Open trade with the United States without compromising Canada's ability to comply with its Kyoto target

Journal of World Trade

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 155-182

  Zhang, Zhong Xiang ^a,b,c  

^a EAST WEST CENTER   (United States)

^b CHINESE ACADEMY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES   (China)

^c PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149095823     PISSN: 10116702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.54648/trad2004007     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ahn, D. (1999), Environmental Disputes in the GATT/WTO: Before and after the US-Shrimp Case, 20 Michigan Journal of International Law, pp. 819-870.
2. AMG (1999), Canada's Emissions Outlook: An Update, Analysis and Modelling Group (AMG), National Climate Change Process, Government of Canada, December, available at .
3. Babiker, M.H., H.D. Jacoby, J.M. Reilly and D.M. Reiner (2002), The Evolution of a Climate Regime: Kyoto to Marrakech and Beyond, 5 Environmental Science & Policy 3, pp. 195-206.
4. Baumol, W.J. and W.E. Oates (1988), The Theory of Environmental Policy (2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
5. Berger, J.R. (1999), Unilateral Trade Measures to Conserve the World's Living Resources: An Environmental Breakthrough for the GATT in the WTO Sea Turtle Case, 24 Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, pp. 355-411.
6. Bodansky, D. (2002), Linking US and International Climate Change Strategies, (Arlington: Pew Center on Global Climate Change).
7. Bovenberg, A.L. and L.H. Goulder (2002), Addressing Industry-Distributional Concerns in US Climate Change Policy, unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, Stanford University.
8. Brack, D., M. Grubb and C. Windram (1999), International Trade and Climate Change Policies (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs and Earthscan).
9. Buck, M. and R. Verheyen (2001), International Trade Law and Climate Change - A Positive Way Forward (Bonn: Stabsabteilung der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung).
10. Cosbey, A. and J. Cameron (1999), Trade Implications of the Kyoto Protocol (Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development).
11. Cramton, P. and S. Kerr (2002), Tradeable Carbon Allowance Auctions: How and Why to Auction not Grandfather, 30 Energy Policy 4, pp. 333-345.
12. DEFRA (2001), A Summary Guide to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (London: UK Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs).
13. DOE (2001), International Energy Outlook (Washington, D.C.: Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy (DOE)).
14. DOE (2003a), Country Analysis Brief - Canada (Washington, D.C.: Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy (DOE), July), available at .
15. DOE (2003b), Country Analysis Brief - United States of America (Washington, D.C.: Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy (DOE), October), available at .
16. ELI (1997), Implementing an Emissions Cap and Allowance Trading System for Greenhouse Gases: Lessons from the Acid Rain Program (Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute (ELI)).
17. Ellerman, A.D., R. Schmalensee, P.L. Joskow, J.P. Montero and E.M. Bailey (1997), Emissions Trading under the US Acid Rain Program: Evaluation of Compliance Costs and Allowance Market Performance (Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
18. European Union (1999), Community Strategy on Climate Change: Council Conclusions, No. 8346/99, Brussels, 18 May.
19. European Union (2001), Trade and the Environment: Support Sustainable Development, available at .
20. Fauteux, P. (2002), Party/Non-Party Emissions Trading: Compatibility Now, Convergence Later?, Notes Presented at IETA Side Event on Convergence of GHG Regimes and Linking Trading Schemes, Bonn, 10 June.
21. Friends of the Earth Europe (2002), "EU Should Target US Genetically Modified Food and Energy Intensive Products in Trade Dispute", press release on 16 September, available at .
22. GATT (1991), United States - Restrictions on Imports of Tuna, Report of the Panel DS21/R, 3 September (Geneva: General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)).
23. GATT (1994), United States - Restrictions on Imports of Tuna, Report of the Panel DS29/R, 16 June (Geneva: General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)).
24. Government of Canada (2002a), A Discussion Paper on Canada's Contribution to Addressing Climate Change, available at .
25. Government of Canada (2002b), Climate Change Plan for Canada, November, available at .
26. Hausker, K. (1992), The Politics and Economics of Auction Design in the Market for Sulfur Dioxide Pollution, 11 Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, pp. 553-572.
27. Hoerner, J.A. (1998), The Role of Border Tax Adjustments in Environmental Taxation: Theory and US Experience, presented at the International Workshop on Market-based Instruments and International Trade, Amsterdam, 19-20 March.
