Updating channel morphology in digital elevation models: Lahar assessment for Tenenepanco-Huiloac Gorge, Popocatépetl volcano, Mexico

Natural Hazards

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 309-320

  Muñoz Salinas, Esperanza ^a   Renschler, C S ^b   Palacios, D ^a   Namikawa, L M ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Channel; Digital Elevation Model; Geomorphology; Lahars; Volcano

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; CHANNEL FLOW; CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; LAHAR; REMOTE SENSING; VOLCANIC ERUPTION; VOLCANIC LANDFORM;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA; POPOCATEPETL; PUEBLA [MEXICO];

EID: 41849092681     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-007-9162-x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Ackerman CT, Evans TA, Brunner GW (2000) HEC-GeoRAS: Linking GIS to hydraulic analysis using ARC/INFO and HEC-RAS. Dr David Maidment, Dr. Dean Djokic (eds). Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling support with Geographic Information System. ESRI press, Redlands, California
2. Capra L, Poblete MA and Alvarado R (2004) The 1997 and 2001 lahars of Popocatépetl volcano (Central Mexico): Textural and sedimentological constraints on their origin and hazards. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 131:351-369
3. Chow V (1959) Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York
4. Costa JE (1984) Physical geomorphology of debris flow. In: Costa JE, Fleicher (eds), Development and applications of geomorphology, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 268-317
5. Fisher RV, Schmincke HV (1984) Pyroclastic rocks. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
6. Hellweger F 2004. AGREE-DEM surface reconditioning system. (12/01/04; Last updated 01/10/97) (http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/maidment/GISHYDRO/ ferdi/research/agree/agree.html)
7. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, 1978. Huejotzingo (E14B42). Topographical Map 1:50,000 scale
8. Johnson AM (1970) Physical processes in geology. Freeman, New York
9. Long WS (2000) Development of digital terrain representation for use in river modeling. In: Dr David Maidment, Dr. Dean Djokic (eds), Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling support with Geographic Information System. ESRI Press, Redlands, California
10. Palacios D, Zamorano JJ, Parrilla G (1998) Proglacial debris flows in Popocatépetl north face their relation to 1995 eruption. Z Geomorph 42:273-295
11. Palacios D, Zamorazo JJ, Gomez A (2001) The impact of present lahars on the geomorphologic evolution of proglacial gorges: Popocatépetl, México. Geomorphology 37:15-42
12. Pasquaré G, Vezzoli L, Zanchi A (1987) Morphological and structural model of Mexican Volcanic Belt. Geofis Int 26:159-179
13. Patra AK, Bauer AC, Nichita CC, Pitman EB, Sheridan MF, Bursik M, Renschler CS, Rupp B, Webb A, Stinton A, Namikawa L (2005) Parallel adaptive numerical simulation of dry avalanches over natural terrain. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 139(1-2):1-21
14. Renschler CS (2005) Scales and uncertainties in volcano hazard prediction - optimizing the use of GIS and models. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 139(1-2):73-87
15. Sheridan MF, Hubbard B, Bursik MI, Abrams M, Siebe C, Macias JL, Delgado H (2001) Gauging short-term volcanic hazards at Popocatépetl. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 82:187-188
16. Smith GA, Fritz WJ (1989) Volcanic influences on terrestrial sedimentation. Geology 17:375-376
17. Thouret JC, Lavigne F (2000) Lahars: Occurrence, deposits and behaviour of volcano-hydrologic flows.Volcaniclastic rocks from magmas to sediments. In: Hervé Leyrit, Christian Montenat (eds) Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, pp 151-174
18. Valdés C, de la Cruz S, Quaas R, Guevara E, Martínez A, Cautelan G (2003) Resumen de la actividad del volcán Popocatépetl, diciembre 1994 a mayo de 2001. CENAPRED, http://www.cenapred.unam.mx/mvolcan.html
19. Van Westen CJ (1997) Modelling erosion from pyroclastic flow deposits on Mount Pinatubo In: ILWIS 2.1 for Windows - the integrated land and water information system: Applications guide. International Institute for Aerospace Survey & Earth Sciences, Enschede, The Netherlands, pp 53-72