Data acquisition and pre-processing standards for electrical neuroimaging

Electrical Neuroimaging

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 79-92

  Michel, Christoph M ^a   Brandeis, Daniel ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; ELECTRODES; IMPORTANCE SAMPLING; NEUROIMAGING; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

ARTIFACT DETECTION; MULTICHANNEL EEG; POTENTIAL ANALYSIS; POTENTIAL FIELD; REFERENCE PROBLEMS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL NORMALIZATION; SPATIAL SAMPLING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 77955469251     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511596889.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Desmedt JE, Tomberg C, Noel P, Ozaki I. Beware of the average reference in brain mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Suppl. 1990; 41:22-27.
2. Tomberg C, Noel P, Ozaki I, Desmedt JE. Inadequacy of the average reference for the topographic mapping of focal enhancements of brain potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1990;77:259-265.
3. Junghofer M, Elbert T, Tucker DM, Braun C. The polar average reference effect: a bias in estimating the head surface integral in EEG recording. Clinical Neurophysiology 1999;110:1149-1155.
4. Gencer NG, Williamson SJ, Gueziec A, Hummel R. Optimal reference electrode selection for electric source imaging. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1996;99:163-173.
5. Williamson SJ, Lu ZL, Karron D, Kaufman L. Advantages and limitations of magnetic source imaging. Brain Topography 1991;4: 169-180.
6. Wikswo JPJ, Gevins A, Williamson SJ.The future of EEG and MEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1993;87:1-9.
7. Pataraia E, Baumgartner C, Lindinger G, Deecke L. Magnetoencephalography in presurgical epilepsy evaluation. Neurosurgery Review 2002;25:141-159.
8. Barkley GL. Controversies in neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Pro. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004;115:1001-1009.
9. Pascual-Marqui RD, Lehmann D. Topographic maps, source localization inference, and the reference electrode: comments on a paper by Desmedt et al. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1993;88:532-536.
10. Geselowitz DB.The zero of potential. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 1998;17:128-132.
11. Lehmann DSW. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1980;48:609-621.
12. Michel CM, Murray MM, Lantz G et al. EEG source imaging. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004;115:2195-2222.
13. Murray MM, Brunet D, Michel CM. Topographic ERP analyses: a step-by-step tutorial review. Brain Topography 2008;20:249-264.
14. Picton TW, Bentin S, Berg P et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 2000;37:127-152.
15. Luck SJ. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005.
16. Nuwer M. Assessment of digital EEG, quantitative EEG, and EEG brain mapping: report of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Neurology 1997;49:277-292.
17. Michel CM, Lantz G, Spinelli L et al. 128-channel EEG source imaging in epilepsy: clinical yield and localization precision. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 2004;21:71-83.
18. Holmes MD. Dense array EEG: methodology and new hypothesis on epilepsy syndromes. Epilepsia 2008;49:3-14.
19. Li T-H, North G. Aliasing effects and sampling theorems of SRFs when sampled on a finite grid. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 1996;49:341-354.
20. Grieve PG, Emerson RG, Isler JR, Stark RI. Quantitative analysis of spatial sampling error in the infant and adult electroencephalogram. Neuroimage 2004;21: 1260-1274.
21. Srinivasan R, Nunez PL, Tucker DM, Silberstein RB, Cadusch PJ. Spatial sampling and filtering of EEG with spline laplacians to estimate cortical potentials. Brain Topography 1996;8:355-366.
22. Srinivasan R, Tucker DM, Murias M. Estimating the spatial Nyquist of the human EEG. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 1998;30:8-19.
23. Ryynänen OR, Hyttinen JA, Laarne PH, Malmivuo JA. Effect of electrode density and measurement noise on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2004;51:1547-1554.
24. Ryynänen OR, Hyttinen JA, Malmivuo JA. Effect of measurement noise and electrode density on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution with different resistivity values for the skull. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2006;53:1851-1858.
25. Spitzer AR, Cohen LG, Fabrikant J, Hallett M. A method for determining optimal interelectrode spacing for cerebral topographic mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1989;72:355-361.
26. Gevins A, Brickett P, Costales B, Le J, Reutter B. Beyond topographic mapping: towards functional-anatomical imaging with 124-channel EEGs and 3-D MRIs. Brain Topography 1990;3:53-64.
27. Freeman WJ, Holmes MD, Burke BC, Vanhatalo S. Spatial spectra of scalp EEG and EMG from awake humans. Clinical Neurophysiology 2003;114:1053-1068.
28. Luu P, Tucker DM, Englander R et al. Localizing acute stroke-related EEG changes: assessing the effects of spatial undersampling. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 2001;18:302-317.
29. Lantz G, Grave de Peralta R, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Michel CM. Epileptic source localization with high density EEG: how many electrodes are needed? Clinical Neurophysiology 2003;114:63-69.
30. Grave de Peralta R, Gonzalez S, Lantz G, Michel CM, Landis T. Noninvasive localization of electromagnetic epileptic activity. I. Method descriptions and simulations. Brain Topography 2001;14: 131-137.
