Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: A pilot study

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 181-193

  Chen, Xiaojun ^a   Yuan, Jianbing ^a   Wang, Chengtao ^a   Huang, Yuanliang ^b   Kang, Lu ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Computer aided surgery; Oral implantology; Preoperative planning; Stereolithographic template

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION TREE; DENTAL CARE; EDENTULOUSNESS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; ORAL SURGERY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PILOT STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DECISION TREES; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS; ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES, PREPROSTHETIC; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PILOT PROJECTS; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77955238862     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00160.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Askary AS, Meffert RM, Griffin T. Why do dental implants fail? Part I. Implant Dent 1999, 8:173-185.
2. Askary AS, Meffert RM, Griffin T. Why do dental implants fail? Part II. Implant Dent 1999, 8:265-277.
3. Lal K, White GS, Morea DN, Wright RF. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept. J Prosthodont 2006, 15:51-58.
4. Lal K, White GS, Morea DN, Wright RF. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part II. A clinical report. J Prosthodont 2006, 15:117-122.
5. Reddy MS, Mayfield DT, Vanderven FJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994, 5:229-238.
6. Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E. Computer-assisted implant placement. A case report: treatment of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003, 18:599-604.
7. Ganz SD. Presurgical planning with CT-derived fabrication of surgical guides. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005, 63:59-71.
8. Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer tomography, CAD/CAM technology, and the Internet for immediate loading of dental implants. J Esthetic Restor Dent 2006, 18:312-325.
9. Kupeyan HK, Shaffner M, Armstrong J. Definitive CAD/CAM-guided prosthesis for immediate loading of bone-grafted maxilla: a case report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006, 8:161-167.
10. Mischkowski RA, Zinser MJ, Neugebauer J, Kubler AC, Zoller JE. Comparison of static and dynamic computer-assisted guidance methods in implantology. Int J Comput Dent 2006, 9:23-35.
11. Jabero M, Sarment DP. Advanced surgical guidance technology: a review. Implant Dent 2006, 15:135-142.
12. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003, 18:571-577.
13. Sammartino G, Della Valle A, Marenzi G. Stereolithography in oral implantology: a comparison of surgical guides. Implant Dent 2004, 13:133-139.
14. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, De Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol 2005, 76:503-507.
15. Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Watzinger F. Evaluation of accuracy of computer-aided intraoperative positioning of endosseous oral implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002, 13:59-64.
16. Wagner A, Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W. Computer-aided placement of endosseous oral implants in patients after ablative tumour surgery: assessment of accuracy. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003, 14:340-348.
17. Brief J, Hassfeld S, Sonnenfeld U. Computer-guided insertion of dental implants-a clinical evaluation. Int Congr Ser 2001, 1230:739-747.
18. Meyer U, Wiesmann HP, Runte C. Evaluation of accuracy of insertion of dental implants and prosthetic treatment by computer-aided navigation in minipigs. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003, 41:102-108.
19. Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, Eggers G. Accuracy of image-guided implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005, 16:495-501.
20. Randelzhofer P, De la Barrera JM, Spielberg M, Kurtz C, Strub JR. Three-dimensional navigation in oral implantology: a preliminary investigation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001, 21:617-626.
21. Valente AF, Sbrenna BA, Buoni CC. CAD CAM drilling guides for transferring CT-based digital planning to flapless placement of oral implants in complex cases. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2006, 1:413-414.
22. Kreissl ME, Heydecke G, Metzger MC, Schoen R. Zygoma implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after partial maxillectomy using surgical navigation: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2007, 97:121-128.
23. Lorensen WE, Cline HE. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. ACM Comput Graph 1987, 21:38-44.
24. Schroeder WJ, Zarge JA, Lorensen WE. Decimation of triangle meshes. Proc ACMM Siggraph 1992, 26:65-70.
25. Schroeder W, Martin K, Lorensen B. The Visualization Toolkit: an object-oriented approach to 3D graphics 1997, New Jersey, Prentice Hall
26. Lancaster JL, Eberly D, Alyassin A, Hunter DJ, Fox PT. A geometric model for measurement of surface distance, surface area, and volume from tomographic images. Med Phys 1992, 19:419-431.
27. Hughes SW, D'Arcy TJ, Maxwell DJ. Application of a new discreet form of Gauss' theorem for measuring volume. Phys Med Biol 1996, 41:1809-1821.
28. Schutyser F, Swennen G, Suetens P. Robust visualization of the dental occlusion by a double scan procedure. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2005, 8:368-374.
29. Roy A, Govil S, Miranda R. An algorithm to generate radial basis function (RBF)-like nets for classification problems. Neural Netw 1995, 8:179-201.
30. Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD. Least-squares fitting of two 3-D point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1987, 9:698-700.
31. Besl PJ, Mckay ND. A method for Registration of 3D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1992, 14:239-256.
32. Chivate PN, Puntambekar NV, Jablokow AG. Extending surfaces for reverse engineering solid model generation. Comput Ind 1999, 38:285-294.
33. Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007, 34:816-821.