Generalization of case studies in road traffic when defining pre-crash scenarios for active safety function evaluation

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1172-1183

  Ljung Aust, Mikael ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Active safety function evaluation; Crash causation; In depth investigation; Intersection crashes; Pre crash scenarios

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SAFETY; CRASH INVESTIGATION; CRASH TYPE; DATA SETS; DATA SOURCE; IN-DEPTH INVESTIGATION; INTERMEDIATE LAYERS; INTERSECTION CRASHES; LIMITED DATA; ROAD TRAFFIC; WORK-RELATED;

LAW ENFORCEMENT; RESEARCH;

FUNCTION EVALUATION;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADULT; AGED; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CAUSALITY; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; PROTECTIVE DEVICES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955334538     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. J.D. Chovan, L. Tijerina, J.H. Everson, J.A. Pierowicz, and D.L. Hendricks Examination of Intersection, Left turn Across Path Crashes and Potential IVHS countermeasures, Final report: United States 1994 Joint Program Office for Intelligent Transportation Systems Report No: DOT HS 808 164
2. S. Dekker Ten questions about human error: a new view of human factors and system safety 2005 Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
3. S. Dekker Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance Journal of Safety Research 33 3 2002 371 385
4. T.A. Dingus, S.G. Klauer, V.L. Neale, A. Petersen, S.E. Lee, and J. Sudweeks The 100-car naturalistic driving study PHASE II - Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment 2006 Department of Transportation, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, US Report No: DOT HS 810 593
5. FHWA Highway Statistics 2007. Office of Highway Policy Information 2007 Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC available from, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2007/ (accessed 20.11.09)
6. D. Fleury, and T. Brenac Accident prototypical scenarios, a tool for road safety research and diagnostic studies Accident Analysis & Prevention 33 2 2001 267 276
7. General-Motors-Corporation 44 Crashes, Version 3.0 1997 North American Operations, Engineering Safety and Restraints Center, Crash Avoidance Department Warren, MI
8. E. Hollnagel Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) 1998 Elsevier Science
9. E. Hollnagel Barriers and Accident Prevention 2004 Ashgate Burlington, VT
10. E. Hollnagel, D. Woods, and N. Leveson Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts 2006 Ashgate Aldershot
11. R. Kiefer, D. LeBlanc, M. Palmer, J. Salinger, R. Deering, and M. Shulman Development and Validation of Functional Definitions and Evaluation Procedures for Collision Warning/Avoidance Systems 1999 Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Report No: HS-808 964
12. L. Larsen Methods of multidisciplinary in-depth analyses of road traffic accidents Journal of Hazardous Materials 111 2004 115 122
13. Ljung Aust, M., Engström, J., in press. A conceptual framework for requirement specification and evaluation of active safety functions. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.
14. M. Ljung Dream: Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method 2002 Linköping University, Dept of Computer and Information Science Linköping
15. M. Ljung, B. Furberg, and E. Hollnagel Handbok för dream 2.1 (Manual for dream 2.1) 2005 Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Machine and Vehicle Systems Gothenburg
16. M. Ljung, H. Fagerlind, P. Lövsund, and J. Sandin Accident investigations for active safety at Chalmers - new demands require new methodologies Vehicle System Dynamics 45 10 2007 881 894
17. S.B. McLaughlin, J.M. Hankey, and T.A. Dingus A method for evaluating collision avoidance systems using naturalistic driving data Accident Analysis & Prevention 40 1 2008 8 16
18. K. Midtland, R. Muskaug, F. Sagberg, and N.O.C. Jørgensen Evaluation of the In-depth Accident Investigations of the Swedish National Road Administration - Report Summary 1995 TØI Report 296/1995
19. C. Naing, S. Bayer, P. Van Elslande, and K. Fouquet Which factors and situations for human functional failures? - developing grids for accident causation analysis Deliverable 5.2 of the EU FP6 project TRACE 2007 (accessed 5.03.09) available from www.trace-project.org/publication/archives/trace-wp5-d5- 2.pdf
