From virtual teams to virtuality in teams

Human Relations

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1177-1197

  Dixon, Keith R ^a   Panteli, Niki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communication; Group communication; New technology; Teams; Virtuality; Work environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955375845     PISSN: 00187267     EISSN: 1741282X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018726709354784     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alge BL, Wiethoff C., and Klein HJ (2003) When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 91(1): 26-37.
2. Bell BS, Kozlowski SWJ (2002) A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management 27(1): 14-49.
3. Brown JS, Duguid P. (2000) The Social Life of Information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
4. Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science 15(5): 555-568.
5. Carlson JR, Zmud RW (1999) Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal 42(2): 153-170.
6. Chiasson M., Panteli N. (2008) Epilogue: An agenda for research and practice on the nature of virtuality. In: Panteli N, Chiasson M (eds) Exploring Virtuality Within and Beyond Organizations: Social, Global and Local Dimensions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 286-291.
7. Chudoba KM, Watson-Manheim MB (2008) Shared communication practices and mental models in the virtual work environment. In: Panteli N, Chiasson M (eds) Exploring Virtuality Within and Beyond Organizations: Social, Global and Local Dimensions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 55-72.
8. Chudoba KM, Wynn E., Lu M., and Watson-Manheim MB (2005) How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Journal 15(4): 279-306.
9. Cohen SG, Gibson CB (2003) In the beginning; Introduction and framework. In: Cohen SG, Gibson CB (eds) Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectivenees. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1-13.
10. Duarte DL, Snyder NT (2001) Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools and Techniques that Succeed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Fiol CM, O'Connor EJ (2005) Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organization Science 16(1): 19-32.
12. Gillham WEC (2000) Case Study Research Methods. London: Continuum International Group Ltd.
13. Griffith TL, Neale MA (2001) Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. In: Staw BM, Sutton RI (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 23. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 379-421.
14. Griffith TL, Sawyer JE, and Neale MA (2003) Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly 27(2): 265-287.
15. Gruenfeld DH, Mannix EA, Williams KY, and Neale MA (1996) Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 67(1): 1-15.
16. Gruenfeld DH, Martovana PVet al.(2000) What do groups learn from their wordliest members? Direct and indirect influence in dynamic teams. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 82(1): 45-59.
17. Harris M. (2008) Digital technology and governance transition: The case of the British Library. Human Relations 61(5): 741-758.
18. Hertel G., Geister S., and Konradt U. (2005) Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review 15(1): 69-95.
19. Hertel G., Konradt U., and Orlikowski B. (2004) Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology 13(1): 1-28.
20. Kirkman BL, Mathieu JE (2005) The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management 31(5): 700-718.
21. Levina N., Vaast E. (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly 29(2): 335-363.
22. Lipnack J., Stamps J. (1997) Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology. New York: Wiley.
23. Martins LL, Gilson LL, and Maynard MT (2004) Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management 30(6): 805-835.
24. McGrath JE (1991) Time, interaction, and performance (TIP). Small Group Research 22(2): 147-174.
25. Miles MB, Huberman MA (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26. Offerman LR, Spiros RK (2001) The science and practice of team development: Improving the link. Academy of Management Journal 44(2): 376-392.
27. Panteli N. (2004) Discursive articulations of presence in virtual organizing, Information & Organization 14(1): 59-81.
28. Panteli N., Chiasson M. (2008) Rethinking virtuality. In: Panteli N, Chiasson M (eds) Exploring Virtuality Within and Beyond Organizations: Social, Global and Local Dimensions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-17.
29. Powell A., Piccoli G., and Ives B. (2004) Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. Database 35(1): 6-36.
30. Shields R. (2006) Virtualities. Theory Culture & Society 23(2-3): 284-286.
31. Watson-Manheim MB, Chudoba KM, and Crowston K. (2002) Discontinuities and continuities: A new way to understand virtual work. Information Technology and People 15(3): 191-209.
32. Wenger E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Yin RK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: SAGE.
34. Yoo Y., Alavi M. (2001) Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation and group consensus. MIS Quarterly 25(3): 371-390.