Optimal reserve capacity allocation with consideration of customer reliability requirements

Energy

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 3883-3890

  Najafi, M ^a   Ehsan, M ^b   Fotuhi Firuzabad, M ^b   Akhavein, A ^c   Afshar, K ^d  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^c ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^d IMAM KHOMEINI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cost benefit trade off; Flexible Value of Lost Load (FVOLL); Interruptible Loads (ILs); Optimal reserve capacity; Reliability requirements; Stochastic capacity allocation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRIC LOAD MANAGEMENT; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; OUTAGES; RELIABILITY; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

INTERRUPTIBLE LOAD; OPTIMAL RESERVE CAPACITY; STOCHASTIC CAPACITY; STOCHASTIC CAPACITY ALLOCATION; TRADE OFF; VALUE OF LOST LOAD;

COMMERCE;

ALGORITHM; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY MARKET; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POWER GENERATION; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 77955282366     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.044     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Wu L., Member I.E.E.E., Shahidehpour M., Li T. Cost of reliability analysis based on stochastic unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2008, 23(3):1364-1373.
2. Wang J., Wang X., Wu Y. Operating reserve model in the power market. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2005, 20(1):223-229.
3. Afshar K., Ehsan M., Fotuhi-Firuzabad M., Amjady N. Cost-benefit analysis and MILP for optimal reserve capacity determination in power system. Appl Math Comput 2008, 196:752-761.
4. Afshar K., Ehsan M., Fotuhi-Firuzabad M., Amjady N. A method for reserve clearing in disaggregated model considering lost opportunity cost. Elect Power Syst Res 2008, 78:527-538.
5. Aghaei J., Shayanfar H.A., Amjady N. Joint market clearing in a stochastic framework considering power system security. Appl Energy 2009, 86:1675-1682.
6. Walawalkar R., Fernands S., Thakur N., Chevva K.R. Evolution and current status of demand response (DR) in electricity markets: insights from PJM and NYISO. Energy 2010, 35(4):1553-1560.
7. Shayesteh E., Yousefi A., Parsa Moghaddam M. A probabilistic risk-based approach for spinning reserve provision using day-ahead demand response program. Energy 2010, 35(5):1908-1915.
8. Zarnikau J.W. Demand participation in the restructured Electric Reliability Council of Texas market. Energy 2010, 35(4):1536-1543.
9. Mok Y.L., Chung T.S. Prediction of domestic, industrial and commercial interruption costs by relational approach. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. advances in power system control, operation and management 1997, APSCOM-97 (Conf. Publ. No. 450), p. 209-15.
10. Gedra T.W., Varaiya P.P. Markets and pricing for interruptible electric power. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1993, 8(1):122-128.
11. Bhattacharya K., Bollen H.J.M., Daalder J.E. Real time optimal interruptible tariff mechanism incorporating utility-customer interactions. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2000, 15(2):700-706.
12. Dupačová J., Gröwe-Kuska N., Römisch W. Scenario reduction in stochastic programming: an approach using probability metrics. Math Program Ser A 2003, 95:493-511.
13. Grigg C., Wong P., Albrecht P., Allan R., Bhavaraju M., Billinton R., et al. The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the Reliability Test System. Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1999, 14(3):1010-1020.
14. Wang C., Shahidehpour S.M. Effects of ramp-rate limits on unit commitment and economic dispatch. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1993, 8(3):1341-1350.
15. Ouyang Z., Shahidehpour S.M. Heuristic multi-area unit commitment with economic dispatch. Proc Inst Elect Eng Gen Transm Distrib 1991, 138(3):242-252.
16. http://www.neplan.ch.
17. GAMS: a user's guide. http://www.gams.com.