Rubber-toughening of dimethacrylate dental composite resin

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 447-454

  Lee, Valerie A ^a   Cardenas, H Lee ^a   Rawls, H Ralph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental craniofacial material; Failure analysis; Fracture toughness; Microspheres; Polymer

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATES; CAVITATION; COMPOSITE MICROMECHANICS; DENTAL COMPOSITES; DICHLOROMETHANE; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FILLERS; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; MICROSPHERES; POLYBUTADIENES; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RESINS; RESTORATION; RUBBER; SILICA;

ABSORPTION OF ENERGY; COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS; CROSSHEAD SPEED; DENTAL COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; DENTAL/CRANIOFACIAL MATERIAL; DIMETHACRYLATES; FLEXURAL MODULUS; FLEXURAL STRENGTH; RESIN SYSTEMS; RUBBER-TOUGHENED; SERVICE LIFETIME; SHEAR DAMAGE; SHEAR YIELDING; SURROUNDING MATRIX; THREE-POINT BEND TEST;

FRACTURE;

1,3 BUTADIENE; FILLER; METHACRYLIC ACID; RESIN; RUBBER; SILICON DIOXIDE; 1,3 BUTADIENE DERIVATIVE; ELASTOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYBUTADIENE;

ARTICLE; ENERGY ABSORPTION; MATERIALS TESTING; SHEAR STRESS; TOOTH FILLING; CHEMISTRY; HARDNESS;

BUTADIENES; ELASTOMERS; HARDNESS; METHACRYLATES; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; RUBBER; SILICON DIOXIDE;

EID: 77955392791     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31674     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anusavice K. J., Ed.. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials, 11 ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Science;2003.
2. Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, Buerkle V, Garcia-Godoy F, Manhart J. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent 2005;18:198-211.
3. Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F, Hickel R. Direct posterior restorations: Clinical results and new developments. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46:303-339.
4. Cook WD, Beech DR, Tyas MJ. Structure and properties of methacrylate based dental restorative materials. Biomaterials 1985;6: 362-368.
5. Kinloch AJ, Young RJ. Fracture Behavior of Polymers, London: Applied Science; 1983.
6. Petersen RC. Discontinuous fiber-reinforced composites above critical length. J Dent Res 2005;84:365-370.
7. Xu HHK, Quinn JB, Smith OT, Giuseppetti AA, Eichmiller FC. Effects of different whiskers on the reinforcement of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2003;19:359-367.
8. Rodford RA. Further development and evaluation of high impact strength denture base materials. J Dent 1990;18:151-157.
9. Rodford RA, Braden M. Further observations on high impact strength denture-base materials. Biomaterials 1992;13:726-728.
10. Matsukawa S, Hayakawa T, Nemoto K. Development of high-toughness resin for dental applications. Dent Mater 1994;10: 343-346.
11. Kerby RE, Tiba A, Knobloch LA, Schricker SR, Tiba O. Fracture toughness of modified dental resin systems. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30:780-784.
12. Sue HJ, Garcia-Meitin EI, Orchard NA. Toughening of epoxies via craze-like damage. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 1993;31: 595-608.
13. Yee AF. Yield and deformation behaviour of some polycarbonate blends. J Mater Sci 1977;12:757-765.
14. Guild FJ, Young RJ. Predictive model for particulate filled composite materials. Part 2. Soft particles. J Mater Sci 1989;24: 2454-2460.p
15. Cheng C, Peouto N, Hiltner A, Baer E, Soskey PR, Mylonakis SG. Comparison of some butadiene-based impact modifiers for polycarbonate. J Appl Polym Sci 1994;53:513-525.
16. Kinloch AJ, Guild FJ. Toughened plastics II: Novel approaches in science and engineering. In: Riew CK, Kinloch AJ, editors. Vol. 252: American Chemical Society, Washington, DC; 1996.
17. Plummer CJG, Beguelin P, Kausch HH. On the influence of particle morphology on microdeformation in rubber modified poly(-methyl methacrylate). Polymer 1996;37:7-10.
18. Pearson RA, Yee AF. Influence of particle-size and particle-size distribution on toughening mechanisms in rubber-modified epoxies. J Mater Sci 1991;26:3828-3844.
19. Refractive index of Aerosil 300. 2009. Available at: http://www. evonik.us/region/north-america/en/Pages/default.aspx. Access date 21 October 2009.
20. Refractive indices of bis-GMA, bis-EMA, and TEGDMA. 2009; Available from: http://www.esstechinc.com/. Access date 3 December 2009.
21. Williams JG. Fracture Mechanics of Polymers, New York: Ellis Horwood Ltd; 1984.
22. Yee AF, Pearson RA. Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies. part 1: Mechanical studies. J Mater Sci 1986;21: 2462-2474.
23. Pearson RA, Yee AF. Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies - Part 2 Microscopy studies. J Mater Sci 1986;21: 2475-2488.
24. Yee AF, Pearson RA. Toughening of Plastics II, London: Plastics and Rubber Institute; 1985. p 2/1.
25. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ. The role of plastic void growth in the fracture of rubber-toughened epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci Lett 1992; 11:484-487.
26. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ. The sequence of initiation of the toughening micromechanisms in rubber-modified epoxy polymers. Polymer 1992;33:5338-5340.
27. Brady TE, Yeh GSY. Yielding behavior of glassy amorphous polymers. J Appl Phys 1971;42:4622-4630.
28. Brady TE, Yeh GSY. Similarity between craze morphology and shear-band morphology in polystyrene. J Mater Sci 1973;8: 1083-1094.
29. Chikhi N, Fellahi S, Bakar M. Modification of epoxy resin using reactive liquid (ATBN) rubber. Eur Polym J 2002;38: 251-264.
30. Lee VA, Rawls HR. Compliant phase reduces polymerization shrinkage in dental composite resin. J Appl Polym Sci 2005;97: 2306-2310.
31. Lee VA, Rawls HR. Compliant aggregates reduce polymerization contraction stress in dental composite resins. IADR Abstr 2007, Vol. 86, Special Issue A, Abstract 1588.