Generalized time-invariant overtaking

Journal of Mathematical Economics

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 519-533

  Asheim, Geir B ^a   d'Aspremont, Claude ^b   Banerjee, Kuntal ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

Author keywords

Intergenerational justice; Leximin; Utilitarianism

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955274598     PISSN: 03044068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2010.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Asheim G.B., Tungodden B. Resolving distributional conflicts between generations. Economic Theory 2004, 24:221-230.
2. Atsumi H. Neoclassical growth and the efficient program of capital accumulation. Review of Economic Studies 1965, 32:127-136.
3. Banerjee K. On the extension of the utilitarian and Suppes-Sen social welfare relations to infinite utility streams. Social Choice and Welfare 2006, 27:327-339.
4. Basu K., Mitra T. Utilitarianism for infinite utility streams: a new welfare criterion and its axiomatic characterization. Journal of Economic Theory 2007, 133:350-373.
5. Basu K., Mitra T. Possibility theorems for aggregating infinite utility streams equitably. Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability 2007, 69-84. Palgrave-Macmillan, Basingstoke. J. Roemer, K. Suzumura (Eds.).
6. Bossert W., Weymark J.A. Utility in social choice. Handbook of Utility Theory, Vol. 2. Extensions 2004, 1099-1177. Kluwer, Boston. S. Barbara, P. Hammond, C. Seidl (Eds.).
7. Bossert W., Sprumont Y., Suzumura K. Ordering infinite utility streams. Journal of Economic Theory 2007, 135:579-589.
8. d'Aspremont C. Axioms for social welfare orderings. Social Goals and Social Organizations: Essay in Memory of Elisha Pazner 1985, 19-76. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. L. Hurwicz, D. Schmeidler, H. Sonnenschein (Eds.).
9. d'Aspremont C. Formal welfarism and intergenerational equity. Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability 2007, 113-130. Palgrave-Macmillan, Basingstoke. J. Roemer, K. Suzumura (Eds.).
10. d'Aspremont C., Gevers L. Equity and the informational basis for social choice. Review of Economic Studies 1977, 44:199-208.
11. d'Aspremont C., Gevers L. Social welfare functionals and interpersonal comparibility. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare 2002, vol. 1:459-541. Elsevier, Amsterdam. K. Arrow, A. Sen, K. Suzumura (Eds.).
12. Fleurbaey M., Michel P. Intertemporal equity and the extension of the Ramsey criterion. Journal of Mathematical Economics 2003, 39:777-802.
13. Hammond P.J. Equity, Arrow's condition, and Rawls' difference principle. Econometrica 1976, 44:793-804.
14. Hammond P.J. Equity in two person situations: some consequences. Econometrica 1979, 47:1127-1135.
15. Kamaga K., Kojima T. Q-anonymous social welfare relations on infinite utility streams. Social Choice and Welfare 2009, 33:405-413.
16. Kamaga, K., Kojima, T., 2010. On the leximin and utilitarian overtaking criteria with extended anonymity. Social Choice and Welfare, forthcoming (). doi:10.1007/s00355-010-0445-x.
17. Kolm S.C. Justice et Equite 1972, CNRS, Paris.
18. Koopmans T.C. Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 1960, 28:287-309.
19. Lauwers L. Infinite utility: insisting on strong monotonicity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1997, 75:222-233.
20. Lauwers L. Ordering infinite utility streams comes at the cost of a non-Ramsey set. Journal of Mathematical Economics 2010, 46:32-37.
21. Lauwers L., Vallentyne P. Infinite utilitarianism: more is always better. Economics and Philosophy 2004, 20:307-330.
22. Mabrouk, M., 2008. Comparing incomparable alternatives when certain axioms are to be satisfied. Mimeo, ESSAI, Tunis.
23. Milnor J.W. Games against nature. Decision Processes 1954, 49-60. John Wiley, London. R. Thrall, C. Coombs, R. Davis (Eds.).
24. Mitra, T., 2007. Stationary Paretian social welfare quasi-orderings and intergenerational equity. Mimeo, Cornell University.
25. Mitra T., Basu K. On the existence of paretian social welfare relations for infinite utility streams with extended anonymity. Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability 2007, 85-99. Palgrave-Macmillan, Basingstoke. J. Roemer, K. Suzumura (Eds.).
26. Sakai, T., 2010. Intergenerational equity and an explicit construction of welfare criteria. Social Choice and Welfare, forthcoming (). doi:10.1007/s00355-010-0446-9.
27. Sen A. Collective Choice and Social Welfare 1970, Holden-Day, San Francisco.
28. Sen A. Welfare inequalities and Rawlsian axiomatics. Theory and Decision 1976, 7:243-262.
29. Suppes P. Some formal models of the grading principle. Synthese 1966, 6:284-306.
30. Svensson L.-G. Equity among generations. Econometrica 1980, 48:1251-1256.
31. Vallentyne P., Kegan S. Infinite value and finitely additive value theory. Journal of Philosophy 1997, 94:5-26.
32. von Weizsäcker C.C. Existence of optimal program of accumulation for an infinite time horizon. Review of Economic Studies 1965, 32:85-104.
33. Zame W. Can intergenerational equity be operationalized?. Theoretical Economics 2007, 2:187-202.