Functional versus spontaneous roles during CSCL

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years - Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005, CSCL 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 647-656

  Strijbos, Jan Willem ^a,c   De Laat, Maarten ^b   Martens, Rob ^a   Jochems, Wim ^c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Computer mediated communication; Coordination; Roles; Triangulation

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; EFFICIENCY; ELECTRONIC MAIL; SURVEYS; TRIANGULATION;

COLLABORATION; COLLABORATIVE PROCESS; COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COORDINATION; EMAIL COMMUNICATION; PROJECT-BASED COURSE; ROLES;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 77955231199     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1149293.1149378     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Baker, M. J. (2002). Forms of cooperation in dyadic problem-solving. Revue d-Intelligence Artificielle, 16, 587-620.
2. Benbunan-Fich, R., & Hiltz, S. R. (1999). Impacts of asynchronous learning networks on individual and group problem solving: A field experiment. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 409-426.
3. Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 4, 109-126.
4. De Laat, M., & Lally, V. (2003). Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science, 31, 7-39.
5. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by 'collaborative learning-? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-16). Amsterdam: Pergamon, Elsevier Science.
6. Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
7. Hare, A. P. (1994). Types of roles in small groups: A bit of history and a current perspective. Small Group Research, 25, 443-448.
8. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Johnson-Holubec, E. (1992). Advanced cooperative learning. Edina: Interaction Book Company.
9. Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
10. Kynigos, C. (1999). Perspectives in analysing classroom interaction data on collaborative computer-based mathematical projects. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL) 1999 (pp. 333-340). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
11. Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. (Pubitemid 8054849)
12. Lipponen, L. (2001). Computer-supported collaborative learning: From promises to reality. Doctoral dissertation, series B, Humaniora, 245. Turku: University of Turku.
13. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
14. Mudrack, P. E., & Farrell, G. M. (1995). An examination of functional role behaviour and its consequences for individuals in group settings. Small Group Research, 26, 542-571. (Pubitemid 126140100)
15. O-Donnell, A. M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120-144). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Pata, K., & Sarapuu, T. (2003). Framework for scaffolding the development of problem based representations by collaborative design. In P. Dillenbourg (Series Ed.) & B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Vol. Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning: Vol 2. Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 189-198). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behaviour (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Stahl, G. (2004). Building collaborative knowing: Elements of a social theory of CSCL. In P. Dillenbourg (Series Ed.) & J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner & R. L. Martens (Vol. Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning: Vol 3. What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 53-85). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D., & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265.
20. Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P. A., & Martens, R. L. (Eds.). (2004a). What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2004b). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers & Education, 42, 403-424.
22. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2004c). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 195-229. (Pubitemid 38397542)
23. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (in press-a). The effect of functional roles on perceived group efficiency during computer-supported collaborative learning: A matter of triangulation. Computers in Human Behavior.
24. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (in press-b). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education.
25. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning: Effects of social and epistemic collaboration scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ludwigs-Maximilians- Universität, München, Germany.