Valuing open space in a residential sorting model of the Twin Cities

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 57-77

  Allen Klaiber, H ^a   Phaneuf, Daniel J ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

General equilibrium; Housing demand; Locational equilibrium; Open space; Tiebout sorting

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL DETERMINANT; DATA SETS; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM; HOUSING PRICES; MINNESOTA; OPEN SPACE; PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM; POLICY DESIGN; RESIDENTIAL LOCATIONS; SORTING MODEL; SPATIAL STRUCTURE; TIEBOUT; WELFARE IMPACTS;

FERRY BOATS; SALES;

HOUSING;

DATA SET; HETEROGENEITY; HOUSEHOLD STRUCTURE; HOUSING ASSOCIATION; HOUSING PROVISION; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; OPEN SPACE; PARAMETERIZATION; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WELFARE IMPACT;

MINNESOTA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77955280547     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: 10960449     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2010.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson S.T., West S.E. Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2006, 36:773-789.
2. Banzhaf H.S., Smith V.K. Meta-analysis in model implementation: choice sets and the valuation of air quality improvements. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2007, 22:1013-1031.
3. Bayer P.J., Ferreira F., McMillian R. A unified framework for measuring preferences for schools and neighborhoods. Journal of Political Economy 2007, 115:588-638.
4. Bayer P.J., Keohane N., Timmins C. Migration and hedonic valuation: the case of air quality. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2009, 58:1-14.
5. Bayer P.J., Timmins C. Estimating equilibrium models of sorting across locations. The Economic Journal 2007, 117:353-374.
6. Bayer P.J., Timmins C. On the equilibrium properties of locational sorting models. Journal of Urban Economics 2005, 57:462-477.
7. P.J. Bayer, R. McMillan, K.S. Rueben, An equilibrium model of sorting in an urban housing market, NBER working paper series, no. 10865 (2005).
8. Berry S.T., Linton O., Pakes A. Limit theorems for estimating the parameters of differentiated product demand systems. Review of Economic Studies 2004, 71:613-654.
9. Berry S.T. Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND Journal of Economics 1994, 25(2):242-262.
10. Epple D., Filimon R., Romer T. Existence of voting and housing equilibrium in a system of communities with property taxes. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1993, 23:585-610.
11. Epple D., Sieg H. Estimating equilibrium models of local jurisdictions. Journal of Political Economy 1999, 107(4):645-681.
12. Irwin E.G., Bockstael N. The problem of identifying land use spillovers: measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001, 83(3):698-704.
13. Irwin E.G. The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics 2002, 78(4):465-480.
14. H.A. Klaiber, Valuing open space in a locational equilibrium model of the Twin Cities." Dissertation (2008).
15. H.A. Klaiber, V.K. Smith, Preference heterogeneity and non-market benefits: the roles of structural hedonic and sorting models, in: J. Bennett, (Ed.), The International Yearbook of Non-Market Valuation, Elgar, forthcoming.
16. Kuminoff N.V. Decomposing the structural identification of nonmarket values. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2009, 57:123-139.
17. Kotchen M.J., Powers S. Explaining the appearance and success of voter referenda for open-space conservation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2006, 52:373-390.
18. D. McFadden, Modeling the choice of residential location. in: A. Krlqvist, L. Lundqvist, and F. Snickars, (Eds.), Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models. Amsterdam, North Holland, 1978.
19. T.J. Nechyba, School finance induced migration and stratification patterns: the impact of private school vouchers, Journal of Public Economic Theory (1999).
20. Smith V.K., Poulos C., Kim H. Treating open space as an urban amenity. Resource and Energy Economics 2002, 24:107-129.
21. The Trust for Public Land. Land Vote 2007 (2008).
22. Tiebout C.M., Pure A. Theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 1956, 64:416-424.
23. Tra C. A discrete choice equilibrium approach to valuing large environmental changes. Journal of Public Economics 2010, 94:183-196.
24. Walsh R. Endogeneous open space amenities in a locational equilibrium. Journal of Urban Economics 2007, 61(2):319-344.