Variation in working memory capacity and intrusions: Differences in generation or editing?

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 990-1000

  Unsworth, Nash ^a   Brewer, Gene A ^a  

^a University of Georgia   (United States)

Author keywords

False memory; Free recall; Intrusions; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FALSE MEMORY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 77955453326     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440903175086     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97-123.
2. Bousfield, W A., & Rosner, S. R. (1970). Free vs. uninhibited recall. Psychonomic Science, 20, 75-76.
3. Chiappe, P., Hasher, L., & Siegel, L. S. (2000). Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability. Memory and Cognition, 28, 8-17.
4. Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 769-786.
5. Craik, F. I. M. (1968). Types of error in free recall. Psychonomic Science, 10, 353-354.
6. De Beni, R., & Palladino, P. (2004). Decline in working memory updating through ageing: Intrusion error analyses. Memory, 12, 75-89.
7. Hasher, L., Lustig, C., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 227-249). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
9. Kahana, M. J., Dolan, E. D., Sauder, C. L., & Wingfield, A. (2005). Intrusions in episodic recall: Age differences in editing of overt responses. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 60B, 92-97.
10. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol.14 (pp. 207-262). New York: Academic Press.
11. Roediger, H. L., & Payne, D. G. (1985). Recall criterion does not affect recall level or hypermnesia: A puzzle for generate/recognize theories. Memory and Cognition, 13, 1-7.
12. Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 211-227.
13. Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 418-436.
14. Sirotin, Y. B., Kimball, D. R., & Kahana, M. J. (2005). Going beyond a single list: Modeling the effects of prior experience on episodic free recall. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 787-805.
15. Unsworth, N. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: Examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1020-1034.
16. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2006). A temporal-contextual retrieval account of complex span: An analysis of errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 346-362.
17. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104-132.
18. Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498-505.
19. Unsworth, N., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W (2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 1302-1321.
20. Watson, J. M., Bunting, M. F., Poole, B. J., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 76-85.