A SPH depth integrated model for Popocatépetl 2001 lahar (Mexico): Sensitivity analysis and runout simulation

Engineering Geology

Volumn 114, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 312-329

  Haddad, B ^a   Pastor, M ^b   Palacios, D ^c   Munoz Salinas E ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^b Centro de Estudios y Experimentacion de Obras Publicas   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Flow velocity; Fluidised geomaterial; Lahar; Numerical modelling; Popocat petl volcano; Smoothed particle hydrodynamics

Indexed keywords

BINGHAM FLUID; DEBRIS FLOWS; DECISION MAKERS; FLOW BEHAVIORS; GEOMATERIALS; HAZARD MAP; HAZARD PREVENTION; HEAVY RAINFALL; HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATIONS; INTEGRATED MODELS; LAHAR; ME-XICO; MESH RESOLUTION; NUMERICAL MODELLING; NUMERICAL MODELS; RHEOLOGICAL PARAMETER; SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS; SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS METHODS; VELOCITY-PRESSURE; VOLCANIC EDIFICE; VOLCANIC ORIGIN;

DEBRIS; DECISION MAKING; FLOW VELOCITY; FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUIDIZATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; RAIN; RHEOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VELOCITY; VOLCANOES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEBRIS FLOW; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; FLOW VELOCITY; GEOLOGICAL MAPPING; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HYDRODYNAMICS; LAHAR; RHEOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; POPOCATEPETL; PUEBLA [MEXICO];

