Schumpeterian competition, technological regimes and learning through knowledge spillover

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 482-493

  Wersching, Klaus ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Agent based simulation; Industry dynamics; Innovation; Knowledge spillover; Technological regimes

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955271027     PISSN: 01672681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2010.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aghion P., Bloom N., Blundell R., Griffith R., Howitt P. Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2005, 120:701-728.
2. Audretsch D.B. New-firm survival and the technological regime. Review of Economics and Statistics 1991, 73:441-450.
3. Blaug M. Is competition such a good thing? Static efficiency versus dynamic efficiency. Review of Industrial Organization 2001, 19:37-48.
4. Boschma R.A. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies 2005, 39:61-74.
5. Breschi S., Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Economic Journal 2000, 110:388-410.
6. Burton R.M. Computational laboratories for organization science: questions, validity and docking. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 2003, 9:91-108.
7. Cohen W. Empirical studies of innovative activity. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change 1995, 182-264. Blackwell, Oxford. P. Stoneman (Ed.).
8. Dawid H. Agent-based models of innovation and technological change. Agent-based Computational Economics 2006, vol. 2:1235-1272. North-Holland. L. Tesfatsion, K. Judd, M.D. Intriligator, K. Arrow (Eds.).
9. Dawid H., Reimann M. Evaluating market attractiveness: individual incentives vs. industrial profitability. Computational Economics 2005, 24:321-355.
10. Dawid, H., Reimann, M., forthcoming. Diversification: a road to inefficiency in product innovations?. Journal of Evolutionary Economics.
11. Dosi G., Marsili O., Orsenigo L., Salvatore R. Learning, market selection and the evolution of industrial structures. Small Business Economics 1995, 7:411-436.
12. Garavaglia C., Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Entry market structure and innovation in a " History-friendly" model of the evolution of the pharmaceutical industry. Knowledge Accumulation and Industry Evolution: The Case of Pharma-Biotech 2006, 234-265. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M. Mazzucato, G. Dosi (Eds.).
13. Hales D., Rouchier J., Edmonds B. Model-to-model analysis. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 2003, 6(4):5.
14. Hamermesh D.S. Viewpoint: replication in economics. Canadian Journal of Economics 2007, 40:715-733.
15. Kamien M.I., Schwartz N.L. Market Structure and Innovation 1982, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Llerena P., Oltra V. Diversity of innovative strategy as a source of technological performance. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 2002, 13:179-201.
17. Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific. Research Policy 1996, 25:451-478.
18. Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Knowledge, innovation activities and industrial evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change 2000, 9:289-313.
19. Marsili O. The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries: Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics 2001, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
20. Marsili O., Verspagen B. Technology and the dynamics of industrial structures: an empirical mapping of Dutch manufacturing. Industrial and Corporate Change 2002, 11:791-815.
21. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change 1982, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. and London.
22. Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 1984, 13:343-373.
23. Pavitt K., Robson M., Townsend J. Technological accumulation, diversification and organisation in UK companies, 1945-1983. Management Science 1989, 35:81-99.
24. Schumpeter J.A. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung 1912, Dunckner & Humblot, Leipzig.
25. Schumpeter J.A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy 1942, Harper and Row, New York.
26. Tesfatsion L. Agent-based computational economics: A constructive approach to economic theory. Agent-based Computational Economics 2006, Vol. 2:831-880. North-Holland. L. Tesfatsion, K. Judd, M.D. Intriligator, K. Arrow (Eds.).
27. Wersching K. Agglomeration in an innovative and differentiated industry with heterogeneous knowledge spillovers. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 2007, 2:1-25.
28. Windrum P., Fagiolo G., Moneta A. Empirical validation of agent-based models: Alternatives and prospects. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 2007, 10(2):8.
29. Winter S.G. Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1984, 5:287-320.
30. Wuyts S., Colombo M.G., Dutta S., Nooteboom B. Empirical tests of optimal cognitive distance. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 2005, 58:277-302.