Influence of contralateral stimulation by two-tone complexes, narrow-band and broad-band noise signals on the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission levels in humans

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 122, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 613-619

  Lisowska, G ^a   Smurzynski, J ^b   Morawski, K ^a   Namyslowski, G ^a   Probst, R ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Contralateral stimulation; Efferent system; Olivocochlear bundle; Otoacoustic emission; Suppression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEAR NERVE; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR SYSTEM; NERVE POTENTIAL; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SUPERIOR OLIVARY NUCLEUS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; COCHLEAR NERVE; EFFERENT PATHWAYS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEURAL INHIBITION; OLIVARY NUCLEUS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 0036398304     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/000164802320396286     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Warr WB, Guinan JJ Jr. Efferent innervation of the organ of Corti: two separate systems. Brain Res 1979; 173: 152-5.
2. Guinan JJ Jr, Warr WB, Norris BE. Differential olivocochlear projections from lateral versus medial zones of the superior olivary complex. J Comp Neurol 1983; 221: 358-70.
3. Galambos R. Suppression of auditory activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to the cochlea. J Neurophysiol 1956; 19: 424-37.
4. Wiederhold ML, Kiang NY. Effects of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 48: 950-65.
5. Buno W. Auditory nerve fiber activity influenced by contralateral ear sound stimulation. Exp Neurol 1978; 59: 62-74.
6. Liberman MC. Rapid assessment of sound evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Hear Res 1989; 38: 47-56.
7. Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 1986; 22: 95-104.
8. Mott JB, Norton SJ, Neely ST, Warr WB. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear. Hear Res 1989; 38: 229-42.
9. Harrison WA, Burns EM. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2649-58.
10. Collet L, Kemp DT, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 1990; 43: 251-61.
11. Collet L, Veuillet E, Moulin A, et al. Contralateral auditory stimulation and otoacoustic emissions: a review of basic data in humans. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 213-8.
12. Moulin A, Collet L, Morgan A. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE? Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1992; 112: 210-4.
13. Moulin A, Collet L, Duclaux R. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans. Hear Res 1993; 65: 193-210.
14. 2 in humans: evidence of a frequency specificity. Hear Res 1993; 68: 53-8.
15. Williams DM, Brown AM. The effect of contralateral broad-band noise on acoustic distortion products from the human ear. Hear Res 1997; 104: 127-46.
16. Giraud AL, Wable J, Hays A, Collet L, Chėry-Croze S. Influence of contralateral noise on distortion product latency in humans: is the medial olivocochlear efferent system involved? J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 2219-27.
17. Nieschalk M, Beneking R, Stoll W. Die Pegelzunahme von Distorsionsproduktemissionen des Menschen durch kontralaterale Beschallung niedriger Intensität. HNO 1997; 45: 378-84.
18. Maison S, Micheyl C, Andéol G, Gallégo S, Collet L. Activation of medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans: influence of stimulus bandwidth. Hear Res 2000; 140: 111-25.
19. Brown MC. Morphology and response properties of single olivocochlear fibers in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1989; 40: 93-109.
20. Robertson D, Gummer M. Physiological and morphological characterization of efferent neurones in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 1985; 20: 63-77.
21. Roede J, Harris FP, Probst R, Xu L. Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. Audiology 1993; 32: 273-81.
22. Siegel JH, Kim DO. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity. Hear Res 1982; 6: 171-82.
23. Maison SF, Liberman MC. Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 4701-7.
24. Kim DO, Dorn PA, Neely ST, Gorga MP. Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2001; 2: 31-40.
25. 2 distortion product otoacoustic emission. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99: 3572-84.