EID: 77955174663     PISSN: 00137952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Andrés N., Zamorano J.J., Sanjosé J.J., Atkinson A., Palacios D. Glacier retreat during the recent eruptive period of Popocatépetl volcano (Mexico). Ann. Glaciol. 2007, 45:73-82.
2. Arai M., Takahashi T. The karman constant of the flow laden with high sediment. Proc. 3rd Int Symp. On River Sedimentation, Univ. of Mississippi 1986, 824-833.
3. Arattano M., Franzi L. On the evaluation of debris flows dynamics by means of mathematical models. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2003, 3:539-544.
4. Bagnold R.A. Experiments in a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 1954, 225:49-63.
5. Benz W. Smooth particle hydrodynamics: a review. The Numerical Modelling of Nonlinear Stellar Pulsatations 1990, 269-288. Kluwer Academic Publishers. J.R. Buchler (Ed.).
6. Biot M.A. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J. Appl. Phys. 1941, 12:155-164.
7. Biot M.A. Theory of elasticity ad consolidation for a porous anisotropic solid. J. Appl. Phys. 1955, 26:182-185.
8. Bonet J., Rodíguez Paz M.X. A corrected smooth particle hydrodynamics formulation of the shallow-water equations. Comput. Struct. 2005, 83:1396-1410.
9. Bowen R.M. Incompressible porous media models by use of the theory of mixtures. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 1980, 18:1129-1148.
10. Bowen R.M. Compressible porous media models by use of theories of mixtures. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 1982, 20:697-735.
11. Capra L., Poblete M.A., Alvarado R. The 1997 and 2001 lahars of Popocatépetl volcano (Central Mexico): textural and sedimentological constraints on their origin and hazards. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2004, 131:351-369.
12. Chen C. Generalized viscoplastic modelling of debris flow. J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE 1988, 114(3):237-258.
13. Chen H., Lee C.F. Numerical simulation of debris flows. Can. Geotech. J. 1999, 37:146-160.
14. Clicken H. Rockslide-debris avalanche of May 18, 1980, Mount St. Helens volcano, Washington. Bull. Geol. Surv. Jpn. 1998, 49:55-106.
15. Davies T.R.H. Spreading of rock avalanche debris by mechanical fluidization. Rock Mech. 1982, 15:9-24.
16. Dent J.D., Lang T.E. A biviscous modified bingham model of snow avalanche motion. Ann. Glaciol. 1983, 4:42-46.
17. Fisher R.V., Schmincke H.V. Pyroclastic Rocks 1984, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.
18. Fraccarollo L., Papa M. Numerical simulation of real debris-flow events. Phys. Chem. Earth (B) 2000, 25(9):757-763.
19. Gingold R.A., Monaghan J.J. Smoothed particles hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 1977, 181:375-389.
20. Green A.E. On basic equations for mixtures. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 1969, 22:428-438.
21. Hsü K.J. Catastrophic debris streams (Sturzstroms) generated by rockfalls. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1975, 86:129-140.
22. Huang X., García M.H. A perturbation solution for Bingham-plastic mudflows. J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE 1997, 123(11):986-994.
23. Huang X., García M.H. A Herschel-Bulkley model for mud flow down a slope. J. Fluid Mech. 1998, 374:305-333.
24. Hungr O. A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows and avalanches. Can. Geotech. J. 1995, 32(4):610-623.
25. Hunt B. Newtonian fluid mechanics treatment of debris flows and avalanches. J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE 1994, 120:1350-1363.
26. Hutchinson J.N. A sliding-consolidation model for flow slides. Can. Geotech. J. 1986, 23:115-126.
27. Hutter K., Koch T. Motion of a granular avalanche in an exponentially curved chute: experiments and theoretical predictions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, A 1991, 334:93-138.
28. Imran J., Harff P., Parker G. A number model of submarine debris-flow with a graphical user interface. Comp. Geosci. 2001, 27:717-729.
29. Iverson R.M. The physics of debris flows. Rev. Geophys. 1997, 35:245-296.
30. Iverson R.I., Denlinger R.P. Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three dimensional terrain. 1. Coulomb mixture theory. J. Geophys. Res. 2001, 106:537-552. N0.B1.
31. Jan C.D. A study on the numerical modelling of debris flow, debris flow hazards mitigation. Mech. Pred. Assessment, ASCE 1997.
32. Johnson A.M. Physical Processes in Geology 1970, Freeman, San Francisco.
33. Laigle D., Coussot P. Numerical modelling of mudflows. J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE 1997, 123(7):617-623.
34. Lajeunesse E., Mangeney-Castelnau A., Vilotte J.P. Spreading of a granular mass on an horizontal plane. Phys. Fluids 2004, 16(7):2371-2381.
35. Legros F. The mobility of long-runout landslide. Eng. Geol. 2002, 63:301-331.
36. Li S., Liu W.K. Meshfree particle method 2004, Springer Verlag.
37. Liu G.R., Liu M.B. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: a meshfree particle method. World Scientific 2003.
38. Liu K.F., Mei C.C. Slow spreading of a sheet of Bingham fluid on an inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 1989, 207:505-529.
39. Lucy L.B. A numerical approach to the testing of fusion process. Astron. J. 1977, 82:1013-1024.
40. Mainali A., Rajaratnam N. Experimental study of debris flows. J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE 1994, 120(1). 04-123.
