Compliance without governance: The role of NGOs in environmental impact assessment processes in Bosnia-Herzegovina

Environmental Politics

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 599-616

  Fagan, Adam ^a   Sircar, Indraneel ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Environmental impact assessment; Environmental NGOs; EU assistance; EU candidate states; Western Balkans

Indexed keywords

CAPACITY BUILDING; COMPLIANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION;

BALKAN; BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA; TURKMENISTAN;

EID: 77955369751     PISSN: 09644016     EISSN: 17438934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2010.489714     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Almer, H.L. and Koontz, T.M., 2004. Public hearings for EIAs in post-communist Bulgaria: do they work? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 473-493.
2. Androulidakis, I. and Karakassis, I., 2006. Evaluation of the EIA system performance in Greece, using quality indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 242-256.
3. Carmin, J., 2008. Building capacity for environmental governance in central and eastern Europe: lessons for EU enlargement. Paper presented at the NEWGOV Cross- Cluster Workshop on "Civil Society, New Modes of Governance and Enlargement", Berlin, 3-5 July 2008.
4. Carmin J. and Vandeveer, S.D., 2004. Enlarging EU environments: central and eastern Europe from transition to accession. Environmental Politics, 13 (1), 3-24.
5. Carmin, J., et al., 2008. Environmental NGOs in central and eastern Europe: summary of survey findings. Report on the status of NGOs in central and eastern Europe [online]. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Available from: http://web.mit.edu/jcarmin/www/carmin/ CEE-ENGO%20Survey%20Report.pdf [Accessed 9 June 2010].
6. Branis, M. and Christopoulos, S., 2005. Mandated monitoring of post-project impacts in the Czech EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25, 227-238.
7. Del Furia, L. and Wallace-Jones, J., 2000. The effectiveness of provisions and quality of practices concerning public participation in EIA in Italy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 457-479.
8. Doberstein, B., 2004. EIA models and capacity building in Viet Nam: an analysis of development aid programs. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 284-318.
9. Fagan, A., 2001. Environmental capacity-building in the Czech Republic. Environment and Planning A, 33 (4), 589-606.
10. Fagan, A., 2005. Taking stock of civil society development in post-communist Europe: evidence from the Czech Republic. Democratization, 12 (4), 528-547.
11. Fagan, A., 2006. Neither 'north' nor 'south': The environment and civil society in post- conflict Bosnia-Herzegovina. Environmental Politics, 15 (5), 787-802.
12. Fischer, F., 2000. Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13. Glasson, J. and Bellanger, C., 2003. Divergent practice in a converging system? The case of EIA in France and the UK. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 605-624.
14. Goncalves, M.E., 2002. Implementation of EIA directives in Portugal: how changes in civic culture are challenging political and administrative practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22, 249-269.
15. Jay, S., et al., 2007. Environmental impact assessment: retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 287-300.
16. Jehlicka, P. and Tickle, A., 2004. The environmental implications of eastern enlargement of the European Union: the end of progressive EU Environmental Policy? Environmental Politics, 13 (1), 77-95.
17. Jordan, A., 2005. Environmental policy in the European Union: actors, institutions and processes. 2nd ed. London: Earthscan.
18. Mayntz, R., 2003. New challenges to governance theory. In: H.P. Bang, ed. Governance as social and political communication. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 27-40.
19. Palerm, J., 1999. Public participation in EIA in Hungary: analysis through three case studies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 19, 201-220.
20. Pierre, J., 2000. Debating governance: authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Regional Environmental Center, 2006. NGO Directory of South Eastern Europe: a directory and survey findings of west Balkan environmental civil society organisations [online]. 5th ed. Szentendre, Hungary. Available from: http://www.rec.org/REC/ Programs/NGO_support/PDF/ngo_directory_5th_ed.pdf [accessed 9 June 2010].
22. Rosenau, J., 1995. Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance, 1 (1), 13-43.
23. Rosenau, J. and Czempiel, E., eds., 1992. Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Smouts, M.C., 1998. The proper use of governance in international relations. International Social Science Journal, 50 (155), 81-89.
25. Wapner, P., 1996. Environmental activism and world civic politics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
26. Young, O.R., 2002. The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.