Measuring the positional accuracy of computer assisted surgical tracking systems

Computer Aided Surgery

Volumn 15, Issue 1-3, 2010, Pages 13-18

  Clarke, J V ^a,b   Deakin, A H ^a,b   Nicol, A C ^b   Picard, F ^a  

^a GOLDEN JUBILEE NATIONAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Computer assisted surgery; Optical tracking; Registration

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 77955325320     PISSN: 10929088     EISSN: 10970150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10929081003775774     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Siston RA, Giori NJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL. Surgical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: A perspective. J Biomech. 2007;40:728-735.
2. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004;86-B:682-687.
3. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer- assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: A randomized, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004;86-B:372-377.
4. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support: A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2003;85-B:830-835.
5. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007;89-A:236-243.
6. DiGioia AM, Mor AB, Jaramaz B, Bach JM. Accuracy and validation for surgical navigation systems. AAOS Bulletin 2005;53(5).
7. Robinson M, Eckhoff DG, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Bach JM. Variability of landmark identification in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;442:57-62.
8. Spencer JMF, Day RE, Sloan KE, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation of the acetabular component: A cadaver reliability study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006;88-B:972-975.
9. Mayr E, Moctezuma de la Barrera J-L, Eller G, Bach C, Nogler M. The effect of fixation and location on the stability of the markers in navigated total hip arthro- plasty: A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006;88- B:168-172.
10. Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup - accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol 2006;58:294-300.
11. Siu D, Cooke TD, Broekhoven LD, Lam M, Fisher B, Saunders G, Challis TW. A standardized technique for lower limb radiography. Practice, applications, and error analysis. Invest Radiol 1991;26(1):71-77.
12. ASTM International. Standard Practice for Measurement of Positional Accuracy of Computer Assisted Surgical Systems, February 2007 draft.
13. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: No difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007;89-B:477-480.
14. Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Giinther K-P, Kirschner S. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: A comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008;90-B:1039-1044.