The U.S. proposed carbon tariffs, WTO scrutiny and China's responses

International Economics and Economic Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 203-225

  Zhang, ZhongXiang ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a EAST WEST CENTER   (United States)

^b FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Chinese Academy of Sciences   (China)

^d PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e CHINESE ACADEMY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Border carbon adjustments; Cap and trade regime; Carbon tariffs; China; Emissions allowance requirements; Kyoto protocol; Lieberman Warner bill; Post 2012 climate negotiations; United States; Waxman Markey bill; World trade organization

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955232572     PISSN: 16124804     EISSN: 16124812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10368-010-0166-8     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Berger JR (1999) Unilateral trade measures to conserve the world's living resources: an environmental breakthrough for the GATT in the WTO sea turtle case. Columbia J Environ Law 24: 355-411.
2. Bhagwati J, Mavroidis PC (2007) Is action against US exports for failure to sign Kyoto Protocol WTO-legal? World Trade Rev 6(2): 299-310.
3. Bounds A (2006) EU trade chief to reject 'Green' tax plan. Financial Times, December 17, Available at: http://www. ft. com/cms/s/0/9dc90f34-8def-11db-ae0e-0000779e2340. html?nclick_check=1.
4. Bovenberg AL, Goulder LH (2002) Addressing industry-distributional concerns in U. S. climate change policy. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, Stanford University.
5. Broder J (2009) Obama opposes trade sanctions in climate bill. New York Times, June 28, Available at: http://www. nytimes. com/2009/06/29/us/politics/29climate. html?_r=2& scp=1& sq=obama%20opposes%20trade%20sanctions& st=cse.
6. Charnovitz S (2003) Trade and climate: potential conflicts and synergies, in Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Beyond Kyoto-advancing the international effort against climate change, pp 141-170.
7. Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations (UNDESA) (2009) World population prospects: the 2008 revision. Available at: http://esa. un. org/unpp.
8. Doyle A (2009) U. S. praises China's climate efforts. Urges More, Reuters, Available at: http://www. reuters. com/article/environmentNews/idUSTRE52S1WP20090329.
9. Dröge S et al (2009) Tackling leakage in a world of unequal carbon prices. Synthesis Report, Climate Strategies, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
10. EIA (2004) International Energy Outlook 2004. U. S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Washington, DC.
11. European Commission (2008) Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading system of the community, COM(2008) 16 final, Brussels.
12. Genasci M (2008) Border tax adjustments and emissions trading: the implications of international trade law for policy design. Carbon and Climate Law Review 2(1): 33-42.
13. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (1987) United States-taxes on petroleum and certain imported substances. Report of the Panel, Adopted on June 17, L/6175, BISD 34S/136, Geneva, Available at: http://www. wto. org/english/res_e/booksp_e/analytic_index_e/introduction_01_e. htm.
14. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (1990) Thailand-restrictions on importation of and internal taxes on cigarettes. Report of the Panel, DS10/R, Adopted on November 7, BISD 37S/200, Geneva, Available at: http://www. wto. org/english/res_e/booksp_e/analytic_index_e/introduction_01_e. htm.
15. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (1994) United States: restrictions on the imports of tuna. Report of the Panel (not adopted), DS29/R, June 16, Geneva, Available at: http://www. wto. org/english/res_e/booksp_e/analytic_index_e/introduction_01_e. htm.
16. Haverkamp J (2008) International aspects of a climate change cap and trade program. Testimony before the Committee on Finance, U. S. Senate, February 14, Available at: http://finance. senate. gov/hearings/testimony/2008test/021408jhtest. pdf.
17. Hollinger P (2009) Sarkozy renews carbon tax call. Financial Times, September 11, p. 5.
18. Houser T, Bradley R, Childs B, Werksman J, Heilmayr R (2008) Leveling the carbon playing field: international competition and U. S. climate policy design. Peterson Institute For International Economics and World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
19. IEA (2007) World Energy Outlook 2007. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.
20. IEA (2009) World Energy Outlook 2009. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.
21. Ismer R, Neuhoff K (2007) Border tax adjustment: a feasible way to support stringent emission trading. Eur J Law Econ 24(2): 137-164.
22. McBroom M (2008) How the IBEW-UWM-Boilermakers-AEP International Proposal Operates within Climate Legislation, June 17, Available at: http://www. wita. org/index. php?tg=fileman& idx=viewfile& idf=189& id=4& gr=Y& path=& file=WITA-+Climate+Change+-+Overview+of+IBEW-AEP+Proposal+(June+17%2C+2008). pdf.
