Analysis of the biomechanical properties of the mandible after unilateral distraction osteogenesis

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 126, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 533-542

  Schwarz, Daniel A ^a   Arman, Krikor G ^a   Kakwan, Mehreen S ^a   Jamali, Ameen M ^a   Buchman, Steven R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE MODEL; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; FRACTURE HEALING; MALE; MANDIBLE FRACTURE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; RANDOMIZATION; RAT; REFERENCE VALUE; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FRACTURE HEALING; MALE; MANDIBULAR FRACTURES; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; PROBABILITY; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REFERENCE VALUES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 77955424876     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de2240     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aronson J, Johnson E, Harp JH. Local bone transportation for treatment of intercalary defects by the Ilizarov technique: Biomechanical and clinical considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;243:71-79.
2. Paley D, Catagni MA, Argnani F, Villa A, Benedetti GB, Cattaneo R. Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;241:146-165. (Pubitemid 19101252)
3. White SH, Kenwright J. The timing of distraction of an osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg (Br.) 1990;72:356-361.
4. White SH, Kenwright J. The importance of delay in distraction of osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22:569-579.
5. Paley D, Catagni M, Argnani F, Prevot J, Bell D, Armstrong P. Treatment of congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia using the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;280:81-93.
6. Codivilla A. On the means of lengthening, in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. 1904. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:4-9.
7. Kontaxis A, Abu-Serriah M, Ayoub AF, Barbenel JC. Mechanical testing of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein- 7 regenerated bone in sheep mandibles. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2004;218:381-388.
8. Perrott DH, Rahn B, Wahl D, et al. Development of a mechanical testing system for a mandibular distraction wound. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:523-527.
9. Farhadieh RD, Gianoutsos MP, Dickinson R, Walsh WR. Effect of distraction rate on biomechanical, mineralization, and histologic properties of an ovine mandible model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:889-895.
10. Kunz C, Adolphs N, Buscher P, Hammer B, Rahn B. Mineralization and mechanical properties of the canine mandible distraction wound following acute molding. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:822-827.
11. Yu JC, Fearon J, Havlik RJ, Buchman SR, Polley JW. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1E-20E.
12. Diner PA, Tomat C, Soupre V, Martinez H, Vazquez MP. Intraoral mandibular distraction: Indications, technique and long-term results. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1999;28:634-641.
13. Hollier LH, Kim JH, Grayson B, McCarthy JG. Mandibular growth after distraction in patients under 48 months of age. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1361-1370.
14. Gosain AK. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:278-280.
15. Monasterio FO, Drucker M, Molina F, Ysunza A. Distraction osteogenesis in Pierre Robin sequence and related respiratory problems in children. J Craniofac Surg. 2002;13:79-83; discussion 84.
16. Carls FR, Sailer HF. Seven years clinical experience with mandibular distraction in children. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;26:197-208.
17. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:1-8; discussion 9-10.
18. Mofid MM, Manson PN, Robertson BC, Tufaro AP, Elias JJ, Vander Kolk CA. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: A review of 3278 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1103-1114; discussion 1115-1117.
19. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1989;239: 263-285.
20. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;238: 249-281.
21. Buchman SR, Ignelzi MA Jr, Radu C, et al. Unique rodent model of distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49:511-519.
22. Institute of Laboratory Animals Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 7th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
23. Figueroa AA, Polley JW. Clinical controversies in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Part two. External versus internal distraction osteogenesis for the management of severe maxillary hypoplasia: External distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2598-2604.
24. Molina FM, Morales C, Taylor JA. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a patient with Melnick-Needles syndrome. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19:277-279.
25. Rhee ST, Buchman SR. Pediatric mandibular distraction osteogenesis: The present and the future. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:803-808.
26. Ilizarov GA. Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:8-26.
27. Turner CH. Measurement of the Young's modulus bending tests can be highly inaccurate. J Orthop Res. 1993;11:462-463.
28. Turner CH, Burr DB. Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: A tutorial. Bone 1993;14:595-608.
29. Cheung LK, Zheng LW. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction at different rates in an experimental model. J Craniofac Surg. 2006; 17:100-108; discussion 109-110.
30. Elovic RP, Hipp JA, Hayes WC. A method for measuring the structural properties of the rat mandible. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39:1029-1033.
31. Aronson J, Shen XC, Skinner RA, Hogue WR, Badger TM, Lumpkin CK Jr. Rat model of distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Res. 1997;15:221-226.
32. Richards M, Goulet JA, Schaffler MB, Goldstein SA. Temporal and spatial characterization of regenerate bone in the lengthened rabbit tibia. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:1978-1986.
33. Richards M, Goulet JA, Weiss JA, Waanders NA, Schaffler MB, Goldstein SA. Bone regeneration and fracture healing: Experience with distraction osteogenesis model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355(Suppl):S191-S204.
34. Richards M, Waanders NA, Weiss JA, et al. Reduced gap strains induce changes in bone regeneration during distraction. J Biomech Eng. 1999;121:348-355.
35. Waanders NA, Richards M, Steen H, Kuhn JL, Goldstein SA, Goulet JA. Evaluation of the mechanical environment during distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;349:225-234.
36. Huang CS, Ko WC, Lin WY, Liou EJ, Hong KF, Chen YR. Mandibular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis in children: A one-year follow-up study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999; 36:269-274.
37. Huisinga-Fischer CE, Vaandrager JM, Prahl-Andersen B. Longitudinal results of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:924-933.
38. Ko EW, Hung KF, Huang CS, Chen PK. Correction of facial asymmetry with multiplanar mandible distraction: A oneyear follow-up study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41:5-12.
39. Kusnoto B, Figueroa AA, Polley JW. A longitudinal threedimensional evaluation of the growth pattern in hemifacial microsomia treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A preliminary report. J Craniofac Surg. 1999;10:480-486.
40. Rachmiel A, Manor R, Peled M, Laufer D. Intraoral distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:728-733.
41. Shetye PR, Grayson BH, Mackool RJ, McCarthy JG. Longterm stability and growth following unilateral mandibular distraction in growing children with craniofacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:985-995.
42. Chiapasco M, Lang NP, Bosshardt DD. Quality and quantity of bone following alveolar distraction osteogenesis in the human mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:394-402.
43. Higuera S, Cole P, Stephenson JB, Hollier L. Distraction rate and latency: Factors in the outcome of paediatric maxillary distraction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:1564-1567.
44. Kim UK, Chung IK, Lee KH, Swift JQ, Seong WJ, Ko CC. Bone regeneration in mandibular distraction osteogenesis combined with compression stimulation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1498-1505.
45. Goldstein SA. The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: Dependence on anatomic location and function. J Biomech. 1987;20:1055-1061.
46. Goldstein SA, Goulet R, McCubbrey D. Measurement and significance of three-dimensional architecture to the mechanical integrity of trabecular bone. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993; 53(Suppl 1):S127-S132; discussion S132-S133.
47. Chehade MJ, Pohl AP, Pearcy MJ, Nawana N. Clinical implications of stiffness and strength changes in fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br.) 1997;79:9-12.
48. Shefelbine SJ, Simon U, Claes L, et al. Prediction of fracture callus mechanical properties using micro-CT images and voxel-based finite element analysis. Bone 2005;36:480-488.