Mapping the strain distribution on the proximal femur with titanium and flexible-stemmed implants using digital image correlation

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 92, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1176-1181

  Tayton, E ^a,b   Evans, S ^a   O'Doherty, D ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b SALISBURY DISTRICT HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON FIBER; PLASTIC; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORTICAL BONE; FEMUR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; IMPLANT; LOADING TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP;

CARBON; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 77955361755     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B8.23553     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Rubash HE, Sinha RK, Shanbhag AS, Kim SY. Pathogenesis of bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1998;29:173-86.
2. Bugbee WD, Culpepper WJ 2nd, Engh CA Jr, Engh CA Sr. Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:1007-12.
3. Nagels J, Stokdijk M, Rozing PM. Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003;12:35-9. (Pubitemid 37443368)
4. Otani T, Whiteside LA, White SE. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:575-85. (Pubitemid 23118721)
5. Østbyhaug PO, Klaksvik J, Romundstad P, Aamodt A. An in vitro study of the strain distribution in human femora with anatomical and customised femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:676-82.
6. Maistrelli GL, Fornasier V, Binnington A, et al. Effect of stem modulus in a total hip arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1991;73-B:43-6.
7. Decking R, Puhl W, Simon U, Claes LE. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006;21:495-501.
8. Morscher E, Mathys R. La prothèse totale isoélastique de hanche fixée sans ciment. Acta Orthop Belg 1974;40:639-47 (in French).
9. Vail TP, Glisson RR, Koukoubis TD, Guilak F. The effect of hip stem material modulus on surface strain in human femora. J Biomech 1998;31:619-28.
10. Huiskes R, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop 1992;274:124-34.
11. Sharpe WN, Pulskamp J, Gianola DS, et al. Strain measurements of silicon dioxide microspecimens by digital imaging processing. Experimental Mechanics 2007;47:649-58.
12. Chen DJ, Chiang FP. Computer-aided speckle interferometry using spectral amplitude fringes. Appl Opt 1985;32:225-36.
13. Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Cappello A, Toni A. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J Biomech 1996;29:525-35.
14. Hua J, Walker PS. Relative motion of hip stems under load: an in vitro study of symmetrical, asymmetrical, and custom asymmetrical designs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994;76-A:95-103.
15. McLeish RD, Charnley J. Abduction forces in the one-legged stance. J Biomech 1970;3:191-209.
16. Morscher EW, Dick W. Cementless fixation of "isoelastic" hip endoprostheses manufactured from plastic materials. Clin Orthop 1983;176:77-87.
17. Evans SL, Gregson PJ. Numerical optimization of the design of a coated, cementless hip prosthesis. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1994;5:507-10.
18. Jones DP, Leach DC, Moore DR. Mechanical properties of poly(ether-ether-ketone) for engineering applications. Polymer 1985;26:1385-93.
19. Reilly DT, Burstein AH, Frankel VH. The elastic modulus for bone. J Biomech 1974;7:271-5.
20. Akay M, Aslan N. Numerical and experimental stress analysis of a polymeric composite hip joint prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;31:167-82.
21. Thompson MS, Schell H, Lienau J, Duda GN. Digital image correlation: a technique for determining local mechanical conditions within early bone callus. Med Eng Phys 2007;29:820-3.
22. Oh I, Harris WH. Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur: an in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip-replacement femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1978;60-A:75-85.
23. Au MK. Isoelastic total hip replacement: clinical evaluation of prosthetic isoelasticity. J Formos Med Assoc 1994;93:497-502.
24. Akhavan S, Matthiesen MM, Schulte L, et al. Clinical and histologic results related to a low-modulus composite total hip replacement stem. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88-A:1308-14.
25. Kärrholm J, Anderberg C, Snorrason F, et al. Evaluation of a femoral stem with reduced stiffness: a randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:1651-8.
26. Maistrelli GL, Fornasier V, Binnington A, et al. Effect of stem modulus in a total hip arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1991;73-B:43-6.
27. Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Toni A, Giunti A. Influence of thigh muscles on the axial strains in a proximal femur during early stance in gait. J Biomech 1995;28:617-24.
28. Phillips ATM. The femur as a musculo-skeletal construct: a free boundary condition modelling approach. Med Eng Phys 2009;31:673-80.
29. Jasty M, O'Connor DO, Henshaw RM, Harrigan TP, Harris WH. Fit of the uncemented femoral component and the use of cement influence the strain transfer the femoral cortex. J Orthop Res 1994;12:648-56.
30. Engh CA, Bobyn JD. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988;231:7-18.