A five-phase model for clinical-outcome research

Journal of Communication Disorders

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 401-411

  Robey, Randall R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical outcome research; Evidence based practice; Treatment effectiveness; Treatment efficacy

Indexed keywords

AUDIOLOGY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; COMMUNITY CARE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SERVICE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATHOLOGIST; PATIENT; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; SCIENCE; SPEECH DISORDER; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT PLANNING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 3042654718     PISSN: 00219924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Altman D.G., Schulz K.F., Moher D., Egger M., Davidoff F., Elbourne D., et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine. 134:2001;663-694
2. American Speech Language Hearing Association. (2003). Code of ethics (revised). ASHA Supplement, 23, 13-15.
3. Ammerman A.S., Lindquist C.H., Lohr K.N., Hersey J. The efficacy of behavioral interventions to modify dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake: A review of the evidence. Preventative Medicine. 35:2002;25-41
4. Bailar J.C., Mosteller F. Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals. Annals of Internal Medicine. 108:1988;266-273
5. Benjamin K. Outcomes research and the allied health professional. Journal of Allied Health. 24:1995;3-12
6. Bezeau S., Graves R. Statistical power and effect sizes of clinical neuropsychology research. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 23:2001;399-406
7. Boysen, A. E., & Wertz, R. T. (1996). Clinical costs in aphasia treatment: How much is a word worth? In M. L. Lemme (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology (Vol. 24). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
8. Brook R.H., Lohr K.N. Efficacy, effectiveness, variations, and quality: Boundary crossing research. Medical Care. 23:1985;710-722
9. Chalmers T.C., Smith H., Blackburn B., Silverman B., Schroeder B., Reitman D., et al. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Controlled Clinical Trials. 2:1981;31-49
10. Chambless D.L., Hollon S.D. Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 66:1998;7-188
11. Frattali, C. M. (1998a). Outcome assessment in speech-language pathology. In A. F. Johnson & B. H. Jacobson (Eds.), Medical speech-language pathology: A practitioners guide (pp. 685-709). New York: Theime.
12. Frattali, C. M. (1998b). Outcomes measurement: Definitions, dimensions, and perspectives. In C. M. Frattali (Ed.), Measuring outcomes in speech-language pathology (pp. 1-27). New York: Theime.
13. Frattali C., Worrall L.E. Evidence-based practice: Applying science to the art of clinical care. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology. 9:2001;ix-xiv
14. Greenwald P., Cullen J.W. The new emphasis in cancer control. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 74:1985;543-551
15. Grieve, A. P. (1990). Crossover versus parallel designs. In D. A. Berry (Ed.), Statistical methodology in the pharmaceutical sciences. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
16. Hoagwood K., Hibbs E., Brent D., Jensen P. Introduction to the special section: Efficacy and effectiveness in studies of child and adolescent psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 63:1995;683-687
17. Johnston M.V., Granger C.V. Outcomes research in medical rehabilitation: A primer and introduction to a series. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 73:1994;296-303
18. Kane, R. L. (1997). Approaching the outcomes question. In R. L. Kane (Ed.), Understanding health care outcome research. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
19. Kruse R.L., Alper B.S., Reust C., Stevermer J.J., Shannon S., Williams R.H. Intention-to-treat analysis: Who is in? Who is out? The Journal of Family Practice. 51:2002;969-971
20. Lohr K.N. Outcome measurement: Concepts and questions. Inquiry. 25:1988;37-50
21. Moher D., Schulz K.F., Altman D. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Journal of the American Medical Association. 285:2001;1987-1991
22. Office of Technology Assessment. (1978). Assessing the efficacy and safety of medical technologies (OTA-H-75). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
23. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). (2001). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24. Robey R.R. A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 41:1998;172-187
25. Robey R.R., Dalebout S.D. A tutorial on conducting meta-analyses of clinical outcome research. Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research. 41:1998;1227-1241
26. Robey R.R., Schultz M.C. A model for conducting clinical outcome research: An adaptation of the standard protocol for use in aphasiology. Aphasiology. 12:1998;787-810
27. Senn S.J. Cross-over trials, carry-over effects and the art of self-delusion. Statistics in Medicine. 7:1988;1099-1101
28. World Health Organization. (1997). International classification of impairments, activities, and participation (ICIDH-2). Geneva: Author.