Demand participation in the restructured Electric Reliability Council of Texas market

Energy

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1536-1543

  Zarnikau, Jay W ^a,b  

^a Frontier Associates   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Demand response; ERCOT; Restructured electricity markets

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; COMPETITION;

ANCILLARY SERVICE; COMPETITIVE MARKETS; DEMAND RESPONSE; DEMAND-SIDE; ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS; ELECTRICITY MARKET; HIGHLY SENSITIVE; MARKET DESIGN; REGULATED UTILITIES; REGULATORY INTERVENTIONS; RESTRUCTURED ELECTRICITY MARKETS;

DEREGULATION;

DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; DEREGULATION; ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL COMPETITION; INDUSTRIAL RESTRUCTURING; UTILITY SECTOR;

TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77949272222     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.03.018     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alliance for Retail Choice. ARC's baseline assessment of choice in the United States (ABACUS) (May 2007). http://www.allianceforretailchoice.com/ABACUSpublication.pdf
2. Center for Advancement of Energy Markets. Retail energy deregulation index. 4th ed. (2003), Center for Advancement of Energy Markets. http://www.caem.org/website/pdf/RED2003.pdf
3. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Working paper on standardized transmission service and wholesale electric market design (March 15, 2002). http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp
4. Adib P., and Zarnikau J. Texas: the most robust electricity market in North America. In: Sioshansi F. (Ed). Electricity market reform: an international perspective (2006), Elsevier 383-418
5. Zarnikau J. Using interruptible load as an ancillary service in the restructured ERCOT market. US Energy Association Dialogue (2006, July). Available from: http://www.usaee.org/pdf/Aug06.pdf#13d
6. PUCT Market Oversight Division. Project No. 22209: 2000 annual update of generating electric utility data (December 2000). http://www.puc.state.tx.us/ Austin, TX
7. Public Utility Commission of Texas. Final order in docket No. 23220: petition of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas for approval of the ERCOT protocols (2000). http://www.puc.state.tx.us/ Austin, TX
8. Public Utility Commission of Texas. Docket No. 31540: proceeding to consider protocols to implement a Nodal market in ERCOT pursuant to PUC Subst. R. 25.501 (November 2005). http://www.puc.state.tx.us/ Austin, TX
9. Electric Reliability Council of Texas. ERCOT protocols. www.ercot.com
10. ERCOT Staff for the Reliability and Operations Subcommittee. Utilizing high-set load shedding schemes to provide responsive reserve services (November 2002). http://www.ercot.com Austin, TX
11. ERCOT Demand Side Working Group. Load participation in the ERCOT Nodal market (2007). http://www.ercot.com
12. Jones S., Wattles P., and Krein S. ERCOT emergency load response. PUCT demand response workshop (September 15, 2006). http://www.puc.state.tx.us/electric/projects/32853/091506/ERCOT.pdf See
13. Zarnikau J., and Hallett I. Aggregate industrial energy consumer response to wholesale prices in the restructured Texas electricity market. Energy Economics 30 4 (2008) 1798-1808
14. ERCOT Staff. Load response survey: preliminary results. Presentation to ERCOT's Demand Side Working Group; August 10, 2007.
15. Caves D., Eakin K., and Faruqui A. Mitigating price spikes in wholesale markets through market-based pricing in retail markets. Electricity Journal 13 3 (2000) 13-23
16. Trefny F. BUL program status. Presentation at PUCT demand response workshop (December 8, 2006). http://www.puc.state.tx.us/electric/projects/32853/32853.cfm See also:
17. Public Utility Commission of Texas. Docket No. 32615: petition of Chaparral Steel Co., Structural Metals, Inc., and Nucor steel for the adoption of a rule to implement a tiered frequency response service. http://www.puc.state.tx.us/
18. Public Utility Commission of Texas. Docket No. 32853: evaluation of demand response programs in the competitive electric market. http://www.puc.state.tx.us/
19. Patton D. Rebuttal testimony on behalf of the Staff of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, PUCT Docket No. 31540: proceeding to consider protocols to implement a Nodal market in ERCOT pursuant to PUC Subst. R. 25.501 (November 2005). http://www.puc.state.tx.us/
20. Oren S, Stephen Smith, Robert Wilson. Priority service: unbundling quality attributes of electric power. EPRI Report EA-4871; November 1986.
21. Zarnikau, J, Shmuel Oren. Long-term BUL offers. Presentation to the ERCOT Demand Side Working Group; October 2005.
22. Frontier Associates. Demand response pilot: status and preliminary recommendations. Presentation to the Center of Commercialization of Electric Technologies; January 9, 2009.
23. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Assessment of demand response and advanced metering (August 2006). http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/demand-response.pdf