Context sensitivity and invariance in perception of octave-ambiguous tones

Psychological Research

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 437-456

  Repp, Bruno H ^a   Thompson, Jacqueline M ^b  

^a HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MUSIC; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MUSIC; PITCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 77955419363     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0264-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13-21.
2. Braun, J., & Pastukhov, A. (2007). Further differences between positive and negative priming in the perception of ambiguous patterns. Journal of Vision, 7(9), 368 [abstract].
3. Cohen, M. A., Grossberg, S., & Wyse, L. L. (1995). A spectral network model of pitch perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 862-879.
4. Dawe, L. A., Platt, J. R., & Welsh, E. (1998). Spectral-motion aftereffects and the tritone paradox among Canadian subjects. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 209-220.
5. Deutsch, D. (1986). A musical paradox. Music Perception, 3, 275-280.
6. Deutsch, D. (1987). The tritone paradox-effects of spectral variables. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 563-575.
7. Deutsch, D. (1991). The tritone paradox: An influence of language on music perception. Music Perception, 8, 335-347.
8. Deutsch, D. (1994). The tritone paradox: Some further geographical correlates. Music Perception, 12, 125-136.
9. Deutsch, D., Henthorn, T., & Dolson, M. (2004). Speech patterns heard early in life influence later perception of the tritone paradox. Music Perception, 21, 357-372.
10. Deutsch, D., Kuyper, W. L., & Fisher, Y. (1987). The tritone paradox: Its presence and form of distribution in a general population. Music Perception, 5, 79-92.
11. Fisher, N. I. (1993). Statistical analysis of circular data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Giangrande, J. (1998). The tritone paradox: Effects of pitch class and position of the spectral envelope. Music Perception, 15, 253-264.
13. Giangrande, J., Tuller, B., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2002). Perceptual dynamics of circular pitch. Music Perception, 20, 241-262.
14. Houtsma, A. J. M., & Fleuren, J. F. M. (1991). Analytic and synthetic pitch of two-tone complexes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 1674-1676.
15. Kanai, R., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2005). Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: Motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization. Vision Research, 45, 3109-3116.
16. Kraus, N., & Banai, K. (2007). Auditory-processing malleability: Focus on language and music. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 105-110.
17. Krumhansl, C. L., & Iversen, P. (1992). Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 739-751.
18. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 254-264.
19. Luo, F., Wang, Q., Kashani, A., & Yan, J. (2008). Corticofugal modulation of initial sound processing in the brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 11615-11621.
20. Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. G. (2005). Mechanisms selectively engaged in rivalry: normal vision habituates, rivalrous vision primes. Vision Research, 45, 707-714.
21. Pitt, M. A. (1994). Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 976-986.
22. Preisler, A. (1993). The influence of spectral composition of complex tones and of musical experience on the perceptibility of virtual pitch. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 589-603.
23. Pressnitzer, D., & Hupé, J. M. (2006). Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization. Current Biology, 16, 1351-1357.
24. Ragozzine, F. (2001). The tritone paradox and perception of single octave-related complexes. Music Perception, 19, 155-168.
25. Ragozzine, F., & Deutsch, D. (1994). A regional difference in perception of the tritone paradox within the United States. Music Perception, 12, 213-226.
26. Repp, B. H. (1994). The tritone paradox and the pitch range of the speaking voice: A dubious connection. Music Perception, 12, 227-255.
27. Repp, B. H. (1997). Spectral envelope and context effects in the tritone paradox. Perception, 26, 645-665.
28. Schouten, J., Ritsma, R., & Cardozo, B. (1962). Pitch of the residue. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 1418-1424.
29. Seither-Preisler, A., Johnson, L., Krumbholz, K., Nobbe, A., Patterson, R., Seither, S., et al. (2007). Tone sequences with conflicting fundamental pitch and timbre changes are heard differently by musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 743-751.
30. Shepard, R. (1964). Circularity in judgments of relative pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36, 2346-2353.
31. Shepard, R. N. (1983). Demonstrations of circular components of pitch. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 31, 641-649.
32. Sterzer, P., Kleinschmidt, A., & Rees, G. (2009). The neural bases of multistable perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13, 310-318.
33. Sterzer, P., & Rees, G. (2008). A neural basis for percept stabilization in binocular rivalry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 389-399.
34. Terhardt, E. (1991). Music perception and sensory information acquisition: Relationships and low-level analogies. Music Perception, 8, 217-240.
35. Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., Schermbach, R., & Parncutt, R. (1986). Tonhöhenmehrdeutigkeit, Tonverwandtschaft und Identifikation von Sukzessivintervallen [Pitch ambiguity, pitch relatedness, and identification of successive intervals]. Acustica, 61, 57-66.
36. Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., & Seewann, M. (1982a). Pitch of complex signals according to virtual-pitch theory: Tests, examples, and predictions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 671-678.
37. Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., & Seewann, M. (1982b). Algorithm for extraction of pitch and pitch salience from complex tonal signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 679-688.