Practice benefit from participating in a practice-based research network study of postpartum depression: A National Research Network (NRN) report

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 455-464

  Yawn, Barbara P ^a   Pace, Wilson ^b   Dietrich, Allen ^c   Bertram, Susan ^a   Kurland, Margary ^a   Graham, Deborah ^b   Huff, Jessica ^b   Rocca, Liliana ^a   Wollan, Peter ^a  

^a OLMSTED MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

PBRN; Postpartum depression; Practice based research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE BASED RESEARCH NETWORK; PUERPERAL DEPRESSION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RURAL AREA; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; UNITED STATES; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMUNITY CARE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION, POSTPARTUM; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNITY NETWORKS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION, POSTPARTUM; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 77955302057     PISSN: 15572625     EISSN: 15587118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.04.090246     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA 2008;299:211-3.
2. van Weel C, Smith H, Beasley JW. Family practice research networks. Experiences from 3 countries. J Fam Pract 2000;49:938-43.
3. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research - " Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297:403-6.
4. Westfall JM, VanVorst RF, Main DS, Herbert C. Community-based participatory research in practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2006;4:8-14. (Pubitemid 43243907)
5. Kottke TE, Solberg LI, Nelson AF, et al. Optimizing practice through research: a new perspective to solve an old problem. Ann Fam Med 2008;6:459-62.
6. van Weel C. Longitudinal research and data collection in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2005;3(Suppl 1):S46-51.
7. Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med 2005;3(Suppl 1):S12-20.
8. van Weel C, van Weel-Baumgarten E, Mold J. The importance of longitudinal studies in family medicine: experiences of two practice-based research networks. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:69-74. (Pubitemid 44046996)
9. Kuo GM, Steinbauer JR, Spann SJ. Conducting medication safety research projects in a primary care physician practice-based research network. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2008;48:163-70.
10. Lindbloom EJ, Ewigman BG, Hickner JM. Practice-based research networks: the laboratories of primary care research. Med Care 2004;42(4 Suppl):III45-9.
11. Anderko L, Bartz C, Lundeen S. Practice-based research networks: nursing centers and communities working collaboratively to reduce health disparities. Nurs Clin North Am 2005;40:747-58, xi-xii. (Pubitemid 41736275)
12. Finch SA, Lalama C, Spino C, et al. Practice-based research network solutions to methodological challenges encountered in a national, prospective cohort study of mothers and newborns. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2008;22:87-98. (Pubitemid 350308502)
13. Spontaneous abortion in primary care. A report from ASPN. J Am Board Fam Pract 1988;1:15-23.
14. Mold JW, Thompson DM. Management of brown recluse spider bites in primary care. J Am Board Fam Pract 2004;17:347-52.
15. Lydick E, Martin A, Yawn B. Impact of fears on quality of life in patients with a silent disease: osteoporosis. Clin Ther 1996;18:1307-15.
16. Cacy J, Mold JW. The clinical characteristics of brown recluse spider bites treated by family physicians: an OKPRN Study. Oklahoma Physicians Research Network. J Fam Pract 1999;48:536-42.
17. Yawn BP, Barrette BA, Wollan PC. Ovarian cancer: the neglected diagnosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79:1277-82.
18. Yawn BP, Saddier P, Wollan PC, St Sauver JL, Kurland MJ, Sy LS. A population-based study of the incidence and complication rates of herpes zoster before zoster vaccine introduction. Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82:1341-9.
19. Yawn BP, Wollan P, Kurland M, Scanlon P. A longitudinal study of the prevalence of asthma in a community population of school-age children. J Pediatr 2002;140:576-81.
20. Yawn B, Zyzanski SJ, Goodwin MA, Gotler RS, Stange KC. The anatomy of asthma care visits in community family practice. J Asthma 2002;39:719-28.
21. Chandler JM, Martin AR, Girman C, et al. Reliability of an Osteoporosis-Targeted Quality of Life survey instrument for use in the community: OPTQoL. Osteoporos Int 1998;8:127-35.
22. Olson Al, Dietrich AJ, Prazar G, Hurley J. Brief maternal depression screening at well-child visits. Pediatrics 2006;118:207-16.
23. Dietrich AJ, Oxman TE, Williams JW, et al. Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004;329:602-9.
24. Yawn B, Bertram S, Wollan P. Introduction of Asthma APGAR tools improve asthma management in primary care practices. J Asthma Allergy. Available at http://www.dovepress.com/introduction-of-asthma-apgar-tools-improve-asthma- management-in-primar-peer-reviewed-article-JAA. Accessed 27 May 2010.
25. Tierney WM, Oppenheimer CC, Hudson BL, et al. A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:242-50.
26. Fagnan LJ, Morris C, Shipman SA, Holub J, King A, Angier H. Characterizing a practice-based research network: Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network (ORPRN) survey tools. J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:204-19.
27. Niebauer L, Nutting PA. Practice-based research networks: the view from the office. J Fam Pract 1994;38:409-14.
28. Love MM, Pearce KA, Williamson MA, Barron MA, Shelton BJ. Patients, practices, and relationships: challenges and lessons learned from the Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN) CaRESS clinical trial. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:75-84.
