Response to saltuklaroglu, kalinowski, and stuart (2010)

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 912-916

  Pollard, Ryan ^a   Finan, Don ^b   Ramig, Peter R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Altered auditory feedback; Clinical trials; Prosthetic devices; Stuttering; Treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955385325     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0050)     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Armson, J., & Kiefte, M. (2008). The effect of SpeechEasy on stuttering frequency, speech rate, and speech naturalness. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 33, 120-134.
2. Armson, J., Kiefte, M., Mason, J., & De Croos, D. (2006). The effect of SpeechEasy on stuttering frequency in laboratory conditions. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31, 137-152.
3. Chakravarti, I. M., Laha, R. G., & Roy, J. (1967). Handbook of methods of applied statistics (Vol. 1). New York, NY:Wiley.
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Cook, M. J., & Smith, L. M. (2006, November). Outcomes for adult males using the SpeechEasy fluency device for one year. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Miami, FL.
6. Delorme, A. (2006). Statistical methods. Encyclopedia of Medical Devices and Instrumentation, 6, 240-264.
7. Guitar, B. (2005). Stuttering: An integrated approach to its nature and treatment (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
8. Kalinowski, J. (2003). Self-reported efficacy of an all in-theear- canal prosthetic device to inhibit stuttering during one hundred hours of university teaching: An autobiographical clinical commentary. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 107-111.
9. Kalinowski,J.,Guntupalli,V., Stuart,A.,&Saltuklaroglu,T. (2004). Self-reported efficacy of an ear-level prosthetic device that delivers altered auditory feedback for the management of stuttering. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 27, 167-170.
10. Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin et al. (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling (pp. 278-292). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Molt, L. (2006, November). SpeechEasy AAF device long-term clinical trial: Attitudinal/perceptual measures. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech- Language-Hearing Associating, Miami, FL.
12. O'Donnell, J. J., Armson, J., & Kiefte, M. (2008). The effectiveness of SpeechEasy during situations of daily living. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 33, 99-119.
13. Pollard, R., Ellis, J. B., Finan, D., & Ramig, P. R. (2009). Effects of the SpeechEasy on objective and perceived aspects of stuttering: A 6-month, Phase I clinical trial in naturalistic environments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 516-533.
14. Robey, R. R. (2004). A five-phase model for clinical-outcome research. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 401-411.
15. Runyan, C. M., Runyan, S. E., & Hibbard, S. (2006, November). The Speech Easy device: A three year study. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Miami, FL.
16. Saltuklaroglu, T., Kalinowski, J., & Stuart, A. (2010). Refutation of a therapeutic alternative? A reply to Pollard, Ellis, Finan, and Ramig (2009). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 908-911.
17. Snedecor, G.W.,&Cochran,W.G(1983). Statistical methods (8th ed.). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
18. Stuart, A., Kalinowski, J., Rastatter,M., Saltuklaroglu, T., &Dayalu, V. (2004). Investigations of the impact of altered auditory feedback in-the-ear devices on the speech of people who stutter: Initial fitting and 4-month follow-up. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39(1), 93-113.
19. Stuart, A., Kalinowski, J., Saltuklaroglu, T.,&Guntupalli, V. K. (2006). Investigations of the impact of altered auditory feedback in-the-ear devices on the speech of people who stutter: One-year follow-up. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 757-765.