28. Horner, C.C. (2002), Kyoto at the WTO, National Post, 11 October.
29. Hudec, R.E. (1996), "GATT Legal Restraints on the Use of Trade Measures against Foreign Environmental Practices", in J. Bhagwati and R.E. Hudec (eds), Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade?, Volume 2: Legal Analysis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 95-174.
30. IISD (2002), Summary of the Sixteenth Sessions of Subsidiary Bodies to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, 5-14 June, 12 Earth Negotiation Bulletin 200 (Winnipeg: International Institute of Sustainable Development (IISD)).
31. IPCC (2001), Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
32. Jackson, J.H. (2000), Comments on Shrimp/Turtle and the Production/ Process Distinction, 11 European Journal of International Law 2, pp. 303-307.
33. Legge, T. (2001), The Unexpected Triumph of Optimism over Experience, CEPS Commentary (Brussels: Center for European Policy Studies (CEPS)).
34. Löschel, A. and Z.X. Zhang (2002), The Economic and Environmental Implications of the US Repudiation of the Kyoto Protocol and the Subsequent Deals in Bonn and Marrakesh, 138 Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv - Review of World Economics 4, pp. 711-746.
35. 2 Emissions", in Z.X. Zhang (guest editor), Special Issue on An Economic Analysis of Climate Policy: Essays in Honour of Andries Nentjes, 32 Energy Policy 4, pp. 447-454.
36. Milliman, S.R. and R. Prince (1989), Firm Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control, 17 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, pp. 247-265.
37. Morici, P. (2002), Reconciling Trade and the Environment in the WTO (Washington, D.C.: Economic Strategy Institute).
38. Nemry, F. (2001), LULUCF39 v4 - Quantitative Implications of the Decision -/CP.7 on LULUCF, personal communication.
39. OECD (1997), Process and Production Methods (PPMs): Conceptual Framework and Considerations on Use of PPMs-based Trade Measures, OECD/GD(97)137 (Paris: OECD).
40. Parry, I.W., R.C. Williams III and L.H. Goulder (1999), When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor Markets, 37 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, pp. 52-84.
41. Poterba, J.M. and J.J. Rotemberg (1995), Environmental Taxes on Intermediate and Final Goods When Both Can Be Imported, 2 International Tax and Public Finance, pp. 221-228.
42. 2 Allowance Trading, 12 Journal of Economic Perspective, pp. 69-88.
43. Stewardson, R. (1994), "The Case of Carbon Taxes", in OECD (ed.), Trade and Environment: Process and Production Methods (Paris: OECD), pp. 93-108.
44. The Economist (2003), The International Criminal Court: Soon It Will Be Dispensing Justice, 15 March.
45. Tietenberg, T., M. Grubb, A. Michaelowa, B. Swift and Z.X. Zhang (1999), International Rules for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading: Defining the Principles, Modalities, Rules and Guidelines for Verification, Reporting and Accountability, UNCTAD/GDS/GFSB/Misc.6 (New York and Geneva: United Nations).
46. UNFCCC (2001), Review of the Implementation of Commitments and of other Provisions of the Convention. Preparations for the First Session of the Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (Decision 8/CP.4): Decision 5/CP.6, Implementation of the Buenos Aires Plan of Action, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/CP/2001/L.7 (Bonn: UNFCCC).
47. UNFCCC (2002a), Proposal on Cleaner or Less Greenhouse Gas-Emitting Energy: Submission from a Party, FCCC/SBSTA/2002/MISC.3/Add.1 (Bonn: UNFCCC, 5 June).
48. UNFCCC (2002b), Proposal on Cleaner Or Less Greenhouse Gas-Emitting Energy - Report on the UNFCCC Workshop on Cleaner or Less Greenhouse Gas-Emitting Energy: Exchange of Information and Views, Whistler, Canada, 7-8 May, FCCC/SBSTA/2002/INF.8 (Bonn: UNFCCC, 3 June).
49. USCIB (2002), WTO Rules and Procedures and Their Implication for the Kyoto Protocol, A Background Paper (Washington, D.C.: United States Council for International Business), available at .
50. Vaughan, S. (1997), Tradeable Emissions Permits and the WTO, presented at the European Union Advanced Study Course on Goals and Instruments for the Achievement of Global Warming Mitigation in Europe, Berlin, 20-26 July.
51. White House (2002), US Climate Strategy: A New Approach, Policy Briefing Book (Washington, D.C.: 14 February).
52. WTO (1998), The Report of the Appellate Body: United States - Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, WT/DS58/AB/R (Geneva: World Trade Organization).
53. Zhang, Z.X. (1997), The Economics of Energy Policy in China: Implications for Global Climate Change, New Horizons in Environmental Economics Series (Cheltenham, England and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar).
54. Zhang, Z.X. (1998), Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading and the World Trading System, 32 J.W.T. 5, pp. 219-239.
55. Zhang, Z.X. (1999), Should the Rules of Allocating Emissions Permits be Harmonised?, 31 Ecological Economics 1, pp. 11-18.