Further evidence supporting the validity of both a multidimensional profile and an overall evaluation of teaching effectiveness

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 567-576

  Burdsal, Charles A ^a   Harrison, Paul D ^a  

^a WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955374024     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930701699049     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abrami, P.C. 1985. Dimensions of effective college instruction. Review of Higher Education 8, no. 3: 211-28.
2. Abrami, P.C. 1989. How should we use student ratings to evaluate teaching? Research in Higher Education 30, no. 2: 221-7.
3. Abrami, P.C and S. d'Apollonia. 1990. The dimensionality of ratings and their use in personnel decisions. In New directions for teaching and learning student ratings of instruction: issues for improving practice, no. 43, eds. M. Theall and J. Franklin, 97-111. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Abrami, P.C and S. d'Apollonia. 1991. Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness-generalizability of 'N = 1' research: Comment on Marsh (1991). Journal of Educational Psychology 83, no. 3: 411-5.
5. Abrami, P.C and S. d'Apollonia. 1999. Current concerns are past concerns. American Psychologist 54, no. 7: 519-20.
6. Braskamp, L.A., J.C. Ory, and D.M. Pieper. 1980. Congruency of student evaluative information collected by three methods. Journal of Educational Psychology 72, no. 2: 181-5.
7. Burdsal, C.A., and J.W. Bardo. 1986. Measuring students' perceptions of teaching: dimensions of evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement 46: 63-79.
8. D'Apollonia, S., and P.C. Abrami. 1997. Navigating student ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 52, no. 11: 1198-208.
9. Cashin, W.E., and R.G. Downey. 1992. Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology 84, no. 4: 563-72.
10. Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, no. 1: 37-46.
11. Cohen, P. A. 1981. Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: a meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research 51: 281-309.
12. Feldman, K.A. 1988. Effective college teaching from the students' and faculty view: matched or mismatched priorities? Research in Higher Education 28, no. 4: 291-344.
13. Franklin, U., and M. Theall. 1989. Rating the readers: knowledge, attitude, and practice of users of student ratings of instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
14. Frey, P.W. 1973. Student ratings of teaching: validity of several rating factors. Science 182: 83-5.
15. Frey, P.W. 1974. The ongoing debate: student evaluation of teaching. Change February: 47-49.
16. Frey, P.W. 1978. A two-dimensional analysis of student ratings of instruction. Research in Higher Education 9, no. 1:69-91.
17. Frey, P.W. and Flay, B.R. 1978. A cusp catastrophe model of evaluation person perception with an application to student ratings of instruction. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
18. Harrison, P.D., J.M. Ryan, and P.S. Moore. 1996. College students' self-insight and common implicit theories in ratings of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology 88, no. 4: 775-82.
19. Harrison, P.D., D.K. Douglas, and C.A. Burdsal. 2004. The relative merits of different types of overall evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Research in Higher Education 45, no. 3: 311-23.
20. Jackson, D.L., C.R. Teal, S.J. Raines, T.R. Nansel, R.C. Force, and C.A. Burdsal. 1999. The dimensions of students' perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement 59, no. 4: 580-96.
21. Marsh, H.W. 1982. SEEQ: A reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students' evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology 52, no. 1: 77-95.
22. Marsh, H.W. 1983. Multidimensional ratings of teaching effectiveness by students for different academic settings and their relationship to student/course/instructor characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 150-66.
23. Marsh, H.W. 1987. Students' evaluations of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research 11: 253-388.
24. Marsh, H.W. 1989. Responses to reviews of students' evaluations of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. Instructional Evaluation 10: 5-9.
25. Marsh, H.W. 1991a. Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: a test of higher-order structures. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 285-96.
26. Marsh, H.W. 1991b. A multidimensional perspective on students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: reply to Abrami and d'Apollonia (1991). Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 416-21.
27. Marsh, H.W. 1994. Weighting for the right criteria to validate student evaluations of teaching in the IDEA system. Journal of Educational Psychology 86, no. 4: 631-48.
28. Marsh, H. W., and Dunkin, M. J. 1992. Students' evaluations of university teaching: a multidimensional perspective. In Higher Education: handbook of Theory and Research, ed. John C. Smart, 143-233. New York: Agathon Press.
29. Marsh, H.W., and D. Hocevar. 1991. The multidimensionality of students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: The generality of factor structures across academic discipline, instructor level, and course level. Teaching and Teacher Education 7, no. 1: 9-18.
30. Marsh, H.W., and L.A. Roche. 1992. The use of student evaluations of university instructors in different settings. Australian Journal of Education 36: 278-300.
31. Marsh, H.W., and L.A. Roche. 1993. The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal 30, no. 1: 217-51.
32. Marsh, H.W., and L.A. Roche. 1997. Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: the critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology 52, no. 11: 1187-97.
33. Marsh, H.W., and L.A. Roche. 1999. Rely upon SET research. American Psychologist 54, no. 7: 517-8
34. Ory, J.C., and L.A. Braskamp. 1981. Faculty perceptions of the quality and usefulness of three types of evaluative information. Research in Higher Education 15, no. 3: 271-82.
35. Ryan, J.M., and P.D. Harrison. 1995. The relationship between individual instructional characteristics and the overall assessment of teaching effectiveness across different instructional contexts. Research in Higher Education 36, no. 5: 213-28.
36. Seldin, P. 1991. The teaching portfolio. Boston, MA: Anker Publishing.