Distraction rate and latency: factors in the outcome of paediatric maxillary distraction

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

Volumn 62, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1564-1567

  Higuera, Stephen ^a   Cole, Patrick ^a   Stephenson, J B ^a   Hollier, Larry ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Distraction; Latency; Maxillary distraction; Rate

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CELLULITIS; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DEVICE REMOVAL; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; FACE MALFORMATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALING; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MAXILLARY DISTRACTION; MIDFACIAL DEFICIENCY; PARENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SATISFACTION; SCHOOL CHILD; SELLA TURCICA; VASCULARIZATION; ACROCEPHALOSYNDACTYLY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CROUZON SYNDROME; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACROCEPHALOSYNDACTYLIA; ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CRANIOFACIAL DYSOSTOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAXILLA; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 73349138908     PISSN: 17486815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.045     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Codivilla A. On the means of lengthening in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg (1905) 2-353
2. Ilizarov G.A. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissue: part I. The influence of stability of fixation soft tissue preservation. Clin Orthop (1989) 238-249
3. Ilizarov G.A. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissue: part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop (1989) 239-263
4. McCarthy J.G., Schrieber J., Karp N., et al. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89 (1992)
5. Polley J.W., and Figueroa A.A. Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device. J Craniofac Surg (1997) 8-181
6. Krimmel M., Cornelius C.P., Roser M., et al. External distraction of the maxilla in patients with craniofacial dysplasia. J Craniofac Surg 12 (2001) 458
7. Swennen G., Dujardin T., Goris A., et al. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis: a new method with skeletal anchorage. J Craniofac Surg 11 (2000) 120
8. Nagase T., Nagase M., Hirose S., et al. Mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 and craniosynostotic syndromes in Japanese children. J Craniofac Surg 9 (1998) 162
9. Troulis M.J., Glowacki J., Perrott D.H., et al. Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58 (2000) 507
10. Mofid M.M., Manson P.N., Robertson B.C., et al. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: A review of 3278 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 108 (2001) 1103
11. Hollier L.H., Higuera S., Stal S., et al. Distraction rate and latency: factors in the outcome of pediatric mandibular distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 117 (2005)
12. Hollier LH, Kim J, Grayson BH, et al. Unpublished data. 1998.