29. Goode JV, Mott DA, Chater R. Collaborations to facilitate success of community pharmacy practice-based research networks. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2008;48:153-62.
30. Nyiendo J, Llyod C Haas M. Practice-based research: the Oregon Experience. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001;24:25-33.
31. Zafar A, Tierney W, Hickner J, Pace W. An adverse drug event and medication error reporting system for ambulatory care (MEADERS). AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008;839-43.
32. Cifuentes M, Fernald DH, Green LA, et al. Prescription for health: changing primary care practice to foster healthy behaviors. Ann Fam Med 2005;3(Suppl 2):S4-11.
33. Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med 2005;3(Suppl 1):S12-20.
34. Deshefy-Longhi T, Swartz MK, Grey M. Characterizing nurse practitioner practice by sampling patient encounters: an APRNet study. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2008;20:281-7.
35. van Weel C, de Grauw W. Family practices registration networks contributed to primary care research. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:779-83.
36. Andrews JE, Pearce KA, Ireson C, Love MM. Information-seeking behaviors of practitioners in a primary care practice-based research network (PBRN). J Med Libr Assoc 2005;93:206-12.
37. Orzano A, Scott J, Hudson S, et al. Strategies for conducting complex clinical trials in diverse community practices. Medical Care 2007;45:1221-6.
38. Voorhees K, Fernald DH, Emsermann C, et al. Underinsurance in primary care: a report from the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP). J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21:309-16.
39. Young WF, McGloin J, Zittleman L, West DR, Westfall JM. Predictors of colorectal screening in rural Colorado: testing to prevent colon cancer in the high plains research network. J Rural Health 2007;23:238-45.
40. Yawn B, Graham D, Bertram S, et al. Practice-based research network studies and institutional review boards: two new issues. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:453-60.
41. Crabtree BC, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.
42. Finkelstein JA, Lozano P, Streiff KA, et al. Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems: lessons from the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT. Patient Outcomes Research Team. Health Serv Res 2002;37:775-89.
43. Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, Davis C, et al. Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2001;27:63-80.
44. Pearson ML, Wu S, Schaefer J, et al. Assessing the implementation of the chronic care model in quality improvement collaboratives. Health Serv Res 2005;40:978-96.
45. Solberg LI, Kottke TE, Brekke ML. Quality improvement in primary care: the role of organization, collaboratives, and managed care. In: McLaughlin CP, Kalunzny AD, eds. Continuous quality improvement in head care: theory, implementation, and applications. 3rd ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers; 2005:297-317.
46. Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness. Eff Clin Pract 1998;1:1-4.
47. Solberg LI. Guideline implementation: what the literature doesn't tell us. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2000;26:525-37.
48. Kuo HT, Yin TJ, Li IC. Relationship between organization empowerment and job satisfaction as perceived by nursing assistants at long-term care facilities. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:3059-66.
49. Harrisson M, Loiselle CG, Duquette A, Semenic SE. Hardiness, work support and psychological distress among nursing assistants and registered nurses in Quebec. J Adv Nurs 2002;38:584-91.
50. Friesen D. Skill mix literature review. Healthc Manage Forum 1996;9:48-52.
51. Stearns SC, D'Arcy LP. Staying the course: facility and profession retention among nursing assistants in nursing homes. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2008;63:S113-21.
52. Bate SP, Robert G. Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: lessons for modernizing the National Health Service in England and Wales. Public Admin 2002;80:243-63.
53. Øvretveit J, Bate P, Cleary P, et al. Quality collaboratives: lessons from research. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:345-51.
54. Lindenauer PK. Effects of quality improvement collaboratives. BMJ 2008;336:1448-9.
55. Cohen D, McDaniel RR, Crabtree BF, et al. A practice change model for quality improvement in primary care practice. J Healthc Manag 2004;49:155-68, discussion 169-70.
56. Miller WL, Crabtree BF, McDaniel RR, Stange KC. Understanding change in primary care practice using complexity theory. J Fam Pract 1998;46:369-76.
57. Miller WL, McDaniel RR, Crabtree BF, Stange KC. Practice jazz: understanding variation in family practices using complexity science. J Fam Pract 2001;50:872-8.
58. Peter M. Senge. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Random House; 1994.
59. Solberg LI. Improving medical practice: a conceptual framework. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:251-6.
60. Snyder L, Neubauer RL. Pay-for-performance principles that promote patient-centered care: an ethics manifesto. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:792-4.
61. Mandel KE, Kotagal UR. Pay for performance alone cannot drive quality. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:650-5.
62. Foels T, Hewner S. Integrating pay for performance with educational strategies to improve diabetes care. Popul Health Manag 2009;12:121-9.
63. Green LA, Hickner J. A short history of primary care practice-based research networks: from concept to essential research laboratories. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:1-10.
64. Green LA, Hames CG Sr, Nutting PA. Potential of practice-based research networks: experiences from ASPN. J Fam Pract 1994;38:400-6.