23. Ministry of Commerce of China (MOC of China) (2009) A statement on "Carbon Tariffs". July 3, Beijing, Available at: http://www. mofcom. gov. cn/aarticle/ae/ag/200907/20090706375686. html, (in Chinese).
24. Morris MG, Hill ED (2007) Trade is the key to climate change. Energy Dly 35(33), February 20, Available at: http://www. theenergydaily. com/articles/ed/2007/ed02200703. html.
25. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2008) China Statistical Yearbook 2008. China Statistics Press, Beijing.
26. Parry IWH, Williams RC III, Goulder LH (1999) When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets. J Environ Econ Manage 37(1): 52-84.
27. Reinaud J (2008) Issues behind competitiveness and carbon leakage: focus on heavy industry. IEA Information Paper, IEA/OECD, October, Paris.
28. Reuters (2009) China says "Carbon Tariffs" proposals breach WTO rules. New York Times, July 3, Available at: http://www. nytimes. com/reuters/2009/07/03/world/international-uk-china-climate. html?ref=global-home.
29. Samuelsohn D (2007) Trade plan opposed by China, Brazil and Mexico. Greenwire, September 26, Available at: http://www. earthportal. org/news/?p=507.
30. Swedish National Board of Trade (2004) Climate and trade rule-harmony or conflict? Stockholm.
31. Talley I (2009) Senate to put off climate bill until spring. Wall Street Journal, November 18, Available at: http://online. wsj. com/article/SB125850693443052993. html.
32. The Economist (2008) Pollution law: trading dirt, June 7, pp. 42-44.
33. The World Bank (2007) International trade and climate change: economic, legal and institutional perspectives. Washington DC.
34. Wang X, Voituriez T (2009) Can unilateral trade measures significantly reduce leakage and competitiveness pressures on EU-ETS-constrained industries? The Case of China Export Taxes and VAT Rebates, Working Paper, Climate Strategies, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
35. Werksman J, Houser T (2008) Competitiveness, leakage and comparability: disciplining the use of trade measures under a post-2012 climate agreement. Discussion Paper, World Resources Institute, December, Washington, DC.
36. World Trade Organization (WTO) (1998) United States-import prohibition of certain shrimp and shrimp products. Report of the Appellate Body, WT/DS58/AB/R, Geneva.
37. World Trade Organization (WTO) (2001) United States-import prohibition of certain shrimp and shrimp products. Recourse to Article 21. 5 of the DSU by Malaysia, Panel Report, WT/DS58/RW, Adopted on November 21, Geneva.
38. World Trade Organization (WTO) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2009) Trade and climate change: WTO-UNEP Report. Geneva.
39. Zhang ZX (1997) The economics of energy policy in China: implications for global climate change. New Horizons in Environmental Economics Series, Edward Elgar.
40. Zhang ZX (1998) Greenhouse gas emissions trading and the world trading system. J World Trade 32(5): 219-239.
41. Zhang ZX (1999) Should the rules of allocating emissions permits be harmonised? Ecol Econ 31(1): 11-18.
42. Zhang ZX (2000) Can China afford to commit itself an emissions cap? An economic and political analysis. Energy Econ 22(6): 587-614.
43. Zhang ZX (2003) Why did the energy intensity fall in China's industrial sector in the 1990s? The relative importance of structural change and intensity change. Energy Econ 25(6): 625-638.
44. Zhang ZX (2004) Open trade with the U. S. without compromising Canada's ability to comply with its Kyoto target. J World Trade 38(1): 155-182.
45. Zhang ZX (2007a) Doing trade and climate policy together. In: Najam A, Halle M, Meléndez-Ortiz R (eds) Trade and environment: a resource book. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Canada, and International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva.
46. Zhang ZX (2007b) Why has China not embraced a global cap-and-trade regime? Climate Policy 7(2): 166-170.
47. Zhang ZX (2008) Asian energy and environmental policy: promoting growth while preserving the environment. Energy Policy 36: 3905-3924.
48. Zhang ZX (2009a) Multilateral trade measures in a post-2012 climate change regime? What can be taken from the Montreal Protocol and the WTO? Energy Policy 37: 5105-5112.
49. Zhang ZX (2009b) How should China respond to the U. S. proposed carbon tariffs? International Petroleum Economics 17(8): 13-16.
50. Zhang ZX (2009c) Is China a Christmas tree to hang everybody's complaints? Putting its own energy-saving into perspective. Energy Econ. doi: 10. 1016/j. eneco. 2009. 03. 012. 0, forthcoming.
51. Zhang ZX (2010) Copenhagen and beyond: reflections on China's stance and responses. In: Cerdá E, Labandeira X (eds) Climate change policies: global challenges and future prospects. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, United Kingdom and Northampton, United States, pp. 217-231.
52. Zhang ZX, Assunção L (2004) Domestic climate policy and the WTO. World Econ 27(3): 359-386.