Prognostic impact of intraoperative microscopic cut-through on frozen section in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 370-377

  Guillemaud, Jennifer P ^a   Patel, Rajan S ^a   Goldstein, David P ^b   Higgins, Kevin M ^a   Enepekides, Danny J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Disease specific survival; Frozen section; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Overall survival; Pathology; Prognosis; Recurrence; Tumour margin

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER CONTROL; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FROZEN SECTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LOG RANK TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MICROSCOPY; MOUTH CARCINOMA; MOUTH CAVITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NECK DISSECTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL RATE; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; FOLLOW UP; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH NEOPLASMS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING; PROCEDURES; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; MOUTH NEOPLASMS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77955444084     PISSN: 19160216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7070.2010.090084     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Byers RM, Bland KI, Borlase B, Luna M. The prognostic and therapeutic value of frozen section determinations in the surgical treatment of squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg 1978;136:525-8.
2. Rogers SN, Brown JS, Woolgar JA, et al. Survival following primary surgery for oral cancer. Oral Oncol 2009;45:201-11.
3. Sutton DN, Brown JS, Rogers SN, et al. The prognostic implications of the surgical margin in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;32:30-4.
4. Loree TR, Strong EW. Significance of positive margins in oral cavity squamous carcinoma. Am J Surg 1990;160:410-4.
5. Spiro RH, Guillamondegui O Jr, Paulino AF, Huvos AG. Pattern of invasion and margin assessment in patients with oral tongue cancer. Head Neck 1999;21:408-13.
6. Scholl P, Byers RM, Batsakis JG, et al. Microscopic cut-through of cancer in the surgical treatment of squamous carcinoma of the tongue. Prognostic and therapeutic implications. Am J Surg 1986; 152:354-60.
7. Batsakis JG. Surgical excision margins: a pathologist's perspective. Adv Anat Pathol 1999;6:140-8.
8. Brandwein-Gensler M, Teixeira MS, Lewis CM, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:167-78.
9. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al, editors. American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
10. Baek CH, Son YI, Jeong HS, et al. Intraoral sonography-assisted resection of T1-2 tongue cancer for adequate deep resection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;139:805-10.