Analysis of emergent fault element behavior in Virtual California

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1665-1683

  Glasscoe, Margaret T ^a   Granat, Robert A ^a   Rundle, John B ^b   Rundle, Paul B ^b   Donnellan, Andrea ^a   Kellogg, Louise H ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Earthquake physics; Emergent phenomena; Numerical simulation; Statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EARTHQUAKES; FAULTING; STATISTICAL PHYSICS;

EARTHQUAKE PHYSICS; EMERGENT PHENOMENON; FAULT INTERACTIONS; GAIN INSIGHT; GEOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; LARGE DATASETS; SMALL SCALE; STRESS INTERACTION;

STATISTICAL METHODS;

EID: 77955486808     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: 15320634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.1546     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Rundle PB, Rundle JB, Tiampo KF, Sa Martins JS, McGinnis S, Klein W. Nonlinear network dynamics on earthquake fault systems. Physical Review Letters 2001;87(14):148501 (1-4).
2. Rundle JB. A physical model for earthquakes 2. Applications to Southern California. Journal of Geophysical Research 1988;93(B6):6255-6274.
3. Rundle JB, Rundle PB, Donnellan A, Turcotte DL, Shcherbakov R, Li P, Malamud BD, Grant LB, Fox GC, McLeod D, Yakovlev Parker J, Klein W, Tiampo KW. A simulation-based approach to forecasting the next great San Francisco earthquake. Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences 2005;102(43):15363-15367.
4. Rundle JB, Rundle PB, Donnellan A, Fox G. Gutenburg-Richter statistics in topologically realistic systems-level earthquake stress-evolution simulations. Earth Planets and Space 2004;56:761-771.
5. Rundle JB, Rundle PB, Klein W, De Sa Martins J, Tiampo KF, Donnellan A, Kellogg LH. GEM Plate boundary simulations for the Plate Boundary Observatory: A program for understanding the physics of earthquakes on complex fault networks via observations, theory and numerical simulation. Pure and Applied Geophysics 2002;159:2357-2381.
6. Toda S, Stein RS, Richards-Dinger K, Bozkurt SB. Forecasting the evolution of seismicity in southern California: Animations built on earthquake stress transfer. Journal of Geophysical Research 2005;110(B05S16). DOI: 10/1029/2004JB003415.
7. Jaumé SC, Sykes LR. Change in state of stress on the southern San Andreas fault resulting from the California earthquake sequence of April to June 1992. Science 1992;258:1325-1328.
8. Hill DP, Reasenberg PA, Michael A, Arabaz WJ, Beroza G, Brumbagh D, Brune JN, Castro R, Davis S, dePolo D, Ellsworth WL, Gomberg J, Harmsen S, House L, Jackson SM, Johnston M J S, Jones L, Keller R, Malone S, Munguia L, Nava S, Pechmann JC, Sanford A, Simpson RW, Smith RB, Stark M, Stickney M, Vidal A, Walter S, Wong V, Zollweg J. Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 Landers, California earthquake. Science 1993;260:1617-1623.
9. Rockwell TK, Lindvall S, Herzberg M, Murbach D, Dawson T, Berger G. Paleoseismology of the Johnson Valley, Kickapoo, and Homestead Valley faults: Clustering of earthquakes in the Eastern California Shear Zone. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2000;90(5):1200-1236.
10. Weldon R, Scharer K, Fumal T, Biasi G. Wrightwood and the earthquake cycle: What a long recurrence record tells us about how faults work. GSA Today 2004;14(9):4-10. DOI: 10.1130/10520-5173 (2004) 014.
11. Dolan JF, Sieh K, Rockwell TK, Yeats RS, Shaw J, Suppe J, Huftile GJ, Gath EM. Prospects for larger or more frequent earthquakes in the Los Angeles metropolitan region. Science 1995;267(5195):199-205.
12. Dolan JF, Bowman DD, Sammis CG. Long-range and long-term fault interactions in southern California. Geology 2007;35(9):855-858. DOI: 10.1130/G23789A.1. (Pubitemid 47433794)
13. Schaff DP, Bokelmann G H R, Beroza GC, Waldhauser F, Ellsworth WL. High-resolution image of Calaveras fault seismicity. Journal of Geophysical Research 2002;107(B9):2186. DOI: 10.1029/2001JB000633.
14. Teyssier C, Tikroff B, Markley M. Oblique plate motion and continental tectonics. Geology 1995;23(5):447-450.
15. Titus SJ, De Mets C, Tikoff B. New slip rate estimates for the creeping segment of the San Andreas fault California. Geology 2005;33(3):205-208.
16. Toppozada TR, Branum DM, Reichle MS, Hallstrom CL. San Andreas fault zone California: M 5.5 earthquake history. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2002;92(7):2555-2601.
17. Thatcher W. Nonlinear strain buildup and the earthquake cycle on the San Andreas fault. Journal of Geophysical Research 1983;88(B7):5893-5902.
18. Cohn SN, Allen CR, Gilman R, Goulty NR. Preearthquake sand postearthquake creep in the Imperial fault and the Brawley fault zone. The Imperial Valley Earthquake of October 15 1979, U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1254, 1982;161-167.
19. Johnson CE, Hadley DM. Tectonic implications of the Brawley earthquake swarm, Imperial Valley, California, January, 1975. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1976;66(4):1133-1144.
20. Holliday JR, Rundle JB, Turcotte DL, Klein W, Tiampo KF, Donnellan A. Space-time clustering and correlations of major earthquakes. Physical Review Letters 2006;97(23):238501 (1-4).
21. Chen C, Rundle JB, Li H.-C., Holliday JR, Turcotte DL, Tiampo KF. Critical point theory of earthquakes: Observation of correlated and cooperative behavior of faults. Geophysical Research Letters 2006;33(L18302). DOI: 10.1029/2006GL027323. (Pubitemid 351147882)
22. Baiesi M, Paczuski M. Complex network of earthquakes and aftershocks. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics 2005;12:1-11.