Q-anonymous social welfare relations on infinite utility streams

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 405-413

  Kamaga, Kohei ^a   Kojima, Takashi ^a  

^a WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349902973     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-009-0366-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arrow KJ (1963) Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
2. Asheim GB, Tungodden B (2004) Resolving distributional conflicts between generations. Econ Theory 24: 221-230.
3. Asheim GB, Tungodden B (2005) Do Koopmans' postulates lead to discounted utilitarianism? Mimeo, University of Oslo.
4. Asheim GB, Buchholz W, Tungodden B (2001) Justifying sustainability. J Environ Econ Manage 41: 252-268.
5. Banerjee K (2006a) On the extension of the utilitarian and Suppes-Sen social welfare relations to infinite utility streams. Soc Choice Welf 27: 327-339.
6. Banerjee K (2006b) On the equity-efficiency trade off in aggregating infinite utility streams. Econ Lett 93: 63-67.
7. Basu K, Mitra T (2007) Utilitarianism for infinite utility streams: a new welfare criterion and its axiomatic characterization. J Econ Theory 133: 350-373.
8. Blackorby C, Bossert W, Donaldson D (2002) Utilitarianism and the theory of justice. In: Arrow KJ, Sen AK, Suzumura K (eds) Handbook of social choice and welfare, vol I. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
9. Bossert W, Weymark JA (2004) Utility in social choice. In: Barberà S, Hammond P, Seidl C (eds) Handbook of utility theory, extensions, vol 2. Kluwer, Boston.
10. Bossert W, Sprumont Y, Suzumura K (2007) Ordering infinite utility streams. J Econ Theory 135: 579-589.
11. d'Aspremont C (2007) Formal welfarism and intergenerational equity. In: Roemer J, Suzumura K (eds) Intergenerational equity and sustainability. Palgrave, London.
12. d'Aspremont C, Gevers L (2002) Social welfare functionals and interpersonal comparability. In: Arrow KJ, Sen AK, Suzumura K (eds) Handbook of social choice and welfare, vol I. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
13. Dalton H (1920) The measurement of the inequality of incomes. Econ J 30: 348-361.
14. Diamond P (1965) The evaluation of infinite utility streams. Econometrica 33: 170-177.
15. Fleurbaey M, Michel P (2003) Intertemporal equity and the extension of the Ramsey criterion. J Math Econ 39: 777-802.
16. Hammond PJ (1976) Equity, Arrow's conditions, and Rawls' difference principle. Econometrica 44: 793-804.
17. Hara C, Shinotsuka T, Suzumura K, Xu Y (2008) Continuity and egalitarianism in the evaluation of infinite utility streams. Soc Choice Welf 31: 179-191.
18. Lauwers L (1997a) Rawlsian equity and generalised utilitarianism with and infinite population. Econ Theory 9: 143-150.
19. Lauwers L (1997b) Infinite utility: insisting on strong monotonicity. Aust J Philos 75: 222-233.
20. Lauwers L (2006) Ordering infinite utility streams: completeness at the cost of a non-Ramsey set. Mimeo, Katholike Universiteit Leuven.
21. Mitra T, Basu K (2007) On the existence of Paretian social welfare quasi-orderings for infinite utility streams with extended anonymity. In: Roemer J, Suzumura K (eds) Intergenerational equity and sustainability. Palgrave, London.
22. Pigou A (1912) Wealth and welfare. Macmillan, London.
23. Sakai T (2003) An axiomatic approach to intergenerational equity. Soc Choice Welf 20: 167-176.
24. Sakai T (2006) Equitable intergenerational preferences on restricted domains. Soc Choice Welf 27: 41-54.
25. Sen AK (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, Amsterdam.
26. Suppes P (1966) Some formal models of grading principles. Synthese 6: 284-306.
27. Svensson LG (1980) Equity among generations. Econometrica 48: 1251-1256.
28. Szpilrajn E (1930) Sur l'extension de l'ordre partiel. Fundam Math 16: 386-389.
29. van Liedekerke L (1995) Should utilitarians be cautious about an infinite future. Aust J Philos 73: 405-407.
30. Zame W (2007) Can intergenerational equity be operationalized? Theor Econ 2: 187-202.