20. W.G. Najm, M. Mironer, J. Koziol, J.S. Wang, and R.R. Knipling Synthesis Report: Examination of Target Vehicular Crashes and Potential its Countermeasures. Final Report 1995 Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Report Number: DOT HS 808 263
21. W.G. Najm, M.P. daSilva, and C.J. Wiacek Estimation of Crash Injury Severity Reduction for Intelligent Vehicle Safety Systems 2000 SAE 2000 World Congress Detroit, MI Paper no. 2000-01-1354
22. W.G. Najm, J. Koopmann, L. Boyle, and D. Smith Development of Test Scenarios for Off-roadway Crash Countermeasures Based on Crash Statistics 2002 Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Report Number: DOT HS 809 505
23. W.G. Najm, J.D. Smith, and D.L. Smith Analysis of Crossing Path Crashes Final Report 2001 Department of Transportation, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, US Report No: DOT HS 809 423
24. W.G. Najm, J.D. Smith, and M. Yanagisawa Pre-crash Scenario Typology for Crash Avoidance Research 2007 Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, US Report No: DOT HS 810 767
25. NCSA National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) General Estimates System (GES) Analytical User's Manual 1988-2004 2005 National Center for Statistics and Analysis Report
26. NCSA Traffic Safety Facts 2006 - A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System 2007 National Center for Statistics and Analysis of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration Washington, DC Report No: DOT HS 810 818
27. OECD Road Accidents: On-site Investigations. Report Prepared by an OECD Expert Group 1988 Road Transport Research Programme Paris
28. B.E. Sabey Accident analysis methodology IATSS Research 14 1 1990 35 42
29. SafetyNet Deliverable 5.2: In-depth Accident Causation Data Study Methodology Development 2005 available from, www.erso.eu/safetynet/content/ safetynet.htm (accessed 12.12.08)
30. SafetyNet Annual Statistical Report 2007 2007 available from, www.erso.eu/safetynet/content/safetynet.htm (accessed 6.11.08)
31. SafetyNet Deliverable 5.8: In-depth Accident Causation Database and Analysis Report 2008 European Road Safety Observatory available from, www.erso.eu/safetynet/content/safetynet.htm (accessed 12.12.08)
32. J. Sandin Aggregating Case Studies of Vehicle Crashes by Means of Causation Charts - An Evaluation and Revision of the Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method 2008 Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden
33. J. Sandin, and M. Ljung Crash investigations for active safety: meeting new demands on investigation methodology Paper Presented at the 1st International Conference on ESAR: Expert Symposium of Accident Research September 3-4, Hannover, Germany 2004
34. J. Sandin, and M. Ljung Understanding the causation of single-vehicle crashes: a methodology for in-depth on-scene multidisciplinary case studies International Journal of Vehicle Safety 2 3 2007 316 333
35. SIKA Road Traffic Injuries 2006 2007 Swedish Institute for Transport and Communication Analysis (SIKA) Stockholm Report No: SIKA statistik 2006:31
36. SNRA Distribution of Licensed Drivers 1980-2008 2009 available from, http://www.vv.se/Pressrum/Statistik/Korkortsstatistik/Korkortsinnehavare-efter- aldersgrupp-/ (accessed 20.11.09)
37. L. Tijerina, J.D. Chovan, J.A. Pierowicz, and D.L. Hendricks Examination of Signalized Intersection, Straight Crossing Path Crashes and Potential IVHS Countermeasures, Final Report 1994 Joint Program Office for Intelligent Transportation Systems United States Report No: DOT HS 808 143
38. H. Wallén Warner, M. Ljung Aust, G. Björklund, E. Johansson, and J. Sandin Manual for dream 3.0, driving reliability and error analysis method. Deliverable D5. 6 of the EU FP6 project SafetyNet 2008 available from, www.erso.eu/safetynet/content/safetynet.htm (accessed 12.12.08)
39. Wallén Warner, H., Sandin, J., 2010. The intercoder agreement when using the driving reliability and error analysis method in road traffic accident investigations. Safety Science, in press.
40. P. Van Elslande, and K. Fouquet Analyzing 'human functional failures' in Road Accidents. Deliverable 5.1 of the EU FP6 project TRACE 2007 (accessed 5.03.09) available from www.trace-project.org/publication/archives/trace-wp5-d5- 1.pdf
41. P. Van Elslande, and K. Fouquet Typical Human Functional Failure-Generating Scenarios: A Way of Aggregation. Deliverable 5.3 of the EU FP6 Project TRACED 2007 (accessed 5.03.09) available from www.trace-project.org/ publication/archives/trace-wp5-d5-3.pdf