41. Mangeney A., Bouchut F., Thomas N., Vilotte J.P., Bristeau M.O. Numerical modeling of self-channeling granular flows and of their levee-channel deposits. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112:F02017.
42. McDougall S., Hungr O. A model for the analysis of rapid landslide motion across three-dimensional terrain. Can. Geotech. J. 2004, 41(12):1084-1097.
43. Monaghan J.J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1992, 30:543-574.
44. Monaghan J.J., Gingold R.A. Shock simulation by the particle method SPH. J. Comp. Phys. 1983, 52:374-389.
45. Monaghan J.J., Lattanzio J.C. A refined particle method for astrophysical problems. Astron. Astrophys. 1985, 149:135-143.
46. Muñoz-Salinas E., Renchler C., Palacios D., Namikawa L.M. Updating channel morphology in digital elevation models: lahar assessment for Tenenpanco-Huiloac Gorge, Popocatépetl, Mexico. Nat. Hazards 2008, 45:309-320.
47. Muñoz-Salinas E., Renchler C., Palacios D. A GIS-based method to determine the volume of lahars: Popocatépetl volcano, Mexico. Geomorphology 2009, 111:61-69.
48. Muñoz-Salinas E., Manea V.C., Palacios D., Castillo-Rodriguez M. Estimation of lahar flow velocity on Popocatepetl volcano (Mexico). Geomorphology 2007, 92(1-2):91-99.
49. O'Brien J.S., Julien P.Y. Laboratory analysis of mudflow properties. J. Hydraul. Eng., ASCE 1988, 114(8):877-887.
50. Pastor M., Quecedo M., Fernández Merodo J.A., Herreros M.I., González E., Mira P. Modelling tailing dams and mine waste dumps failures. Geotechnique 2002, LII(8):579-592.
51. Pastor M., Quecedo M., González E., Herreros I., Fernandez Merodo J.A., Mira P. An eulerian model for soil dynamics: application to fase slope movements. Rev. Française Genie Civil 2003, 7:1017-1035.
52. Pastor M., Quecedo M., González E., Herreros I., Fernández Merodo J.A., Mira P. A simple approximation to bottom friction for Bingham fluid depth integrated models. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 2004, 130(2):149-155.
53. Pastor M., Quecedo M., González E., Herreros I., Fernández Merodo J.A., Mira P. Modelling of landslides (II) propagation. Degradation and Instabilities in Geomaterials 2004, 319-367. Springer Wien, New York. F. Darve, I. Vardoulakis (Eds.).
54. Pastor M., Haddad B., Sorbino G., Cuomo S., Drempetic V. A depth Integrated SPH model for flow like landslides and related phenomena. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 2009, 33:143-172.
55. Pierson T.C., Costa J.E. A rheologic classification of subaerial sediment-water flows. Geol. Soc. Am. Rev. Eng. Geol. 1987, 1-12. J.E. Costa, G.F. Wieczorek (Eds.).
56. Pudasaini S.P., Hutter K. Dynamics of Rapid Flows of Dense Granular Avalanches 2007, Springer, New York.
57. Quecedo M., Pastor M. Finite element modelling of free surface flows on inclined and curved beds. J. Comput. Phys. 2003, 189(1):45-62.
58. Quecedo M., Pastor M., Herreros M.I., Fernández Merodo J.A. Numerical modelling of the propagation of fast landslides using the finite element method. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 2004, 59(6):755-794.
59. Remaître A., Malet J., Maquaire O., Ancey C., Locat J. Flow behaviour and runout modelling of complex debris flow in a clay-shale basin. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 2005, 30:479-488.
60. Rickenmann D. Empirical relationships for debris flows. Nat. Hazards 1999, 19(1):47-77.
61. Rickenmann D., Laigle D., MacArdell B.W., Huebl J. Comparison of 2D debris-flow simulation models with field events. Comput. Geosci. 2006, 10:241-264.
62. Savage S.B., Hutter K. The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline. J. Fluid Mech. 1989, 199:177-215.
63. Savage S.B., Hutter K. The dynamics of avalanches of granular materials from initiation to runout. Part I: analysis. Acta Mech. 1991, 86(1-4):201-223.
64. Smith G.A., Fritz W.J. Volcanic influences on terrestrial sedimentation. Geology 1989, 17:375-376.
65. Sosio R., Crosta G.B., Hungr O. Complete dynamic modeling calibration for the Thurwieser rock avalanche (Italian Central Alps). Eng. Geol. 2008, 100:11-26.
66. Takahashi T. Mechanical characteristics of debris flow. J. Hydr. Div., ASCE 1978, 104(8):1153-1169.
67. Takahashi T. Debris Flow 1991, A.A. Balkema, Brookfield, Vt.
68. Trunk F.J., Dent J.D., Lang T.E. Computer modelling of large rock slides. J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE 1986, 112(3):348-360.
69. Whipple K.X. Open-channel flow of Bingham fluids: applications in debris-flow research. J. Geol. 1997, 105:243-262.
70. Zienkiewicz O.C., Shiomi T. Dynamic behaviour of saturated porous media: the generalised Biot formulation and its numerical solution. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 1984, 8:71-96.
71. Zienkiewicz O.C., Chang C.T., Bettess P. Drained, undrained, consolidating dynamic behaviour assumptions in soils. Geotechnique 1980, 30:385-395.
72. Zienkiewicz O.C., Chan A.H.C., Pastor M., Paul D.K., Shiomi T. Static and dynamic behaviour of soils: a rational approach to quantitative solutions. I. Fully saturated problems. Proc. R. Soc. London A 1990, 429:285-309.
73. Zienkiewicz O.C., Xie Y.M., Schrefler B.A., Ledesma A., Bicanic N. Static and dynamic behaviour of soils: a rational approach to quantitative solutions. II. Semi-saturated problems. Proc. R. Soc. London A 1990, 429:311-321.
74. Zienkiewicz O.C., Chan A.H.C., Pastor M., Shrefler B.A., Shiomi T. Computational Geomechanics 1999, J. Wiley and Sons.