A comparison of the chronic effects of human pharmaceuticals on two cladocerans, Daphnia magna and Ceriodaphnia dubia

Chemosphere

Volumn 80, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1069-1074

  Constantine, L A ^a   Huggett, D B ^b  

^a PFIZER GLOBAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

C. dubia; D. magna; Environment; Pharmaceuticals; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

CELL PROLIFERATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DRUG PRODUCTS; EFFLUENTS; LIFE CYCLE; METABOLITES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENTS; D. MAGNA; DUBIA; ENVIRONMENT; NO EFFECT CONCENTRATION; NO-OBSERVED-EFFECT-CONCENTRATIONS; PREDICTED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCENTRATIONS; REGULATORY GUIDELINES;

SURFACE WATERS;

3,5 BIS TRIFLUOROMETHYLBENZOLIC ACID; 6 TRIFLUOROMETHYL; CELECOXIB; COMPOUND A; DRUG METABOLITE; LINEZOLID; QUINALDIC ACID; SUNITINIB; SURFACE WATER; TORCETRAPIB; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VARENICLINE; ZIPRASIDONE;

ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCE; BIOMARKER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRUSTACEAN; DRUG; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; LIFE CYCLE; POLLUTION EFFECT; REPRODUCTIVE PRODUCTIVITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL; TOXICITY TEST; WASTEWATER; WATER QUALITY;

ARTICLE; CERIODAPHNIA DUBIA; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CRUSTACEA; DAPHNIA; DRUG INDUSTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; LIFE CYCLE; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REPRODUCTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL RATE; WASTE WATER;

CERIODAPHNIA DUBIA; DAPHNIA MAGNA; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 77955175560     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Brooks B.W., Chambliss C.K., Stanley J.K., Ramirez A., Banks K.E., Johnson R.D., Lewis R.J. Determination of select antidepressants in fish from an effluent-dominated stream. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24(2):464-469.
2. Carlsson C., Johansson A.-K., Alvan G., Bergman K., Kühler T. Are pharmaceuticals potent environmental pollutants? Part I: environmental risk assessments of selected active pharmaceutical ingredients. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 364(1-3):67-87.
3. Daughton C.G., Ternes T.A. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: agents of subtle change?. Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107(6):907-938.
4. Duquesne S., Reynaldi S., Liess M. Effects of the organophosphate paraoxon-methyl on survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna: importance of exposure duration and recovery. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2006, 25(5):1196-1199.
5. EMEA, 2006. Guideline on the Environmental Risk Assessment of Medicinal Products for Human Use. EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4447/00, London.
6. FDA, 1998. Guidance for Industry for the Submission of an Environmental Assessment in Human Drug Applications and Supplements. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER).
7. Ferrari B., Mons R., Vollat B., Fraysse B., Paxéus N., et al. Environmental risk assessment of six human pharmaceuticals: are the current environmental risk assessment procedures sufficient for the protection of the aquatic environment?. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23:1344-1354.
8. Gunnarsson L., Jauhiainen A., Kristiansson E., Nerman O., Larsson J. Evolutionary conservation of human drug targets in organisms used for environmental risk assessments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:5807-5813.
9. Kolpin D.W., Furlong E.T., Meyer M.T., Thurman E.M., Zaugg S.D., Barber L.B., Buxton H.T. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams, 1999-2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:1202-1211.
10. Kwon J.W., Armbrust K.L., Vidal-Dorsch D., Bay S.M. Determination of 17alpha-ethynylestradiol, carbamazepine, diazepam, simvastatin, and oxybenzone in fish livers. J. AOAC Int. 2009, 92:359-369.
11. OECD, 1998. Guideline for Testing of Chemicals. D. magna Reproduction Test. Guideline #211. Adopted 21 September 1998.
12. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. Biometry 1981, W.H. Freeman and Co., New York. second ed.
13. Stewart A.J., Konetsky B.K. Longevity and reproduction of Ceriodaphnia dubia in receiving waters. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1998, 17:1165-1171.
14. US EPA Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluent and Receiving Waters of Freshwater Organisms. EPA-600/4-91-002 US 1994, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
15. Versteeg D.J., Stalmans M., Dyer S.D., Janssen C. Ceriodaphnia and Daphnia: a comparison of their sensitivity to xenobiotics and utility as a test species. Chemosphere 1997, 34:869-892.
16. Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms 1989, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, (EPA/600/4/89/001). second ed. C.I. Weber, W.H. Peltier, T.J. Norberg-King, W.B. Horning, F.A. Kessler, J.R. Menkedick, T.W. Neiheisel, P.A. Lewis, D.J. Klemm, Q.H. Pickering, E.L. Robinson, J.M. Lazorchak, L.J. Wymer, R.W. Freyberg (Eds.).
17. West, Inc. and Gulley, D.D., 1996. TOXSTAT®, Release 3.5. West, Inc., Cheyenne, Wyoming.