Value-based network mobilization: A case study of modern environmental networkers

Industrial Marketing Management

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 898-907

  Ritvala, Tiina ^a   Salmi, Asta ^a  

^a HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

Baltic Sea; Common issues; Environment; Mobilization; Value based networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955329182     PISSN: 00198501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Agndal H., Axelsson B. Internationalisation of the firm - The influence of relationship sediments. Critical perspectives on internationalisation 2002, Elsevier, Netherlands. V. Havila, M. Forsgren, H. Håkansson (Eds.).
2. Araujo L., Brito C. Agency and constitutional ordering in networks. International Studies of Management and Organization 1998, 27(4):22-46.
3. Axelsson B., Johanson J. Foreign market entry - The textbook vs. the network view. Industrial networks. A new view of reality 1992, Routledge, London. B. Axelsson, G. Easton (Eds.).
4. Borghini S., Carù A., Cova B. Representing BtoB reality in case study research: Challenges and new opportunities. Industrial Marketing Management 2010, 39(1):16-24.
5. Brito C. Issue-based nets: A methodological approach to the sampling issue in industrial network research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 1999, 2(2):92-102.
6. Brito C. Towards an institutional theory of the dynamics of industrial networks. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 2001, 16(3):150-166.
7. Dahan N., Doh J., Guay T. The role of multinational corporations in transnational institution building: A policy network perspective. Human Relations 2006, 59(11):1571-1600.
8. Dubois A., Gadde L.-E. Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research 2002, 55(7):553-560.
9. Dyer W.Gibb, Wilkins A.L. Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: a rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review 1991, 16(3):613-619.
10. Easton G. Industrial networks: A review. Industrial networks: A new view of reality 1992, 3-34. Routledge, London. B. Axelsson, G. Easton (Eds.).
11. Easton G. Methodology and industrial networks. Business marketing: An interaction and network perspective 1995, 411-491. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Norwell, MA. K. Möller, D.T. Wilson (Eds.).
12. Fligstein N. Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist 1997, 40(4):397-405.
13. Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 1973, 78(6):1360-1380.
14. Greenwood R., Suddaby R. Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal 2006, 49(1):27-48.
15. Hadjikhani A., Ghauri P. The behaviour of international firms in socio-political environments in the European Union. Journal of Business Research 2001, 52(3):263-275.
16. Hadjikhani A., Lee J.-W., Ghauri P. Network view of MNCs' socio-political behaviour. Journal of Business Research 2008, 61(9):912-924.
17. Håkansson H., Snehota I. Developing relationships in business networks 1995, Routledge, London.
18. Halinen A., Salmi A., Havila V. From dyadic change to changing business networks: An analytical framework. Journal of Management Studies 1999, 36(6):779-794.
19. Halinen A., Törnroos J.-Å. Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks. Journal of Business Research 2005, 58(9):1285-1297.
20. Helsinki Commission 30years of protecting the Baltic Sea - HELCOM 1974-2004 2004, Helsinki Commission, Helsinki.
21. Helsinki Commission HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan. HELCOM Ministerial Meeting, Krakow, Poland, 15 November 2007 2007, Helsinki Commission, Helsinki.
22. Hoffman A.J. Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal 1999, 42(4):351-371.
23. Hoffman A.J. Linking social systems analysis to the industrial ecology framework. Organization & Environment 2003, 16(1):66-86.
24. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 1984, 39(4):341-350.
25. Lawrence T.B., Phillips N. From Moby Dick to Free Willy: Macro-cultural discourse and institutional entrepreneurship in emerging institutional fields. Organization 2004, 11(5):689-711.
26. Lundgren A. Coordination and mobilization processes in industrial networks. Industrial networks: A new view of reality 1992, Routledge, New York. B. Axelsson, G. Easton (Eds.).
27. Lundgren A. Technological innovation and network evolution 1995, Routledge, London.
28. Maduro O. Religion and social conflicts 1982, Orbis, Maryknoll, NY.
29. Möller K. Sense-making and agenda construction in emerging business networks - How to direct radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management 2010, 39(3):361-371.
30. Möller K., Svahn S. How to influence the birth of new business fields - Network perspective. Industrial Marketing Management 2009, 38(4):450-458.
31. Mouzas S., Naudé P. Network mobilizer. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 2007, 22(1):62-71.
32. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23(2):242-266.
33. Olson M. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups 1965, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. Ostrom E. [1990] Allmänningen som samhällsinstitution (Original title: Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action) 2009, Cambridge University Press.
35. Outokumpu Annual Report (2009). Accessed May 5th, 2010. https://webmail.hkkk.fi/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://ar.outokumpu.com/files/outokumpu/Downloads/Outokumpu_Annual_Report_2009.pdf.
36. Partanen J., Möller K., Westerlund M., Rajala R., Rajala A. Social capital in the growth of science-and-technology-based SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management 2008, 37(5):513-522.
37. Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods 2002, Sage, London. 3rd Edition.
38. Piekkari R., Plakoyiannaki E., Welch C. 'Good' case research in industrial marketing: Insights from research practice. Industrial Marketing Management 2010, 39(1):109-117.
39. Ritvala T., Granqvist N. Institutional entrepreneurs and local embedding of global scientific ideas - The case of preventing heart disease in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Management 2009, 25(2):133-145.
40. Ritvala T., Salmi A. Mobilization of issue networks: The case of fighting heart disease in Finland. International Journal of Business Environment 2009, 2(4):400-417.
41. Rokeach M. The nature of human values 1973, The Free Press, New York, NY.
42. Rowley T., Moldoveanu M. When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review 2003, 28(2):204-219.
43. Scheufele D., Tewksbury D. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication 2007, 57(1):9-20.
44. Suchman M.C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20(3):571-610.
45. Welch C., Wilkinson I. The political embeddedness of international business networks. International Marketing Review 2004, 21(2):216-231.
46. Wijen F., Ansari S. Overcoming inaction through collective institutional entrepreneurship: Insights from regime theory. Organization Studies 2007, 28(7):1079-1100.