Recreational noise exposure decreases olivocochlear efferent reflex strength in young adults

Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 426-432

  Peng, Jian Hua ^a   Wang, Jing Bo ^a   Chen, Jian Hu ^a  

^a THE FIRST AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF WENZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Acoustic reflex; Distortion product otoacoustic emission; Olivocochlear efferent suppression; Recreational noise

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC REFLEX; ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NOISE; NOISE INJURY; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; RECREATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FOLLOW UP; OLIVARY NUCLEUS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; COCHLEA; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; OLIVARY NUCLEUS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; RECREATION; REFERENCE VALUES; REFLEX, ACOUSTIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955451621     PISSN: 19160216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7070.2010.090220     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Guinan JJ. Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 2006;27:589-607.
2. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;64:1386-91.
3. Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Wen H, et al. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993;71:1-11.
4. Zhang F, Boettcher FA, Sun XM. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams. Int J Audiol 2007;46:187-95.
5. Moulin A, Collet L, Duclaux R. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans. Hear Res 1993;65:193-210.
6. Souter M. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise. Hear Res 1995;91:167-77.
7. Kumar A, Barman A. Effect of efferent-induced changes on acoustical reflex. Int J Audiol 2002;41:144-7.
8. Mets JT. Hearing impairment caused by occupational noise. S Afr Med J 1971;45:935-45.
9. Peng JH, Tao ZZ, Huang ZW. Risk of damage to hearing from personal listening devices in young adults. J Otolaryngol 2007;36:181-5.
10. Biassoni EC, Serra MR, Richtert U, et al. Recreational noise exposure and its effects on the hearing of adolescents. Part II: development of hearing disorders. Int J Audiol 2005;44:74-85.
11. Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Kotylo P. Occupational exposure to noise decreases otoacoustic emission efferent suppression. Int J Audiol 2002;41:113-9.
12. Burns W, Robinson DW. An investigation of the effects of occupational noise on hearing. Ciba Found Symp 1970:177-92.
13. Mantysalo S, Vuori J. Effects of impulse noise and continuous steady state noise on hearing. Br J Ind Med 1984;41:122-32.
14. Perrot X, Micheyl C, Khalfa S, et al. Stronger bilateral efferent influences on cochlear biomechanical activity in musicians than in non-musicians. Neurosci Lett 1999;262:167-70.
15. Atcherson SR, Martin MJ, Lintvedt R. Contralateral noise has possible asymmetric frequency-sensitive effect on the 2F1-F2 otoacoustic emission in humans. Neurosci Lett 2008;438:107-10.
16. Lisowska G, Smurzynski J, Morawski K, et al. Influence of contralateral stimulation by two-tone complexes, narrow-band and broad-band noise signals on the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission levels in humans. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2002;122:613-9.
17. Chery-Croze S, Moulin A, Collet L. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2f1-f2 in humans: evidence of a frequency specificity. Hear Res 1993;68:53-8.
18. Sun XM. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression. J Acoust Soc Am 2008;123:4310-20.