31. Spinelli L, Andino SG, Lantz G, Seeck M, Michel CM. Electromagnetic inverse solutions in anatomically constrained spherical head models. Brain Topography 2000;13:115-125.
32. Ary JP, Klein SA, Fender DH. Location of sources of evoked scalp potentials: corrections for skull and scalp thicknesses. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1981;128:447-452.
33. Rush S, Driscoll DA. EEG electrode sensitivity-an application of reciprocity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1969;16:15-22.
34. Malmivuo JA, Suihko VE. Effect of skull resistivity on the spatial resolutions of EEG and MEG. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2004;51:1276-1280.
35. Oostendorp TF, Delbeke J, Stegeman DF. The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2000;47:1487-1492.
36. Hoekema R, Wieneke GH, Leijten FS et al. Measurement of the conductivity of skull, temporarily removed during epilepsy surgery. Brain Topography 2003;16:29-38.
37. Lai Y, van Drongelen W, Ding L et al. Estimation of in vivo human brain-to-skull conductivity ratio from simultaneous extraand intra-cranial electrical potential recordings. Clinical Neurophysiology 2005;116:456-465.
38. Fifer WP, Grieve PG, Grose-Fifer J, Isler JR, Byrd D. High-density electroencephalogram monitoring in the neonate. Clinical Perinatology 2006;33: 679-691, vii.
39. Ferree TC, Eriksen KJ, Tucker DM. Regional head tissue conductivity estimation for improved EEG analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2000;47:1584-1592.
40. Sperli F, Spinelli L, Seeck M et al. EEG source imaging in paediatric epilepsy surgery: a new perspective in presurgical workup. Epilepsia 2006;47:981-990.
41. Van Hoey G, De Clercq J, Vanrumste B et al. EEG dipole source localization using artificial neural networks. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2000;45:997-1011.
42. Khosla D, Don M, Kwong B. Spatial mislocalization of EEG electrodes-effects on accuracy of dipole estimation. Clinical Neurophysiology 1999;110:261-271.
43. Wang Y, Gotman J. The influence of electrode location errors on EEG dipole source localization with a realistic head model. Clinical Neurophysiology 2001;112: 1777-1780.
44. Tucker DM. Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1993;87:154-163.
45. De Munck JC, Vijn PC, Spekreijse H. A practical method for determining electrode positions on the head. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1991;78:85-87.
46. Le J, Lu M, Pellouchoud E, Gevins A. A rapid method for determining standard 10/10 electrode positions for high resolution EEG studies. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1998;106:554-558.
47. Koessler L, Maillard L, Benhadid A et al. Spatial localization of EEG electrodes. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007;37:97-102.
48. Steddin S, Botzel K. A new device for scalp electrode localization with unrestrained head. Journal of Neurology 1995;242:65.
49. Russell GS, Jeffrey Eriksen K, Poolman P, Luu P, Tucker DM. Geodesic photogrammetry for localizing sensor positions in dense-array EEG. Clinical Neurophysiology 2005;116:1130-1140.
50. Brinkmann BH, O'Brien TJ, Dresner MA et al. Scalp-recorded EEG localization in MRI volume data. Brain Topography 1998; 10:245-253.
51. Lagerlund TD, Sharbrough FW, Jack CR, Jr. et al. Determination of 10-20 system electrode locations using magnetic resonance image scanning with markers. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1993;86:7-14.
52. Yoo SS, Guttmann CR, Ives JR et al. 3D localization of surface 10-20 EEG electrodes on high resolution anatomical MR images. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1997;102:335-339.
53. Rodin E, Rodin M, Boyer R, Thompson J. Displaying electroencephalographic dipole sources on magnetic resonance images. Journal of Neuroimaging 1997;7:106-110.
54. Scherg M, Ille N, Bornfleth H, Berg P. Advanced tools for digital EEG review: virtual source montages, whole-head mapping, correlation, and phase analysis. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 2002;19: 91-112.
55. Fletcher EM, Kussmaul CL, Mangun GR. Estimation of interpolation errors in scalp topographic mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1996;98:422-434.
56. Junghofer M, Elbert T, Tucker DM, Rockstroh B. Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. Psychophysiology 2000;37:523-532.
57. Lins OG, Picton TW, Berg P, Scherg M. Ocular artifacts in EEG and event-related potentials. I: Scalp topography. Brain Topography 1993;6:51-63.
58. Berg P, Scherg M. Dipole models of eye movements and blinks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1991;79:36-44.
59. Hyvarinen A, Oja E. Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Networks 2000;13: 411-430.
60. Jung TP, Makeig S, Humphries C et al. Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 2000;37:163-178.
61. Jung TP, Makeig S, WesterfieldMet al. Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clinical Neurophysiology 2000;111:1745-1758.
62. Delorme A, Sejnowski T, Makeig S. Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis. Neuroimage 2007;34:1443-1449.
63. Mantini D, Perrucci MG, Cugini S et al. Complete artifact removal for EEG recorded during continuous fMRI using independent component analysis. Neuroimage 2007;34:598-607.
64. Grouiller F, Vercueil L, Krainik A et al. A comparative study of different artefact removal algorithms for EEG signals acquired during functional MRI. Neuroimage 2007;38:124-137.