843-848.
2. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1607-1618.
3. Prinssen M, Buskens E, Tutein Nolthenius RP, et al. Sexual dysfunction after conventional and endovascular AAA repair: results of the DREAM randomized trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:613-620. (Pubitemid 40110737)
4. Lottman PE, Laheij RJ, Cuypers PW, et al. Health-related quality of life outcomes following elective open or endovascular AAA repair: a randomized controlled trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:323-329. (Pubitemid 38802616)
5. Sadat U, Boyle JR, Walsh SR, et al. Endovascular vs open repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:227-236.
6. Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M, et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2398-2405. (Pubitemid 40958436)
7. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:2179-2186.
8. Visser JJ, van Sambeek MR, Hamza TH, et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: endovascular repair versus open surgery: systematic review. Radiology. 2007;245:122-129. (Pubitemid 47417795)
9. Greco G, Egorova N, Anderson PL, et al. Outcomes of endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:453-459.
10. Filipovic M, Seagroatt V, Goldacre MJ. Differences between women and men in surgical treatment and case fatality rates for ruptured aortic abdominal aneurysm in England. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1096-1099. (Pubitemid 350082854)
11. National Schedule of Reference Costs 2005-06 (Appendix NSRC4). Available at: http://www.dh. gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-062884. Last accessed March 8, 2010.
12. Tambyraja AL, Fraser SC, Murie JA, et al. Quality of life after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28:229-233. (Pubitemid 39069354)
13. UCLH NHS Trust. Provider to provider tariff 2006/07. Vascular Laboratory: Cost per Duplex scan.
14. Hinchliffe RJ, Bruijstens L, Macsweeney ST, et al. A randomized trial of endovascular and open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm - results of a pilot study and lessons learned for future studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32:506-513. (Pubitemid 44490336)
15. Boyle JR, Gibbs PJ, Kruger A, et al. Existing delays following the presentation of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm allow sufficient time to assess patients for endovascular repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29:505-509. (Pubitemid 40973846)
16. Moore R, Nutley M, Cina CS, et al. Improved survival after introduction of an emergency endovascular therapy protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:443-450. (Pubitemid 46281531)
17. Kapma MR, Groen H, Oranen BI, et al. Emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with a preferential endovascular strategy: mortality and cost-effectiveness analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:777-784. (Pubitemid 350250772)
18. Visser JJ, van Sambeek MR, Hunink MG, et al. Acute abdominal aortic aneurysms: cost analysis of endovascular repair and open surgery in hemodynamically stable patients with 1-year follow-up. Radiology. 2006;240:681-689. (Pubitemid 44267323)
19. Mehta M, Taggert J, Darling RC, et al. Establishing a protocol for endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: outcomes of a prospective analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1-8. (Pubitemid 43975276)