Mandated monitoring of post-project impacts in the Czech EIA

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 227-238

  Braniš, Martin ^a   Christopoulos, Stamatios ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Environmental impact assessment; Impact monitoring; Post auditing; Post development auditing; Post project monitoring

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FINANCE; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MONITORING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

CZECH REPUBLIC; DISTRICT OFFICES; FINANCIAL SUPPORT; POST PROJECT MONITORING;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

DATA ACQUISITION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; PROJECT ASSESSMENT;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; WORLD;

EID: 15244360352     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. E. Bellinger N. Lee C. George A. Paduret Environmental assessment in countries of transition 2000 CEU Press Budapest, Hungary
2. R. Bisset Post-development audits to investigate the accuracy of environmental impact predictions Z. Umweltpolit. 4 1984 463 484
3. R. Bisset, and P. Tomlinson Monitoring and auditing of impacts P. Wathern Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice 1988 Unwin Hyman London 117 128
4. M. Braniš A system of certified environmental impact assessment experts in the Czech Republic Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev. 14 2-3 1994 203 208
5. M. Braniš, and E. Kružíkova The Environmental Impact Assessment Act in the Czech Republic: origins, introduction and implementation issues Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev. 14 2-3 1994 195 201
6. M. Braniš, and I. Mádlová Analysis of Czech environmental impact statements submitted for approval between July 1992 and March 1996 Acta Univ. Carol., Environ. 14 1-2 2000 127 138
7. R. Buckley Auditing the precision and accuracy of environmental impact predictions in Australia Environ. Monit. Asses. 18 1991 1 23
8. R. Buckley How accurate are environmental impact predictions Ambio 20 3-4 1992 161 162
9. B. Dipper, C. Jones, and C. Wood Monitoring and post-auditing in environmental impact assessment: a review J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 41 6 1998 731 747
10. Lipský Z. Strategic environmental assessment in the Czech legislature: uncertainties when to use EIA procedure. In: Verheyen R, Nagels K, editors. Methodology, focalisation, evaluation and scope of environmental impact assessment, Fourth report: Strategic environmental assessment: Theory versus practice. Report No. 212 University of Antverp; 1996. p. 34-7.
11. J.R. Palerm, and W.R. Sheate Environmental impact assessment in Central and Eastern Europe: lessons from the Czech Republic and Romania Eur. Environ. Law Rev. 1996 15 22 [Jan]
12. Rambousková H. Czech Republic. Methodology, evaluation and scope of environmental impact assessment. 1993; First report, Evaluation of EIA process, NATO No. 197: 133-148.
13. Simons JHEJ, Baker, C, Schropp MHI, Jans LH, Kok FR, Grift RE. Man_made secondary channels along the river Rhine (The Netherloands); Results of post-projects monitoring 2001;17:473-91.
14. A. Stewart-Oaten, and J.R. Bence Temporal and spatial variation in environmental impact assessment Ecol. Monogr. 71 2 2001 305 339
15. L. Wilson A practical method for environmental impact assessment audits Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev. 18 1998 59 71
16. G. Wood Is what you see what you get? Post-development auditing of methods used for predicting the zone of visual influence Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev. 20 2000 537 556
17. Wood CM, Scott P. Monitoring and post auditing in environmental impact assessment. EIA Leaflet Series 19. Dec. 1998.
18. C. Wood, P. Dipper, and C. Jones Auditing the assessment of the environmental impacts of planning projects J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 43 1 2000 23 47