The intercoder agreement when using the Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method in road traffic accident investigations

Safety Science

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 527-536

  Warner, Henriette Wallén ^a   Sandin, Jesper ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Causation analysis; DREAM; Intercoder agreement; Traffic accidents

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT SCENARIOS; CAUSATION ANALYSIS; CLASSIFICATION SCHEME; CONTRIBUTING FACTOR; EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS; TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS;

ERROR ANALYSIS; FIRE PROTECTION; HIGHWAY ACCIDENTS; HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; ROADS AND STREETS;

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; CLASSIFICATION; DRIVING ABILITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EUROPE; FEMALE; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RELIABILITY; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TRAFFIC SAFETY; VALIDITY; VELOCITY;

EID: 77950528956     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.12.022     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ACEM, 2003. In-depth Investigations of Motorcycle accidents. Report on the Project Methodology and Process. The motorcycle Industry in Europe (Association des Constructeurs Européens de Motocycles; ACEM), Brussels.
2. Bakeman R. Behavioral observation and coding. Handbook of Research: Methods in Social and Personality Psychology 2000, 138-159. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. H.T. Reis, C.M. Judd (Eds.).
3. Baker J.S. Experimental Case Studies of Traffic Accidents 1960, Traffic Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
4. Carsten O.M.J., Tight M.R., Southwell M.T., Plows B. Urban Accidents: Why do They Happen? 1989, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds.
5. Dingus, T.A., Klauer, S.G., Neale, V.L., Petersen, A., Lee, S.E., Sudweeks, J., et al., 2006. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study. Phase II: Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment (Rep. No. DOT HS 810 593). Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg, VA.
6. Grayson G.B., Hakkert A.S. Accident analysis and conflict behaviour. Road Users and Traffic Safety 1987, 27-59. Van Gorcum, Assen. J.A. Rothengatter, R.A. de Bruin (Eds.).
7. Hale A.R., Ale B.J.M., Goossens L.H.J., Heijer T., Bellamy L.J., Mud M.L., et al. Modeling accidents for prioritizing prevention. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2007, 92:1701-1715.
8. Hollnagel E. CREAM: Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method 1998, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
9. Hollnagel E. Barriers and Accident Prevention 2004, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., Aldershot.
10. Hollnagel E., Woods D.D. Joint cognitive systems. Foundation of Cognitive Systems Engineering 2005, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, New York.
11. Kolbe R.H., Burnett M.S. Content-analysis research: an examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. Journal of Consumer Research 1991, 18:243-250.
12. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology 2004, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
13. Larsen L. Methods of multidisciplinary in-depth analyses of road traffic accidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2004, 111:115-122.
14. Ljung, M., 2002. DREAM: Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method. Master's Thesis, University of Linköping's. retrieved 10.12.2009. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-2033.
15. Ljung M. Manual for SNACS 1.1: SafetyNet Accident Causation System 2006, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
16. Ljung, M., Furberg, B., Hollnagel, E., n.d. Handbook för DREAM 2.1. [Manual for DREAM 2.1].
17. Midtland, K., Muskaug, R., Sagberg, F., Jørgensen, N.O., 1995. Evaluering av Vägverkets haveriundersøkelser [Evaluation of the in-depth accident investigations of the Swedish Road Administration] (TØI Rep. No. 296/1995). Institute of Transport Economics (TØI), Oslo, Norway.
18. OECD Road Accidents: On-site Investigations 1988, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris.
19. World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention Summary 2004, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. M. Peden, R. Scurfield, D. Sleet, D. Mohan, A.A. Hyder, E. Jarawan (Eds.).
20. Pineault M., Rossignol M., Barr R.G. Inter-rater analysis of a classification scheme of occupational fatalities by electrocution. Journal of Safety Research 1994, 25:107-115.
21. Reason J. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents 1997, Ashgate, Aldershot, England.
22. Sandin J. An analysis of common patterns in aggregated causation charts from intersection crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2009, 41:624-632.
23. Sandin, J., Ljung, M., 2004. Crash investigations for active safety: meeting new demands on investigation methodology. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on ESAR: Expert Symposium of Accident Research, Hannover, Germany.
24. Smith C.P. Content analysis and narrative analysis. Handbook of Research: Methods in Social and Personality Psychology 2000, 313-335. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. H.T. Reis, C.M. Judd (Eds.).
25. Staughton, G.C., Storie, V.J., 1977. Methodology of an In-depth Accident Investigation Survey (TRL Rep. No. 762). Transport and Road Research Laboratory (TRL), Crowthorne, Berkshire.
26. Treat, J.R., Tumbas, N.S., McDonald, S.T., Shinar, D., Hume, R.D., Mayer, R.E., et al., 1977. Tri-level Study of the Causes of Traffic Accidents: Final Report, vol. 2: Special Analyses, DOT-HS-034-3-535-77-TAC(2). Institute for Research in Public Safety, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
27. Wagenaar W.A., van der Schrier J. Accident analysis: the goal and how to get there. Safety Science 1997, 26:25-33.
28. Wallén Warner, H., Ljung Aust, M., Sandin, J., Johansson, E., Björklund, G., 2008. Manual for DREAM 3.0: Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method. Deliverable D5.6 of the EU FP6 Project SafetyNet, TREN-04-FP6TRSI2.395465/506723.