Congressional ideology and administrative oversight in the New Deal era

Historical Methods

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 125-137

  Bertelli, Anthony Micheal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

administrative procedures; Bayesian measurement model; New Deal; U.S. Congress; Walter Logan Act

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; IDEOLOGY; MODELING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 77955193266     PISSN: 01615440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01615441003667491     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Brady, D., K. Buckley, and D. Rivers. 1999. The roots of careerism in the U.S. House ofRepresentatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24:489-510.
2. Brazier, J. 1993. Who controls the administrative state? Congress and the president adopt the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3. Brooks, S. P., andA.Gelman. 1998. Alternative methods formonitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 7:434-455
4. Carrubba, C. J., M. Gabel, L. Murrah, R. Clough, E. Montgomery, and R. Schambach. 2006. On the record: Unrecorded legislative votes, selection bias, and roll-call vote analysis. British Journal of Political Science 36:691-704.
5. Clinton, J., S. Jackman, and D. Rivers. 2004. The statistical analysis of roll-call data. American Political Science Review 98:355-370
6. Cooper, J. 2001. The twentieth-century Congress. In Congress reconsidered. 7th ed., ed. L. C. Dodd and B. I. Oppenheimer, 363-94.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
7. Cooper, J, and G. Young. 2004. Party voting dataset. Johns Hopkins University. http://jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu/?jcooper/papers.html
8. Cox, G. W., and M. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative leviathan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Davis, K. C., and W. Gellhorn. 1986. Present at the creation: Regulatory reform before 1946. Administrative Law Review 38:511-533
10. Enelow, J., and M. Hinich. 1984. The spatial model of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Fleck, R. K. 1999. Electoral, incentives, public policy, and the New Deal realignment. Southern Economic Journal 65:377-404.
12. -. 2002. Democratic opposition to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Journal of Economic History 62:25-54.
13. Gailmard, S. 2002. Expertise, subversion, and bureaucratic discretion. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 18:536-555
14. Gellhorn, W. 1986. The Administrative Procedure Act: The beginnings. Virginia Law Review 72:219-234
15. Groseclose, T. 1996. An examination of the market for favors and votes in Congress. Economic Inquiry 34:320-340
16. Hawley, E.W. 1989. The New Deal state and the anti-bureaucratic tradition. In The New Deal and its legacy: Critique and reappraisal, ed. Robert Eden, 77-92. New York: Greenwood.
17. Horwitz, M. J. 1992. The transformation of American law, 1870-1960: The crisis of legal orthodoxy. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Jackman, S. 2000. Multidimensional analysis of roll call data via Bayesian simulation: Identification, inference, and model checking. Political Analysis 9:227-241
19. -. 2004. Bayesian analysis for political research. Annual Review of Political Science 7:483-505.
20. Jaffe, L. 1942. The reform of federal administrative procedure. Public Administration Review 2:141-158
21. -. 1949. The judicial universe of Mr. Justice Frankfurter. Harvard Law Review 62:357-412.
22. Jenkins, J. 1998. Property rights and the emergence of standing committee dominance in the nineteenth-century House. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23:493-519.
23. Jenkins, J., E. Schickler, and J. Carson. 2004. Constituency cleavages and congressional parties: Homogeneity and polarization, 1857-1913. Social Science History 28 (4): 537-573
24. Karl, B. D. 1963. Executive reorganization and reform in the New Deal: The genesis of administrative management, 1900-1939. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Key, V. O. 1984. Southern politics in state and nation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
26. Krehbiel, K. 1998. Pivotal politics: A theory of U.S. lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Madonna,A. J. 2009. Tracking coalition sizes through congressional history. Working paper, Department of Political Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
28. Martin, A. D., and K. M. Quinn. 2002. Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999. Political Analysis 10:134-153
29. McNollgast. 1999. The political origins of the Administrative Procedure Act. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15:180-217.
30. Nokken, T. P., and K. T. Poole. 2004. Congressional party defection in American history. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29:545-568
31. Patterson, J. T. 2001. The rise of rights and rights consciousness in American politics: 1930s-1970s. In Contesting democracy: Substance and structure in American political history, 1775-2000, ed. Byron E. Shafer and Anthony J. Badger, 201-223 Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
32. Polenberg, R. 1966. Reorganizing Roosevelt's government: The controversy over executive reorganization, 1936-1939. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Poole, K. T. 1998. Recovering a basic space from a set of issue scales. American Journal of Political Science 42:964-993
34. Poole, K. T., and H. Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Pound, R. 1940. Administrative law: Its growth, procedures, and significance. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
36. Roberts, J. 2007. The statistical analysis of roll-call data: A cautionary tale. Legislative Studies Quarterly 32:341-360
37. Rohde, D. 1991. Parties and leaders in the postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Rosenbloom, D. H. 2000. Building a legislative-centered public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
39. Schickler, E. 2001. Disjointed pluralism: Institutional innovation and the development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40. Shepherd, G. 1996. Fierce compromise: The administrative procedure act emerges from New Deal politics. Northwestern University Law Review 90:1557-1683.
41. Smith, S. S. 2007. Party influence in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Strauss, P. L. 1996. From expertise to politics: The transformation of American rulemaking. Wake Forest Law Review 31:745-778
43. Swift, E., and D. Bradley. 1994. Common ground: History and theories of American politics. In The dynamics of American politics, ed. L. C. Dodd and C. Jilson, 83-104. Boulder, CO: Westview.
44. Van Riper, P. P. 1958. History of the United States Civil Service. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
45. Volden, C. 2002. A formal model of the politics of delegation in a separation of powers system. American Journal of Political Science 46:111-133
46. West,W. F. 1985. Administrative rulemaking: Politics and processes.Westport, CT: Greenwood.
47. White, H, 1980.Aheteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48:817-838
48. White, L. D. 1936. The meaning of principles in public administration. In The frontiers of public administration, ed. John M. Gaus, Leonard D. White, and Marshall E. Dimock, 1-12. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.