Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: Endovascular repair versus open surgery - Systematic review

Radiology

Volumn 245, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 122-129

  Visser, Jacob J ^a   Van Sambeek, Marc R H M ^a   Hamza, Taye H ^a   Hunink, M G Myriam ^a,b   Bosch, Johanna L ^a,c  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ANEURYSM RUPTURE; ANEURYSM SURGERY; AORTA SURGERY; ARTICLE; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34548681219     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2451061204     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Yusuf SW, Whitaker SC, Chuter TA, Wenham PW, Hopkinson BR. Emergency endovascular repair of leaking aortic aneurysm [letter]. Lancet. 1994;344:1645.
2. Leon LR Jr, Labropoulos N, Laredo J, Rodriguez HE, Kalman PG. To what extent has endovascular aneurysm repair influenced abdominal aortic aneurysm management in the state of Illinois? J Vasc Surg 2005;41:568-574.
3. Hinchliffe RJ, Yusuf SW, Macierewicz JA, MacSweeney ST, Wenham PW, Hopkinson BR. Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a challenge to open repair? results of a single centre experience in 20 patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001;22:528-534.
4. van Sambeek MR, van Dijk LC, Hendriks JM, et al. Endovascular versus conventional open repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm: feasibility and preliminary results. J Endovasc Ther 2002;9:443-448.
5. Veith FJ, Ohki T. Endovascular approaches to ruptured infrarenal aorto-iliac aneurysms. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2002;43:369-378.
6. Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M, et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2398-2405.
7. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial I): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:2179-2180.
8. Peppelenbosch N, Yilmaz N, von Marrewijk C, et al. Emergency treatment of acute symptomatic or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: outcome of a prospective intent-to-treat by EVAR protocol. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003;26:303-310.
9. Reichart M, Geelkerken RH, Huisman AB, van Det RJ, de Smit P, Volker EP. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular repair is feasible in 40% of patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003;26:479-486.
10. Resch T, Malina M, Lindblad B, Dias NV, Sonesson B, Ivancev K. Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: logistics and short-term results. J Endovasc Ther 2003;10:440-446.
11. Alsac JM, Desgranges P, Kobeiter H, Becquemin JP. Emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: feasibility and comparison of early results with conventional open repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005;30:632-639.
12. Brandt M, Walluscheck KP, Jahnke T, Graw K, Cremer J, Muller-Hulsbeck S. Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: feasibility and impact on early outcome. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005;16:1309-1312.
13. Castelli P, Caronno R, Piffaretti G, et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular treatment. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:263-269.
14. Kapma MR, Verhoeven EL, Tielfiu IF, et al. Endovascular treatment of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm with a bifurcated stentgraft. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005;29:510-515.
15. Larzon T, Lindgren R, Norgren L. Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a shift of the paradigm? J Endovasc Ther 2005;12:548-555.
16. Vaddineni SK, Russo GC, Patterson MA, Taylor SM, Jordan WD Jr. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a retrospective assessment of open versus endovascular repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2005;19:782-786.
17. Franks S, Lloyd G, Fishwick G, Bown M, Sayers R. Endovascular treatment of ruptured and symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;31:345-350.
18. Stone PW. Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidence-based practice. Appl Nurs Res 2002;15:197-198.
19. ISI WEB OF KNOWLEDGE: WEB OF SCIENCE [database online]. Philadelphia, Pa: Thomson Scientific, 2006. http://portal.isiknowledge.com/. Accessed March 2, 2006.
20. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-188.
21. Begg CB, Berlin JA. Publication bias: a problem in interpreting medical data. J R Stat Soc 1988;151:419-463.
22. Johansen K, Kohler TR, Nicholls SC, Zierler RE, Clowes AW, Kazmers A. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Harborview experience. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:240-245.
23. Halpern VJ, Kline RG, D'Angelo AJ, Cohen JR. Factors that affect the survival rate of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:939-945.
24. Turton EP, Scott DJ, Delbridge M, Snowden S, Kester RC. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a novel method of outcome prediction using neural network technology. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;19:184-189.
25. Sharpe N. Clinical trials and the real world: selection bias and generalisability of trial results. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2002;16:75-77.
26. Lloyd-Williams F, Mair F, Shiels C, et al. Why are patients in clinical trials of heart failure not like those we see in everyday practice? J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:1157-1162.
27. Hordijk-Trion M, Lenzen M, Wijns W, et al. Patients enrolled in coronary intervention trials are not representative of patients in clinical practice: results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization. Eur Heart J 2006;27:671-678.
28. Egger M, Juni P, Bartlett C, Holenstein F, Sterne J. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? empirical study. Health Technol Assess 2003;7:1-76.
29. Moher D, Pham B, Lawson ML, Klassen TP. The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess 2003;7:1-90.
30. Sampram ES, Karafa MT, Mascha EJ, et al. Nature, frequency, and predictors of secondary procedures after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:930-937.
31. Hobo R, Buth J. Secondary interventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using current endografts: a EUROSTAR report. J Vasc Surg 2006;43:896-902.
32. Visser JJ, van Sambeek MR, Hunink MG, et al. Acute abdominal aortic aneurysms; cost analysis of endovascular repair and open surgery in hemodynamically stable patients with 1-year follow-up. Radiology 2006;240:681-689.
33. A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. The Standards of Reporting Trials Group. JAMA 1994;272:1926-1931. [Published correction appears in JAMA 1995;273:776.]
34. Checklist of information for inclusion in reports of clinical trials. The Asilomar Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:741-743.
35. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276:637-639.