The tritone paradox: Effects of pitch class and position of the spectral envelope

Music Perception

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 253-264

  Giangrande, Janice ^a  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011051018     PISSN: 07307829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/40285767     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Deutsch, D. (1986). A musical paradox. Music Perception, 3, 275-280.
2. Deutsch, D. (1987). The tritone paradox: Effects of spectral variables. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 563-575.
3. Deutsch, D. (1991). The tritone paradox: An influence of language on music perception. Music Perception, 8, 335-347.
4. Deutsch, D. (1994a). The tritone paradox: Some further geographical correlates. Music Perception, 12, 125-136.
5. Deutsch, D. (1994b). The tritone paradox and the pitch range of the speaking voice: Reply to Repp. Music Perception, 12, 257-263.
6. Deutsch, D., Kuyper, W. L., & Fisher, Y. (1987). The tritone paradox: Its presence and form of distribution in a general population. Music Perception, 5, 79-92.
7. Deutsch, D., North, T., & Ray, L. (1990). The tritone paradox: Correlate with the listener's vocal range for speech. Music Perception, 7, 371-384.
8. Giangrande, J. (1993). A dynamical approach to directional pitch change. Unpublished master's thesis, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton.
9. Raggozine, F., & Deutsch, D. (1994). A regional difference in perception of the tritone paradox within the United States. Music Perception, 12, 213-225.
10. Repp, B. H. (1994). The tritone paradox and the pitch range of the speaking voice: A dubious connection. Music Perception, 12, 227-255.