Sex differences in the strategies used by rats to solve a navigation task

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 395-401

  Rodríguez, Clara A ^a   Torres, Angélica ^b   Mackintosh, N J ^c   Chamizo, V D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Landmark learning; Morris water maze; Rats; Sex differences; Shape learning

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; MALE; MAZE TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; RAT; REACTION TIME; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; RATS; REACTION TIME; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

RATTUS;

EID: 77955330663     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0017297     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Astur R.S., Ortiz M.L., Sutherland R.J. A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference. Behavioural Brain Research 1998, 93:185-190.
2. Beatty W.W., Troster A.I. The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles 1987, 20:327-344.
3. Burkitt J., Widman D., Saucier D.E. Evidence for the influence of testosterone in the performance of spatial navigation in a virtual water maze in women but not in men. Hormones and Behavior 2007, 51:649-654.
4. Chai X.J., Jacobs L.F. Sex differences in directional cue use in a virtual landscape. Behavioral Neuroscience 2009, 123:276-283.
5. Choi J., Silverman I. Processes underlying sex differences in route-learning strategies in children and adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences 2003, 34:1153-1166.
6. Coluccia E., Louse G. Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2004, 24:329-340.
7. Dabbs J.M., Chang E.L., Strong R.A., Milun R. Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior 1998, 19:89-98.
8. Einon D. Spatial memory and response strategies in rats: Age, sex and rearing differences in performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:473-489.
9. Forcano L., Santamaría J.J., Mackintosh N.J., Chamizo V.D. Single landmark learning: Sex differencies in a navigation task. Learning and Motivation 2009, 40:46-61.
10. Galea L.A.M., Kimura D. Sex differences in route learning. Personality and Individual Differences 1993, 14:53-65.
11. Halpern D.F. Sex differences in cognitive abilities 1992, Erlbaum, Hillsdale N. J. 2nd ed.
12. Jones C.M., Healy S.D. Differences in cue use and spatial memory in men and women. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B) 2006, 273:2241-2247.
13. Kimura D. Sex and cognition 1999, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Lawton C.A. Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles 1994, 30:765-779.
15. Lawton C.A., Charleston S.I., Zieles A.S. Individual- and gender-related differences in indoor wayfinding. Environment and Behavior 1996, 28:204-219.
16. MacFadden A., Elias L., Saucier D. Males and females scan maps similarly, but give directions differently. Brain and Cognition 2003, 53:297-300.
17. Mackintosh N.J. IQ and Human Intelligence 1998, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Morris R.G.M. Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. Learning and Motivation 1981, 12:239-260.
19. Roof R.L., Stein D.G. Gender differences in Morris water maze performance depend on task parameters. Physiology and Behavior 1999, 68:81-86.
20. Sandstrom N.J., Kaufman J., Huettel S.A. Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. Cognitive Brain Research 1998, 6:351-360.
21. Saucier D.M., Bowman M., Elias L.J. Sex differences in the effect of articulatory or spatial dual-task interference during navigation. Brain and Cognition 2003, 53:346-350.
22. Saucier D.M., Green S.M., Leason J., MacFadden A., Bell S., Elias L.J. Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies?. Behavioral Neuroscience 2002, 116:403-410.
23. Saucier D.M., Shultz S.R., Keller A.J., Cook C.M., Binsted G. Sex differences in object location memory and spatial navigation in Long-Evans rats. Animal Cognition 2008, 11:129-137.
24. Sava S., Markus E.J. Intramaze cue utilization in the water maze: Effects of sex and estrous cycle in rats. Hormones and Behavior 2005, 48:23-33.
25. Schmitz S. Gender-related strategies in environmental development: Effects of anxiety on wayfinding in and representation of a three-dimensional maze. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1997, 17:215-228.
26. Seymoure P., Dou H., Juraska J.M. Sex differences in radial maze performance: Influence of rearing environment and room cues. Psychobiology 1996, 24:33-37.
27. Williams C.L., Barnett A.M., Meck W.H. Organizational effects of early gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory. Behavioral Neuroscience 1990, 104:84-97.
28. Wilson, P. N., Carter, P., Woulfe, T., & Southall, B. (submitted). The role of landmarks and path structure in the shortcut performance of men and women.