"Doing prescribing": How might clinicians work differently for better, safer care

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 12, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages

  Elwyn, G ^a   Edwards, A ^a   Britten, N ^b  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPETENCE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SERVICE; PATIENT CARE; PRESCRIPTION; REVIEW;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHILOSOPHY, MEDICAL; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRESCRIPTIONS, DRUG;

EID: 0346343555     PISSN: 09638172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Haynes RB, McDonald H, Garg AX, et al. Interventions for helping patients to follow prescriptions for medications (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Oxford: Update Software, 2003.
2. Britten N, Ukoumunne O, Boulton MG. Patients' attitudes to medicines and expectations for prescriptions. Health Expectations 2002;5:256-69.
3. Coulter A. The autonomous patient. London: The Nuffield Trust, 2002.
4. McDonald HP, Garg AX, Haynes RB. Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: scientific review. JAMA 2002;288:2868-79.
5. Carter S, Taylor D. A question of choice - compliance in medicine taking. London: Medicine Partnership, Royal Pharmaceutical Centre, 2003.
6. Cox K, Stevenson F, Britten N, et al. A systematic review of communication between patients and health care professionals about medicine-taking and prescribing. London: GKT Concordance Unit, King's College London, 2002.
7. Marinker M. From compliance to concordance: achieving shared goals in medicine taking. BMJ 1997;314:747-8.
8. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P. Shared decision making: the neglected second half of the consultation. Brit J Gen Pract 1999;49:477-82.
9. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, et al. Fleeting glimpses of shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:93-99.
10. Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, et al. Doctor-patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:829-40.
11. Campion P, Foulkes J, Neighbour R, et al. Patient centredness in the MRCGP video examination: analysis of large cohort. BMJ 2002;325:691-692.
12. Britten N, Stevenson FA, Barry CA, et al. Misunderstandings in prescribing decisions in general practice: qualitative study. BMJ 2000;320:484-8.
13. Barry CA, Bradley CP, Britten N, et al. Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. BMJ 2000;320:1246-50.
14. Donovan JL, Blake DR. Patient non-compliance: deviance or reasoned decision-making? Soc Sci Med 1992;34:507-13.
15. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley A. Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. BMJ 2002;324:827-830.
16. Elwyn G, Edwards P, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: defining the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Brit J Gen Pract 2000;50:892-9.
17. Stevenson FA, Britten N, Barry CA, et al. Self-treatment and its discussion in medical consultations: how is medical pluralism managed in practice? Soc Sci Med 2003;57:513-27.
18. Weinstein ND. What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. J Nat Can Inst Mono 1999:25.
19. Bekker H. Genetic testing: facilitating informed choices. In: Encyclopaedia of the human genome: ethical, legal and social issues. Thomas N, ed. New York: Nature Publishing Group, 2003.
20. Drew P, Chatwin J, Collins S. Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals. Health Expect 2001;4:58-70.
21. Gafaranga J, Britten N. "Fire away": the opening sequence in general practice consultations. Fam Pract 2003;20:242-47.
22. Ashcroft A, Hope T, Parker M. Ethical issues and evidence based patient choice. In: Evidence based patient choice: inevitable or impossible. Elwyn G, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
23. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, et al. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 2002;288:2469-75.
24. Simon GE, Von Korff M, Rutter C, et al. Randomised trial of monitoring, feedback, and management of care by telephone to improve treatment of depression in primary care. BMJ 2000;320:550-554.
25. The Task Force on Medicines Partnership. The task force on medicines partnership. Department of Health, 2003. http://www.medicines-partnership.org.
26. Jenkins L, Britten N, Barber N, et al. Resource pack for reviewing and monitoring prescribing. London: GKT Concordance Unit, King's College, 2002.
27. Ahearn LM. Language and Agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 2001;30:109-37.