Psychometric properties of the Norwegian MacNew Heart Disease health-related quality of life inventory

European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 146-152

  Hiller, Aud ^a   Helvik, Anne Sofie ^a,b,c   Kaasa, Stein ^a,c   Slørdahl, Stig A ^a,c  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b INNLANDET HOSPITAL TRUST   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Angina pectoris; Health related quality of life; Heart failure; Myocardial infarction; Psychometric properties

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EMOTION; EVALUATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORWEGIAN MACNEW HEART DISEASE HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE INVENTORY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SHORT FORM 36; SOCIAL ASPECT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDATION STUDY; VALIDITY;

EID: 77955426632     PISSN: 14745151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.01.002     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Hillers T., Guyatt G., Oldridge N. Quality of life after myocardial infarction. J Clin Epidemiol 1994, 47:1278-1296.
2. Spertus J., Winder J., Dewhurst T., et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995, 25:333-341.
3. Rector T., Cohn J. Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire: reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan. Am. Heart J. 1992, 124:1017-2.
4. Green C., Porter C., Bresnahan D., et al. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 35:1245-1255.
5. Valenti L., Lim L., Heller R.F., et al. An improved questionnaire for assessing quality of life after myocardial infarction. Qual. Life Res. 1996, 5:151-156.
6. Dixon T., Lim L.-Y., Oldridge N. The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life instrument: reference data for users. Qual. Life Res. 2002, 11:173-183.
7. Dixon T., Lim L.-Y., Heller R. Quality of life: an index for identifying high-risk cardiac patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2001, 54:952-960.
8. Höfer S., Anelli-Monti M., Berger T., et al. Psychometric properties of an established heart disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for pacemaker patients. Qual. Life Res. 2005, 14:1937-1942.
9. 2008. http://www.proqolid.org/.
10. Brotons C.C., Ribera S.A., Permanyer M.G., et al. Adaptation of the MacNew QLMI quality of life questionnaire after myocardial infarction to be used in the Spanish population. Med Clin (Barc) 2000 Dec 9, 115:768-771.
11. Mohsen A., Javadi H., Melville M. Adaption of the MacNew quality of life questionnaire after myocardial infarction in an Iranian population. Health Qual Life Outcomes Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003, 1:1-23.
12. De Gucht V., Van Elderen T., Van der Kamp L., et al. Quality of life after myocardial infarction: translation and validation of the MacNew Questionnaire for a Dutch population. Qual. Life Res. 2004, 13:1483-1488.
13. Leal A., Pavia C., Höfer S., et al. Evaluative and discriminative properties of the Portuguese MacNew Heart Disease Health-related Quality-of-Life questionnaire. Qual. Life Res. 2005, 14:2335-2341.
14. Höfer S., Benzer W., Schussler G., et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease treated for angina: validity and reliability of German translation of two specific questionnaires. Qual. Life Res. 2003, 12:199-212.
15. Yu D.S.F., Thompson D.R., Yu C.M., et al. Validation of the Chinese version of the MacNew Heart Disease Health-related Quality of Life questionnaire. J Eval Clin Pract 2008, 14:326-335.
16. Daskapan A., Höfer S., Oldridge N., et al. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the MacNew Heart disease questionnaire in patients with angina. J Eval Clin Pract 2008, 14:209-213.
17. Aaronson N., Alonso J., Burnam A., et al. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual. Life Res. 2002, 11:193-205.
18. Rognmo Ø., Hetland E., Helgerud J., et al. High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2004, 11:216-222.
19. Oldridge N., Saner H., HM M., et al. The Euro CArdio-QoL Project. An international study to develop a core disease health-related quality of life questionnaire, the HeartQoL. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2005, 12:87-94.
20. Declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J 1964;ii: 177.
21. Fayers P.M., Machin D. Quality of Life, assessment, analysis and interpretation 2001, Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England.
22. Höfer S., Lim L., Guyatt G., et al. The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life instrument: a summary. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004, 2:3.
23. Höfer S., Schmid J.-P., Frick M., et al. Psychometric properties of the MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life instrument in patients with heart failure. J Eval Clin Pract 2008.
24. Murberg T., Bru E. Social relationship and mortality in patients with congestive heart failure. J Psychosom Res 2001, 51:521-527.